Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 24 July 2026

URA vs Lugazi Municipal: match statistics

URA crest
URA
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Lugazi Municipal crest
Lugazi Municipal
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

URA clearly outperforms Lugazi Municipal in terms of form and home statistics. The hosts remain undefeated in their last 5 matches (1 win, 4 draws) and have conceded just 1 goal, demonstrating a solid defense. URA boasts a positive home goal difference (+3) and higher scoring efficiency (1.4 goals per home game), while Lugazi is yet to win an away match this season (0% win rate) and suffers from a disastrous -15 goal difference. The visitors average a mere 0.2 goals per game on the road and fail to score in 80% of their fixtures. URA's superiority in ball possession (52% vs 42%), shots on target (5.2 vs 1.88), and higher xG (1.77 vs 1.22) further confirms their dominance. Considering all these factors, a home victory is the most likely scenario.

URA vs Lugazi Municipal: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

URA play Lugazi Municipal in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 11 March 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

URA: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Lugazi Municipal: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

URA scores 0.90 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Lugazi Municipal scores 0.63 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: URA 40%, Lugazi Municipal 30%. Over 2.5: URA 27%, Lugazi Municipal 37%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

URA has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.28. URA: 11.0 shots per match, Lugazi Municipal: 8.2.

Match halves

URA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Lugazi Municipal: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.30.

Goals by minute

URA: 31-45+ (8 goals). Lugazi Municipal: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

URA clearly outperforms Lugazi Municipal in terms of form and home statistics. The hosts remain undefeated in their last 5 matches (1 win, 4 draws) and have conceded just 1 goal, demonstrating a solid defense. URA boasts a positive home goal difference (+3) and higher scoring efficiency (1.4 goals per home game), while Lugazi is yet to win an away match this season (0% win rate) and suffers from a disastrous -15 goal difference. The visitors average a mere 0.2 goals per game on the road and fail to score in 80% of their fixtures. URA's superiority in ball possession (52% vs 42%), shots on target (5.2 vs 1.88), and higher xG (1.77 vs 1.22) further confirms their dominance. Considering all these factors, a home victory is the most likely scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
URALugazi Municipal
12Shots8
URALugazi Municipal
3Shots on target0
URALugazi Municipal
1.67xG0.96
URALugazi Municipal
9Corners5
URALugazi Municipal
96Dangerous attacks61
URALugazi Municipal
-1Fouls-1
URALugazi Municipal
-1Cards-1
URALugazi Municipal

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

URALugazi Municipal
0.9Goals scored / match0.63
URALugazi Municipal
0.97Goals conceded / match1.2
URALugazi Municipal
51%Average possession40%
URALugazi Municipal
4.37Shots on target / match2.13
URALugazi Municipal

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match8.2
URALugazi Municipal
4.37Shots on target2.13
URALugazi Municipal
8.2%Shot conversion7.7%
URALugazi Municipal
51%Possession40%
URALugazi Municipal
1.56xG for1.28
URALugazi Municipal
1.38xG against1.74
URALugazi Municipal

Shooting quality

URA: BalancedLugazi Municipal: Balanced
URALugazi Municipal
Accuracy (shots on target)40%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

URA is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - URA · 1 pts / match - Lugazi Municipal

URA
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W53% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-16-9
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-3
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Lugazi Municipal
WLDDL
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-15
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-8
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

URA is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - URA · 0.63 goals / match - Lugazi Municipal

URA is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - URA · 1.2 goals / match - Lugazi Municipal

URA scoring profile: mixed

URA scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Lugazi Municipal keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Lugazi Municipal scoring profile: more difficult

Lugazi Municipal scores in 37% of matches (11 of 30 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

27Goals scored (season)19
URALugazi Municipal
29Goals conceded (season)36
URALugazi Municipal
1.87Average goals in match1.83
URALugazi Municipal
7Goals scored (last 5)2
URALugazi Municipal
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
URALugazi Municipal

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal37%
URALugazi Municipal
17%2 goals13%
URALugazi Municipal
10%3 goals7%
URALugazi Municipal
3%4 goals3%
URALugazi Municipal

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal67%
URALugazi Municipal
27%2 goals37%
URALugazi Municipal
10%3 goals13%
URALugazi Municipal
0%4 goals3%
URALugazi Municipal

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time7%
URALugazi Municipal
7%BTTS in both halves0%
URALugazi Municipal
13%Scored in both halves13%
URALugazi Municipal

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
URALugazi Municipal
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
URALugazi Municipal
60%BTTS - last 50%
URALugazi Municipal

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
URALugazi Municipal
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
URALugazi Municipal
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
URALugazi Municipal

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
URALugazi Municipal
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
URALugazi Municipal
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
URALugazi Municipal

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

URA is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - URA · 1.1 pts / match - Lugazi Municipal

URA - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing
Lugazi Municipal - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.1
URALugazi Municipal
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.3
URALugazi Municipal
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
URALugazi Municipal
0.93Average goals (1st half)0.83
URALugazi Municipal
60%Clean sheet before half-time63%
URALugazi Municipal
67%No goal before half-time77%
URALugazi Municipal

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)0.93
URALugazi Municipal
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.3
URALugazi Municipal
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
URALugazi Municipal
0.93Average goals (2nd half)0.9
URALugazi Municipal
60%Clean sheet after half-time53%
URALugazi Municipal
70%No goal after half-time77%
URALugazi Municipal

URA - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lugazi Municipal - second-half results

13% W53% R33% P
33
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Lugazi Municipal - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Lugazi Municipal
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
4
31-45
0
8
46-60
0
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
19%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
32%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Lugazi Municipal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
47% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
47%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

URALigaLugazi Municipal
Average goals in match 1.872.09 1.83
Both teams scored 40%38% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%35% 37%
Clean sheets 40%39% 33%
Goal before half-time 57%59% 53%
Goal after half-time 60%62% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: URA 0 - 1 - 0 Lugazi Municipal. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Lugazi Municipal
0 : 0
URA

FAQ

What was the result of URA vs Lugazi Municipal?

The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 1:0 Lugazi Municipal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Lugazi Municipal?

URA score 0.90 goals per game on average and Lugazi Municipal 0.63. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 40% of URA's matches and 30% of Lugazi Municipal's.

What form are URA and Lugazi Municipal in?

Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Lugazi Municipal 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Lugazi Municipal?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.