Vipers vs Kitara: match statistics
Vipers vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Vipers play Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 10 April 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Vipers: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Vipers scores 1.90 and concedes 0.48 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72. League average: 2.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Vipers 48%, Kitara 38%. Over 2.5: Vipers 41%, Kitara 31%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.62. Vipers: 10.8 shots per match, Kitara: 11.3.
Match halves
Vipers: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.00. Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
Vipers: 31-45+ (13 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Vipers are the clear favorites: at home they have an 82% win rate, 0% losses and average 2.45 goals scored per game with 13.09 shots and 5.09 shots on target. Their shot conversion rate is 19% versus Kitara’s 9% on the road, which means the hosts convert almost twice as many chances into goals; Vipers also have a home xG per game of 1.79 compared to Kitara’s 1.72 xG away. Defensively Vipers concede an average of 0.55 goals per home game, while Kitara concede 0.7 away; additionally Vipers have never finished a home game without scoring (0% such matches), whereas Kitara fail to score in 30% of their away trips. Form for both teams is good — Vipers average 2.6 points in their last 5 matches and Kitara 2.2, both with 9 goals scored in the last 5 fixtures — but the hosts’ superiority in quality and efficiency (difference in average goals at home 2.45 vs 1.00 away) is decisive. Consequently I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Vipers | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Vipers is 120% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Vipers · 1 pts / match - Kitara
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vipers is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
1.9 goals / match - Vipers · 1.38 goals / match - Kitara
Vipers is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.48 goals / match - Vipers · 0.72 goals / match - Kitara
Vipers scores in 93% of matches (27 of 29 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).
Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Vipers
Over / Under — Kitara
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vipers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kitara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Vipers
Kitara
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Vipers | Liga | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.38 | 2.09 | • 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 38% | • 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 41% | 35% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 39% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 62% | 59% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 62% | ▼ 55% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Vipers vs Kitara?
The Uganda Premier League match finished Vipers 0:0 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vipers vs Kitara?
Vipers score 1.90 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.38. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Vipers's matches and 38% of Kitara's.
What form are Vipers and Kitara in?
Over the last 5 games Vipers have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Kitara 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vipers vs Kitara?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.