Romania - Liga IIStadionul GloriaData current as of October 17, 2026

ACS Gloria Bistrita vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: match statistics

ACS Gloria Bistrita vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

ACS Gloria Bistrita played against CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Stadionul Gloria. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

ACS Gloria Bistrita has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

ACS Gloria Bistrita scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.25. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores 1.25 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of ACS Gloria Bistrita's games and 63% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 63%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

ACS Gloria Bistrita has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.28 per game. ACS Gloria Bistrita takes 13.5 shots per game, while CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

ACS Gloria Bistrita leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

ACS Gloria Bistrita's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga II games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ACS Gloria Bistrita have the edge in chance creation at home: their average xG is 1.67, compared with CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea’s 1.12 away from home, while shots on target average 4.75 and 2.67 per match, respectively. The hosts score an average of 1.5 goals at home and have found the net in every home match so far, while the visitors average 1 goal away and have failed to score in 33% of their matches. The away side’s defense also gives opponents opportunities: they concede an average of 1.67 goals on the road and allow chances worth 1.59 xG. However, the hosts’ advantage is not decisive, as they have lost 3 of their last 5 matches, while the visitors have won 2 of their 3 away games so far. Nevertheless, the greater volume and quality of chances point to a narrow ACS Gloria Bistrita victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes landed in 80% of ACS Gloria Bistrita’s matches, but in only 33% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea’s, so the full-season data do not provide a clear signal. However, both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches, conceding an average of 1.6 and 2.0 goals respectively. The hosts score an average of 1.4 goals with an xG of 1.39, while the visitors concede 1.67 goals against opponents’ xG of 1.59, which strongly points to a Bistrita goal. An away goal is less certain, as the visitors score an average of 1.0 goals and have failed to score in 33% of their matches. However, the hosts are yet to keep a clean sheet and concede an average of 1.6 goals. Both teams therefore have a realistic chance of scoring, although the visitors’ lower scoring rate limits the appeal of BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 80% of the home team’s matches and 67% of the visitors’ fixtures. Gloria average 1.4 goals scored, while opponents concede 1.67; in addition, the hosts’ xG is 1.39, compared with 1.59 xG conceded by the visitors. On the other hand, the hosts concede an average of 1.6 goals, giving Râmnicu Vâlcea a chance to add to the score despite averaging just 1.0 goal per match. Over 2.5 goals landed in 60% and 80% of the teams’ last five matches, respectively, but the projected total of 2.86 goals supports the more cautious Over 1.5 line as the stronger signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is ACS Gloria Bistrita leading at the break and winning the match, although the home side’s advantage is not clear-cut. The hosts were ahead at half-time in 2 of their 5 matches, while the visitors failed to score in the first half in 2 of their 3 games, supporting an HT/FT pick for Bistrita to take an early lead. The hosts’ average of 4.6 shots on target compared with 2.67 for the visitors, along with Bistrita’s xG of 1.39 versus their opponents’ 1.12, points to them holding on to their advantage. After the break, the visitors concede an average of 1.0 goals, while the hosts score 0.6, so the second half does not necessarily point to a turnaround. The risk is nonetheless significant: the visitors have won 2 of their 3 matches, compared with just 1 of 5 for the hosts, so the other Half-Time/Full-Time outcomes retain a substantial share of the forecast.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
12Shots9
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
3Shots on target3
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.41xG1.2
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10Corners2
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
61Dangerous attacks57
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
14Fouls12
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0Cards0
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.5Goals scored / game1.25
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.25Goals allowed / game1.63
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
54%Average possession48%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
5.88Shots on target / game3.88
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.5Shots per game9.88
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
5.88Shots on target3.88
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
11.1%Shot conversion12.7%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
54%Possession48%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.76xG for1.28
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.22xG against1.42
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Shooting quality

ACS Gloria Bistrita: BalancedCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: Balanced
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Accuracy (shots on target)44%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - ACS Gloria Bistrita · 1.4 pts / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

ACS Gloria Bistrita
LWWLL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-4
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 at home
2-0-2
WLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
DWLLW
Season result split
38% W25% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-3
1.38 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ACS Gloria Bistrita is 20% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - ACS Gloria Bistrita · 1.25 goals / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

ACS Gloria Bistrita is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - ACS Gloria Bistrita · 1.63 goals / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

ACS Gloria Bistrita scoring profile: very strong

ACS Gloria Bistrita scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 games), while CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 games).

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scoring profile: very strong

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while ACS Gloria Bistrita keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).

12Goals scored (season)10
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10Goals conceded (season)13
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
2.75Average goals per game2.88
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
6Goals scored (last 5)7
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal75%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
50%2 goals38%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
13%3 goals13%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%4 goals0%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal88%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
38%2 goals50%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
13%3 goals13%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%4 goals13%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 8 games
60%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time25%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%Scored in both halves13%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
60%BTTS - last 560%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time63%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / game - ACS Gloria Bistrita · 1.38 pts / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

ACS Gloria Bistrita - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per game (1st half)1.38
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.75
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.63
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
38%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
63%No goal before half-time50%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per game (2nd half)1.13
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.25
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
63%Clean sheet after half-time38%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
50%No goal after half-time63%
ACS Gloria BistritaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

ACS Gloria Bistrita - second-half results

38% W50% D13% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding385%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - second-half results

38% W0% D63% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

ACS Gloria Bistrita - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game1.20.2
Average goals per game2.00.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game1.40.6
Average goals per game2.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

ACS Gloria Bistrita
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

ACS Gloria Bistrita

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

ACS Gloria BistritaLigaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Average goals per game▼ 2.752.99▼ 2.88
Both teams scored▲ 63%60%▲ 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%57%▲ 63%
Clean sheets▲ 25%22%▼ 13%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%79%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 63%85%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.69
Home goals / game
1.30
Away goals / game
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ACS Gloria BistritaGoalMarius Lupu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of ACS Gloria Bistrita vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?

The Liga II match finished ACS Gloria Bistrita 1:0 CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ACS Gloria Bistrita vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?

ACS Gloria Bistrita score 1.50 goals per game on average and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 1.25. The Liga II average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 63% of ACS Gloria Bistrita's matches and 63% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea's.

What form are ACS Gloria Bistrita and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in?

Over the last 5 games ACS Gloria Bistrita have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ACS Gloria Bistrita vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.