Romania - Liga IIData current as of September 14, 2026

Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna: match statistics

Afumaţi crest
Afumaţi
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Concordia Chiajna crest
Concordia Chiajna

Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Afumaţi played against Concordia Chiajna in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Afumaţi has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Concordia Chiajna has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Afumaţi scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 1.31. Concordia Chiajna scores 1.42 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of Afumaţi's games and 42% of Concordia Chiajna's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 35%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Afumaţi has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.62 per game. Afumaţi takes 11.7 shots per game, while Concordia Chiajna takes 12.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Afumaţi leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.81 goals per game after halftime. Concordia Chiajna leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.92 after halftime.

When the teams score

Afumaţi's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Concordia Chiajna, it is minutes 61-75 (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga II games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win — Concordia Chiajna. Concordia have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.6 points per game in that period, while Afumaţi have only 1 win and average 0.8 points per game in their last 5. Both teams have 37 goals scored this season, but Concordia have conceded 26 compared to Afumaţi's 34; away they concede 1.25 goals on average, whereas the hosts concede 1.43 at home, which favors the visitors. Afumaţi create more chances at home (avg xG 1.72, 4.71 shots on target and 9% conversion) versus Concordia away (xG 1.41, 3.25 shots on target and 7% conversion), however a high home loss rate (57%) and poor points return in the last 5 matches reduce their chances. Overall, Concordia's form stability and better defense (only 2 goals conceded in the last 5 matches) give the visitors an edge, although I expect goals from both sides.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

xG and shots analysis points to a BTTS - Yes scenario: home xG 1.80 and xG against visitors 1.46 produce about 1.63 expected goals for Afumaţi, while visitors’ xG 1.41 and xG against home 1.36 produce about 1.39 for Concordia, which in a simple model translates to ~61% probability of BTTS. Seasonally the home side scores 1.93 and concedes 0.79 per match, whereas the visitors score 0.83 and concede 1.25, so on seasonal numbers the home team has the stronger attack. Last 5 form shifts this view: visitors have scored 8 in their last 5 (1.6 per match) and conceded only 2 (0.4), while the hosts have scored 7 (1.4) and conceded 8 (1.6), indicating Concordia are currently efficient and the home side can be vulnerable at the back. Additionally, the home team has kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches this season and their seasonal BTTS is 36%, while the league average BTTS is 49% — this reduces confidence, but the xG advantage (1.80 vs 1.41), higher shots on target (5.5 vs 3.25) and the visitors’ current form lead me to back Both Teams To Score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model combining the teams' attacking xG and opposing defense xG indicates expected 1.63 goals for Afumaţi and 1.39 goals for Concordia, totaling 3.02 goals. Afumaţi score 1.93 goals per match on average (xG 1.8), produce 13.71 shots with 5.5 on target and a conversion rate of 14%, while Concordia average 0.83 goals per match (xG 1.41), 11.5 shots and 3.25 on target with a 7% conversion. Season-to-date percentages show 79% of Afumaţi’s matches and 58% of Concordia’s matches finished over 1.5 goals, and the league average is 2.7 goals per match, which further increases the likelihood of at least two goals. A Poisson distribution with λ≈3.02 yields estimates of Over 1.5 ≈80%, Over 2.5 ≈58% and Over 3.5 ≈36%, so Over 2.5 is moderately likely but Over 1.5 is the strongest signal. Based on these figures I recommend backing over 1.5 (line 1.5, side "over") as the safest and statistically justified selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I forecast an HT/FT scenario 1/1: Afumaţi leads at the break and ultimately wins the match. Afumaţi were leading at the break in 6 matches (43%) and score an average of 0.71 goals by half-time, whereas Concordia led only once (8%) and average 0.25 goals by half-time. This season the home side score 1.93 goals per game versus 0.83 for the visitors, have xG 1.80 versus 1.41, average 5.5 shots on target per game against 3.25 and a higher conversion rate 14% versus 7%, translating into 64% home wins. Afumaţi are also strong after the break — they average 1.21 goals in second halves, have accumulated 31 points in second halves and a 64% win rate in those periods, so they have the tools to hold or extend a lead. Concordia are in good form (80% wins in their last 5 matches and an average of 2.6 points in those fixtures), giving them some chances for a turnaround, but Afumaţi’s superior efficiency and chance advantage make 1/1 the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
5Shots8
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
2Shots on target4
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.87xG1.21
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4Corners6
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
55Dangerous attacks56
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
-1Fouls-1
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
-1Cards-1
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.42Goals scored / game1.42
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.31Goals allowed / game1
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
52%Average possession54%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4.92Shots on target / game4.46
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.73Shots per game12.69
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4.92Shots on target4.46
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
12.1%Shot conversion11.2%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
52%Possession54%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.69xG for1.62
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.53xG against1.41
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Shooting quality

Afumaţi: BalancedConcordia Chiajna: Balanced
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
Accuracy (shots on target)42%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Concordia Chiajna is 225% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Afumaţi · 2.6 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna

Afumaţi
LWDLL
Season result split
38% W15% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-12
1.31 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-8
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Concordia Chiajna
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
46% W15% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-10
1.54 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Concordia Chiajna is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.31 goals / game - Afumaţi · 1 goals / game - Concordia Chiajna

Afumaţi scoring profile: strong

Afumaţi scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 meczów), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 meczów).

Concordia Chiajna scoring profile: very strong

Concordia Chiajna scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 meczów), while Afumaţi keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 meczów).

37Goals scored (season)37
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
34Goals conceded (season)26
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
2.73Average goals per game2.42
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
7Goals scored (last 5)8
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
8Goals conceded (last 5)2
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal73%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
46%2 goals38%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
15%3 goals8%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4%4 goals8%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal65%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
42%2 goals23%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
15%3 goals8%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0%4 goals4%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

42%
Concordia Chiajna - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 meczów
49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time12%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
8%BTTS in both halves0%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
27%Scored in both halves23%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
60%BTTS - last 540%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Afumaţi is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - Afumaţi · 1.12 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna

Afumaţi - half-time state
35% leading35% draw31% trailing
Concordia Chiajna - half-time state
27% leading31% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)1.12
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.08
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
54%Clean sheet before half-time46%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
46%No goal before half-time62%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.73
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.35
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
50%Clean sheet after half-time73%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
50%No goal after half-time42%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Afumaţi - second-half results

35% W35% D31% L
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Concordia Chiajna - second-half results

46% W35% D19% L
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Afumaţi - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Concordia Chiajna - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.60
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.0
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Afumaţi
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
8
6
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
6
46-60
6
8
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Concordia Chiajna
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
7
31-45
6
0
46-60
14
3
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Afumaţi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Concordia Chiajna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

AfumaţiLigaConcordia Chiajna
Average goals per game 2.732.70 2.42
Both teams scored 54%49% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%49% 35%
Clean sheets 27%29% 35%
Goal before half-time 81%72% 81%
Goal after half-time 77%82% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Afumaţi's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Concordia Chiajna. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Afumaţi
1 : 2
Concordia Chiajna

FAQ

What was the result of Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna?

The Liga II match finished Afumaţi 1:0 Concordia Chiajna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna?

Afumaţi score 1.42 goals per game on average and Concordia Chiajna 1.42. The Liga II average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Afumaţi's matches and 42% of Concordia Chiajna's.

What form are Afumaţi and Concordia Chiajna in?

Over the last 5 games Afumaţi have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Concordia Chiajna 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna?

The statistical background for Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.