Romania - Liga IIData current as of 23 July 2026

Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna: match statistics

Afumaţi crest
Afumaţi
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Concordia Chiajna crest
Concordia Chiajna

Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Afumaţi play Concordia Chiajna in Liga II (Romania). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 10:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Afumaţi: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Concordia Chiajna: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Afumaţi scores 1.36 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Concordia Chiajna scores 1.39 and concedes 1.04. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Afumaţi 50%, Concordia Chiajna 43%. Over 2.5: Afumaţi 50%, Concordia Chiajna 36%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Afumaţi has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.61. Afumaţi: 11.6 shots per match, Concordia Chiajna: 12.5.

Match halves

Afumaţi: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.79. Concordia Chiajna: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Afumaţi: 76-90+ (11 goals). Concordia Chiajna: 61-75 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict an away win — Concordia Chiajna. Concordia have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.6 points per game in that period, while Afumaţi have only 1 win and average 0.8 points per game in their last 5. Both teams have 37 goals scored this season, but Concordia have conceded 26 compared to Afumaţi's 34; away they concede 1.25 goals on average, whereas the hosts concede 1.43 at home, which favors the visitors. Afumaţi create more chances at home (avg xG 1.72, 4.71 shots on target and 9% conversion) versus Concordia away (xG 1.41, 3.25 shots on target and 7% conversion), however a high home loss rate (57%) and poor points return in the last 5 matches reduce their chances. Overall, Concordia's form stability and better defense (only 2 goals conceded in the last 5 matches) give the visitors an edge, although I expect goals from both sides.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
5Shots8
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
2Shots on target4
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.87xG1.21
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4Corners6
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
55Dangerous attacks56
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
-1Fouls-1
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
-1Cards-1
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.36Goals scored / match1.39
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.25Goals conceded / match1.04
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
53%Average possession54%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4.75Shots on target / match4.46
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.57Shots per match12.54
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4.75Shots on target4.46
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
11.7%Shot conversion11.1%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
53%Possession54%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.66xG for1.61
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.51xG against1.41
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Shooting quality

Afumaţi: BalancedConcordia Chiajna: Balanced
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Concordia Chiajna is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Afumaţi · 1.6 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna

Afumaţi
DLLWL
Season result split
39% W14% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-8
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Concordia Chiajna
DWWLD
Season result split
43% W18% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-11
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Concordia Chiajna is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Afumaţi · 1.04 goals / match - Concordia Chiajna

Afumaţi scoring profile: strong

Afumaţi scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

Concordia Chiajna scoring profile: strong

Concordia Chiajna scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while Afumaţi keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).

38Goals scored (season)39
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
35Goals conceded (season)29
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
2.61Average goals in match2.43
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4Goals scored (last 5)7
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal71%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
43%2 goals39%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
14%3 goals7%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
4%4 goals7%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal68%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
39%2 goals25%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
14%3 goals7%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0%4 goals4%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
Concordia Chiajna - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 28 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time14%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
7%BTTS in both halves4%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
25%Scored in both halves25%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
60%BTTS - last 560%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Afumaţi is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Afumaţi · 1.11 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna

Afumaţi - half-time state
32% leading36% draw32% trailing
Concordia Chiajna - half-time state
25% leading36% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.11
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.07
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
54%Clean sheet before half-time46%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
50%No goal before half-time61%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)1.64
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.36
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
54%Clean sheet after half-time68%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna
50%No goal after half-time43%
AfumaţiConcordia Chiajna

Afumaţi - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Concordia Chiajna - second-half results

43% W36% R21% P
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Afumaţi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Concordia Chiajna - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Afumaţi
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
8
6
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
6
46-60
6
8
61-75
11
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Concordia Chiajna
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
0
46-60
14
4
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Afumaţi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Concordia Chiajna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

AfumaţiLigaConcordia Chiajna
Average goals in match 2.612.71 2.43
Both teams scored 50%49% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%49% 36%
Clean sheets 29%29% 32%
Goal before half-time 79%72% 79%
Goal after half-time 75%82% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Afumaţi 0 - 0 - 1 Concordia Chiajna. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Afumaţi
1 : 2
Concordia Chiajna

FAQ

What was the result of Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna?

The Liga II match finished Afumaţi 1:0 Concordia Chiajna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna?

Afumaţi score 1.36 goals per game on average and Concordia Chiajna 1.39. The Liga II average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Afumaţi's matches and 43% of Concordia Chiajna's.

What form are Afumaţi and Concordia Chiajna in?

Over the last 5 games Afumaţi have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Concordia Chiajna 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna?

The statistical background for Afumaţi vs Concordia Chiajna — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.