Al Ahly vs ENPPI: match statistics
Al Ahly vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Ahly play ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 5 May 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Al Ahly: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. ENPPI: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Ahly scores 1.69 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. ENPPI scores 1.04 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.02 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Ahly 58%, ENPPI 46%. Over 2.5: Al Ahly 50%, ENPPI 35%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Al Ahly has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.14. Al Ahly: 15.6 shots per match, ENPPI: 9.0.
Match halves
Al Ahly: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.81. ENPPI: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Al Ahly: 76-90+ (10 goals). ENPPI: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Al Ahly are the favorites: at home they win 73% of matches, score an average of 1.64 goals per game and have an average xG of 1.84, whereas ENPPI win only 21% of away matches and score 1.14 goals on average with xG 1.04. Offensively the hosts clearly dominate — 15.64 average shots and 5.82 on target per home game versus 8.36 shots and 2.36 on target for the visitors, producing more goal-scoring opportunities. Defensively Al Ahly have the superior seasonal record (0.73 goals conceded per home game vs ENPPI’s 1.00 conceded away), although note that the hosts have conceded 8 goals in their last 5 matches (1.6 per game). ENPPI register a high draw rate on the road (57%) and an above-average shot conversion (14% conversion despite fewer chances), so a draw is a realistic outcome, but 36% of their away matches end with them failing to score. Considering the possession advantage (62% vs 51%), superiority in chance creation and higher xG, I assign a 62% probability to an Al Ahly win, 24% to a draw and 14% to an ENPPI win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ahly | ENPPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Ahly is 300% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Al Ahly · 0.6 pts / match - ENPPI
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ahly is 63% better for: goals scored per match.
1.69 goals / match - Al Ahly · 1.04 goals / match - ENPPI
Al Ahly scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).
ENPPI scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Al Ahly keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Ahly
Over / Under — ENPPI
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ahly is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.85 pts / match - Al Ahly · 1.23 pts / match - ENPPI
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ahly - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
ENPPI - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Ahly
ENPPI
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Ahly | Liga | ENPPI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.62 | 2.02 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 47% | • 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 34% | • 35% |
| Clean sheets | • 35% | 35% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 58% | ▲ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 70% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Ahly 0 - 1 - 0 ENPPI. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ahly vs ENPPI?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Al Ahly 3:0 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ahly vs ENPPI?
Al Ahly score 1.69 goals per game on average and ENPPI 1.04. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Al Ahly's matches and 46% of ENPPI's.
What form are Al Ahly and ENPPI in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ahly have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and ENPPI 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ahly vs ENPPI?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.