Al Hazm vs Al Taawon: match statistics
Al Hazm vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Hazm play Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 21 May 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Al Hazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Al Taawon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Hazm scores 1.12 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Al Taawon scores 1.74 and concedes 1.35. League average: 3.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Hazm 59%, Al Taawon 65%. Over 2.5: Al Hazm 59%, Al Taawon 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Al Hazm has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.32. Al Hazm: 11.8 shots per match, Al Taawon: 11.8.
Match halves
Al Hazm: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.71. Al Taawon: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Al Hazm: 76-90+ (14 goals). Al Taawon: 61-75 (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Al Taawon (away) are the favorites: they have 15 wins this season versus Al Hazm’s 10 and have scored 59 goals versus 36. The visitors’ key advantage is efficiency and goal difference — Al Taawon score an average of 1.88 goals away with a conversion rate of 19% and concede 1.25 per match, while the hosts at home average 1.25 goals with a 10% conversion and concede 1.88. Although Al Hazm have higher home xG (1.45 vs the visitors’ xG 1.18) and more shots (13 vs 9.94), their 31% of matches without a goal highlights finishing issues. In the last 5 matches Al Taawon have scored 9 goals versus Al Hazm’s 5 and have higher points per game over the last 5 (1.4 vs 1.0), confirming the current advantage. Therefore I assess probabilities at 55% for Al Taawon, 20% for Al Hazm and 25% for a draw.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Hazm | Al Taawon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Hazm is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Al Hazm · 0.8 pts / match - Al Taawon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Taawon is 55% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.74 goals / match - Al Taawon
Al Taawon is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.68 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.35 goals / match - Al Taawon
Al Hazm scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).
Al Taawon scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Hazm
Over / Under — Al Taawon
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Taawon is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.5 pts / match - Al Taawon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Hazm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Taawon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Hazm
Al Taawon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Hazm | Liga | Al Taawon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.79 | 3.01 | • 3.09 |
| Both teams scored | • 59% | 58% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 56% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 23% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 75% | • 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 80% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Hazm 0 - 1 - 0 Al Taawon. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?
The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 2:0 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?
Al Hazm score 1.12 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 1.74. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Al Hazm's matches and 65% of Al Taawon's.
What form are Al Hazm and Al Taawon in?
Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Taawon 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.