Al Hikma vs Shabab Al Sahel: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates very evenly matched chances for both teams. Al Hikma is in 7th place in the table and has a goal difference of 0 at home, with an average of 1.5 goals scored and conceded per home match. Shabab Al Sahel, in 6th place, also shows a goal difference of 0 away, with an average of 1 goal scored and conceded. Both teams' form is unstable – the hosts have averaged 1 point per match in their last 5 games, while the visitors have performed slightly better with 1.4 points. A key factor is the visitors' advantage in possession (53% vs 49%) and higher xG (1.23 vs 1.0), suggesting slightly better quality of chances created. Considering the balanced statistics, unstable form of both teams, and identical goal differences, the most probable outcome appears to be a draw, with a slight advantage for the hosts due to playing at home.
Al Hikma vs Shabab Al Sahel: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Hikma played against Shabab Al Sahel in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The game was played on February 16, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Al Hikma has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Shabab Al Sahel has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Hikma scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 1.29. Shabab Al Sahel scores 0.93 and allows 0.79. Games in this league average 2.20 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Al Hikma's games and 36% of Shabab Al Sahel's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 29%, compared with league averages of 29% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.03 per game. Al Hikma takes 6.9 shots per game, while Shabab Al Sahel takes 7.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Hikma leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Shabab Al Sahel leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Hikma's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For Shabab Al Sahel, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Lebanese Premier League games average 2.20 goals. Both teams score in 29% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates very evenly matched chances for both teams. Al Hikma is in 7th place in the table and has a goal difference of 0 at home, with an average of 1.5 goals scored and conceded per home match. Shabab Al Sahel, in 6th place, also shows a goal difference of 0 away, with an average of 1 goal scored and conceded. Both teams' form is unstable – the hosts have averaged 1 point per match in their last 5 games, while the visitors have performed slightly better with 1.4 points. A key factor is the visitors' advantage in possession (53% vs 49%) and higher xG (1.23 vs 1.0), suggesting slightly better quality of chances created. Considering the balanced statistics, unstable form of both teams, and identical goal differences, the most probable outcome appears to be a draw, with a slight advantage for the hosts due to playing at home.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Hikma | Shabab Al Sahel | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 50% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shabab Al Sahel is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Al Hikma · 1.4 pts / game - Shabab Al Sahel
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hikma is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
1.07 goals / game - Al Hikma · 0.93 goals / game - Shabab Al Sahel
Shabab Al Sahel is 63% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.29 goals / game - Al Hikma · 0.79 goals / game - Shabab Al Sahel
Al Hikma scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Shabab Al Sahel keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 meczów).
Shabab Al Sahel scores in 57% of games (8 of 14 meczów), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Hikma
Over / Under - Shabab Al Sahel
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Hikma is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Al Hikma · 0.86 pts / game - Shabab Al Sahel
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Hikma - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Shabab Al Sahel - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Hikma
Shabab Al Sahel
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Hikma | Liga | Shabab Al Sahel | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.36 | 2.20 | ▼ 1.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 36% | 29% | ▲ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 42% | • 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 55% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Shabab Al SahelGoalAbdullah Moghrabi
- Al HikmaAssistRabih Ataya
Head-to-head
Record from Al Hikma's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Shabab Al Sahel. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Hikma vs Shabab Al Sahel?
The Lebanese Premier League match finished Al Hikma 2:1 Shabab Al Sahel. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Hikma vs Shabab Al Sahel?
Al Hikma score 1.07 goals per game on average and Shabab Al Sahel 0.93. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Al Hikma's matches and 36% of Shabab Al Sahel's.
What form are Al Hikma and Shabab Al Sahel in?
Over the last 5 games Al Hikma have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Shabab Al Sahel 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hikma vs Shabab Al Sahel?
The statistical background for Al Hikma vs Shabab Al Sahel — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.