Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Al Ittihad vs Al Hazm: match statistics

Al Ittihad crest
Al Ittihad
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm

Al Ittihad vs Al Hazm: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Al Ittihad played against Al Hazm in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on April 3, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Al Ittihad has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Al Hazm has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Al Ittihad scores 1.58 goals per game and allows 1.31. Al Hazm scores 1.12 and allows 1.81. Games in this league average 3.03 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Al Ittihad's games and 65% of Al Hazm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 65%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Al Ittihad has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.27 per game. Al Ittihad takes 13.6 shots per game, while Al Hazm takes 10.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Al Ittihad leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. Al Hazm leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.69 after halftime.

When the teams score

Al Ittihad's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Al Hazm, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Professional League games average 3.03 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Ittihad holds a clear advantage in game control and chance creation — 62% average possession and 14.5 shots with 5.33 on-target per home match versus 44% possession, 9.31 shots and 3.92 on-target for Al Hazm away. This translates into chance quality: home xG averages 1.77 versus 1.11 xG for the visitors away, with hosts scoring 1.25 goals per home match on average and Al Hazm only 1.00. The home defense is seasonally more solid — 0.92 conceded per home match versus 1.62 conceded by Al Hazm away; hosts have 33% clean sheets versus 8% for the visitors, and across the season Ittihad conceded 34 goals versus Hazm’s 47. In the short term Al Hazm has slightly better points form (1.4 points per match in the last 5 vs 1.0 for Ittihad) and scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches compared to 6 for the hosts, however the visitors’ negative away goal difference (-8) and lower xG limit their realistic chances. On this basis I predict an Al Ittihad win; I estimate the probability at approximately 68% for a home win, 18% for a draw and 14% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Indicators favor BTTS - Yes: Al Ittihad has a seasonal percentage of matches with both teams scoring at 69%, Al Hazm 62%, and the league average 59%, with BTTS in the last 5 matches at 80%. xG and shot metrics confirm risk of goals from both sides — Al Ittihad generates average xG 1.41 against an Al Hazm defense conceding xG 1.54, while Al Hazm has xG 1.11 against an Al Ittihad defense allowing xG 1.36; additionally Al Ittihad scores on average 1.23 goals per season, Al Hazm 1.00. Both teams rarely keep clean sheets (8% of matches each) and in the last 5 games they conceded on average 1.8 goals each, reducing the likelihood of a No Goal outcome. Home side averages 12.54 shots (4.0 on target), visitors 9.31 (3.92 on target) with conversion rates of 10% and 11%; the high share of matches over 2.5 goals (69% for the home team and 62% for the visitors) and a 62% combination rate of Over 2.5 & BTTS for the home side indicate an open game. Therefore I assign 75% to BTTS - Yes and 25% to No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Combination of xG and form: Al Ittihad's attack has xG 1.41, Al Hazm's defense concedes xG 1.54, yielding a projected 1.48 goals for the home side; conversely Al Hazm's attack xG 1.11 and Al Ittihad's defense 1.36 suggest 1.24 for the visitors, totaling 2.72 expected goals. Seasonally 92% of Al Ittihad’s matches and 85% of Al Hazm’s matches exceed the 1.5 goal line, and the league average is 3.03 goals per game, therefore I strongly favor Over 1.5 (probability ~92%). The 2.5 line has moderate backing: 69% of Al Ittihad’s matches and 62% of Al Hazm’s matches this season exceed 2.5 goals, and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 6 goals (1.2 avg), the visitors 7 goals (1.4 avg), which supports Over 2.5 at roughly 64%. The 3.5 line is less likely: only 38% of Al Ittihad’s matches and 23% of Al Hazm’s matches exceed 3.5 goals, so I assess Under 3.5 at about 69%. Additionally, the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is 69% for the home side and 62% for the away side, and average shots on target around 4.0 and 3.92 confirm the offensive nature of the game, which further argues that Over 1.5 is the best choice.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Al Ittihad draws at half-time in 69% of home matches, while Al Hazm led at the break in 31% of their games; in the last five matches the visitors scored 7 goals by half-time versus only 3 for the hosts. The home side have the superior offensive edge: on average 12.54 shots and 1.41 xG at home compared to Al Hazm’s 9.31 shots and 1.11 xG, giving them greater potential for a turnaround after the break. In the second half Al Ittihad scores an average of 0.85 goals (vs 0.54 for the visitors) and 92% of their matches feature at least one goal after half-time; additionally the hosts have scored as many as 10 goals in minutes 76–90, indicating effective finishes. The visitors win only 23% of matches as the away team, and the hosts lead at the break in only 8% of home games, so the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
Al IttihadAl Hazm
12Shots20
Al IttihadAl Hazm
5Shots on target7
Al IttihadAl Hazm
1.43xG2.05
Al IttihadAl Hazm
5Corners9
Al IttihadAl Hazm
44Dangerous attacks42
Al IttihadAl Hazm
8Fouls20
Al IttihadAl Hazm
2Cards2
Al IttihadAl Hazm

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Al IttihadAl Hazm
1.58Goals scored / game1.12
Al IttihadAl Hazm
1.31Goals allowed / game1.81
Al IttihadAl Hazm
60%Average possession46%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
5Shots on target / game3.96
Al IttihadAl Hazm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.58Shots per game10.92
Al IttihadAl Hazm
5Shots on target3.96
Al IttihadAl Hazm
11.6%Shot conversion10.2%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
60%Possession46%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
1.62xG for1.27
Al IttihadAl Hazm
1.21xG against1.44
Al IttihadAl Hazm

Shooting quality

Al Ittihad: BalancedAl Hazm: Balanced
Al IttihadAl Hazm
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Al Hazm is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Al Ittihad · 1.4 pts / game - Al Hazm

Al Ittihad
DDWLL
Season result split
46% W23% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-8
1.62 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-0-4
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Hazm
LDWLW
Season result split
31% W27% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-11
1.19 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-5
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ittihad is 41% better for: goals scored per game.

1.58 goals / game - Al Ittihad · 1.12 goals / game - Al Hazm

Al Ittihad is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.31 goals / game - Al Ittihad · 1.81 goals / game - Al Hazm

Al Ittihad scoring profile: very strong

Al Ittihad scores in 81% of games (21 of 26 meczów), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 26 meczów).

Al Hazm scoring profile: strong

Al Hazm scores in 65% of games (17 of 26 meczów), while Al Ittihad keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 meczów).

41Goals scored (season)29
Al IttihadAl Hazm
34Goals conceded (season)47
Al IttihadAl Hazm
2.88Average goals per game2.92
Al IttihadAl Hazm
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Al IttihadAl Hazm
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Al IttihadAl Hazm

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal65%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
38%2 goals38%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
19%3 goals8%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
15%4 goals0%
Al IttihadAl Hazm

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal92%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
38%2 goals50%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
12%3 goals19%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
4%4 goals15%
Al IttihadAl Hazm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time23%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
27%Scored in both halves15%
Al IttihadAl Hazm

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
80%BTTS - last 580%
Al IttihadAl Hazm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Al IttihadAl Hazm

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Al IttihadAl Hazm

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Ittihad is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.54 pts / game - Al Ittihad · 1.12 pts / game - Al Hazm

Al Ittihad - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing
Al Hazm - half-time state
19% leading54% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per game (1st half)1.12
Al IttihadAl Hazm
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Al IttihadAl Hazm
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Al IttihadAl Hazm
1.35Average goals (1st half)1
Al IttihadAl Hazm
58%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
50%No goal before half-time69%
Al IttihadAl Hazm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.08
Al IttihadAl Hazm
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Al IttihadAl Hazm
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)1.23
Al IttihadAl Hazm
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.92
Al IttihadAl Hazm
42%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Al IttihadAl Hazm
42%No goal after half-time50%
Al IttihadAl Hazm

Al Ittihad - second-half results

38% W23% D38% L
40
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Al Hazm - second-half results

27% W27% D46% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Al Ittihad - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game0.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Al Hazm - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Al Ittihad
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
7
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
7
10
46-60
2
2
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
4
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
9
46-60
2
8
61-75
10
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.91
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Al Ittihad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al IttihadLigaAl Hazm
Average goals per game 2.883.03 2.92
Both teams scored 58%59% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%57% 65%
Clean sheets 23%23% 8%
Goal before half-time 73%73% 54%
Goal after half-time 88%81% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / game
1.45
Away goals / game
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al IttihadRed cardMoussa Diaby
  2. Al HazmYellow cardYousef Al Shammari
  3. Al HazmYellow cardAbdurahman Al Dakheel
  4. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Abdullah Al-ShanqitiOff: Abdurahman Al Dakheel
  5. Al IttihadGoalAbdulrahman Al ObodAssist: Houssem Aouar
  6. Al IttihadSubstitutionOn: Abdulaziz Ali Al BishiOff: Steven Bergwijn
  7. Al IttihadSubstitutionOn: Awad Haidar Al NashriOff: Youssef En-Nesyri

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Shukri Hussain Al-HunfushMatches officiated: 9
3.11Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 256%Home wins22%Draws22%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Al Ittihad's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Al Hazm. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Ittihad vs Al Hazm?

The Professional League match finished Al Ittihad 1:0 Al Hazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Ittihad vs Al Hazm?

Al Ittihad score 1.58 goals per game on average and Al Hazm 1.12. The Professional League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Al Ittihad's matches and 65% of Al Hazm's.

What form are Al Ittihad and Al Hazm in?

Over the last 5 games Al Ittihad have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Hazm 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ittihad vs Al Hazm?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Ittihad vs Al Hazm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.