Al Ittihad vs Pharco: match statistics
Al Ittihad show significantly better form in their last five matches with a record of three wins and 1.8 points per game, while Pharco average only 0.6 points per game on a streak of three draws and two defeats. The hosts have superior offensive statistics at home (0.9 goals per match vs Pharco's 0.6 goals away) and an advantage in Expected Goals (xG 1.28 vs 0.91). Pharco have not won any of their last five matches and have a high 50% loss rate on the road, which, combined with Al Ittihad's 40% clean sheet record at home, gives the hosts a realistic chance of success. Although Al Ittihad are only 15th in the table, their recent form (WWLWL) and superior ball possession (51% vs 40%) point to a home win; however, poor finishing from both sides (9% vs 8% shot conversion) and Pharco's defensive approach (40% draws away) suggest the possibility of a tight outcome.
Al Ittihad vs Pharco: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Ittihad played against Pharco in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on March 22, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Al Ittihad has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Pharco has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Ittihad scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 1.20. Pharco scores 0.40 and allows 1.10. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 35% of Al Ittihad's games and 25% of Pharco's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 10%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Ittihad has the higher season xG average, 1.16 to 1.00 per game. Al Ittihad takes 9.8 shots per game, while Pharco takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Ittihad leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. Pharco leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Ittihad's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Pharco, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Ittihad show significantly better form in their last five matches with a record of three wins and 1.8 points per game, while Pharco average only 0.6 points per game on a streak of three draws and two defeats. The hosts have superior offensive statistics at home (0.9 goals per match vs Pharco's 0.6 goals away) and an advantage in Expected Goals (xG 1.28 vs 0.91). Pharco have not won any of their last five matches and have a high 50% loss rate on the road, which, combined with Al Ittihad's 40% clean sheet record at home, gives the hosts a realistic chance of success. Although Al Ittihad are only 15th in the table, their recent form (WWLWL) and superior ball possession (51% vs 40%) point to a home win; however, poor finishing from both sides (9% vs 8% shot conversion) and Pharco's defensive approach (40% draws away) suggest the possibility of a tight outcome.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ittihad | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.15 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Ittihad is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Al Ittihad · 0.6 pts / game - Pharco
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ittihad is 88% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Al Ittihad · 0.4 goals / game - Pharco
Pharco is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - Al Ittihad · 1.1 goals / game - Pharco
Al Ittihad scores in 60% of games (12 of 20 meczów), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).
Pharco scores in 35% of games (7 of 20 meczów), while Al Ittihad keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Ittihad
Over / Under - Pharco
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pharco is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.7 pts / game - Al Ittihad · 1 pts / game - Pharco
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ittihad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Ittihad
Pharco
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Ittihad | Liga | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.95 | 2.00 | ▼ 1.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 46% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 40% | 33% | ▼ 10% |
| Clean sheets | • 35% | 34% | • 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 60% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 70% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Ittihad's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Pharco. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ittihad vs Pharco?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Al Ittihad 1:1 Pharco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ittihad vs Pharco?
Al Ittihad score 0.75 goals per game on average and Pharco 0.40. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Al Ittihad's matches and 25% of Pharco's.
What form are Al Ittihad and Pharco in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ittihad have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Pharco 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ittihad vs Pharco?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.