Al Nejmeh vs Reyady Abaseya: match statistics
Al Nejmeh demonstrates a decisive advantage in home matches, achieving a 67% win rate and an impressive 67% clean sheets. The hosts have a clear goal difference advantage at their own stadium (+8), with only 0.33 goals conceded on average per match. Reyady Abaseya, despite improved form in the last five matches (1.8 PPG), still shows weaknesses in away games with only a 44% win rate and a negative xG ratio (0.84 For vs 1.03 Against). Al Nejmeh also dominates in technical aspects: higher shot accuracy (26% vs 19%), better ball possession (55% vs 48%), and an xG advantage (1.08 vs 0.84). The table position (3rd place hosts vs 9th place visitors) further confirms the class difference between the teams. Taking all these factors into account, a confident victory for Al Nejmeh at home is expected.
Al Nejmeh vs Reyady Abaseya: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Nejmeh played against Reyady Abaseya in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The game was played on February 21, 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
Al Nejmeh has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Reyady Abaseya has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Nejmeh scores 1.71 goals per game and allows 0.57. Reyady Abaseya scores 0.75 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.19 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Al Nejmeh's games and 38% of Reyady Abaseya's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 38%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Nejmeh has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 0.85 per game. Al Nejmeh takes 6.9 shots per game, while Reyady Abaseya takes 5.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Nejmeh leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Reyady Abaseya leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Nejmeh's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Reyady Abaseya, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Lebanese Premier League games average 2.19 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Nejmeh demonstrates a decisive advantage in home matches, achieving a 67% win rate and an impressive 67% clean sheets. The hosts have a clear goal difference advantage at their own stadium (+8), with only 0.33 goals conceded on average per match. Reyady Abaseya, despite improved form in the last five matches (1.8 PPG), still shows weaknesses in away games with only a 44% win rate and a negative xG ratio (0.84 For vs 1.03 Against). Al Nejmeh also dominates in technical aspects: higher shot accuracy (26% vs 19%), better ball possession (55% vs 48%), and an xG advantage (1.08 vs 0.84). The table position (3rd place hosts vs 9th place visitors) further confirms the class difference between the teams. Taking all these factors into account, a confident victory for Al Nejmeh at home is expected.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Nejmeh | Reyady Abaseya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.52 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Reyady Abaseya is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Al Nejmeh · 1.8 pts / game - Reyady Abaseya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Nejmeh is 128% better for: goals scored per game.
1.71 goals / game - Al Nejmeh · 0.75 goals / game - Reyady Abaseya
Al Nejmeh is 98% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.57 goals / game - Al Nejmeh · 1.13 goals / game - Reyady Abaseya
Al Nejmeh scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Reyady Abaseya keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 meczów).
Reyady Abaseya scores in 44% of games (7 of 16 meczów), while Al Nejmeh keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Nejmeh
Over / Under - Reyady Abaseya
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Nejmeh is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / game - Al Nejmeh · 1.25 pts / game - Reyady Abaseya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Nejmeh - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Reyady Abaseya - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Nejmeh
Reyady Abaseya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Nejmeh | Liga | Reyady Abaseya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.29 | 2.19 | ▼ 1.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 36% | 30% | ▲ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 38% | • 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | • 71% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al NejmehGoalMasoud Juma Choka
- Al NejmehGoalAli Al Haj
- Al NejmehGoalMasoud Juma Choka
- Al NejmehGoalAli Mohamad Kassas
Head-to-head
Record from Al Nejmeh's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Reyady Abaseya. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Nejmeh vs Reyady Abaseya?
The Lebanese Premier League match finished Al Nejmeh 4:0 Reyady Abaseya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Nejmeh vs Reyady Abaseya?
Al Nejmeh score 1.71 goals per game on average and Reyady Abaseya 0.75. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Al Nejmeh's matches and 38% of Reyady Abaseya's.
What form are Al Nejmeh and Reyady Abaseya in?
Over the last 5 games Al Nejmeh have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Reyady Abaseya 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Nejmeh vs Reyady Abaseya?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


