Kuwait - Kuwait Premier LeagueData current as of September 02, 2026

Al Shabab vs Kazma: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Al Shabab vs Kazma: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Al Shabab plays Kazma in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The game is scheduled for September 6, 2026.

Recent form

Al Shabab has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Kazma has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Al Shabab scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.50. Kazma scores 1.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.75 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Al Shabab's games and 50% of Kazma's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 67% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kazma has the higher season xG average, 2.65 to 1.51 per game. Al Shabab takes 11.0 shots per game, while Kazma takes 21.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Al Shabab leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Kazma leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Al Shabab's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Kazma, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Kuwait Premier League games average 2.75 goals. Both teams score in 67% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game1.5
Al ShababKazma
1.5Goals allowed / game0.5
Al ShababKazma
51%Average possession54%
Al ShababKazma
5.5Shots on target / game4
Al ShababKazma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game21.5
Al ShababKazma
5.5Shots on target4
Al ShababKazma
18.2%Shot conversion7%
Al ShababKazma
51%Possession54%
Al ShababKazma
1.51xG for2.65
Al ShababKazma
1.15xG against0.94
Al ShababKazma

Shooting quality

Al Shabab: Efficient finishingKazma: Attacking
Al ShababKazma
Accuracy (shots on target)50%19%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Al Shabab
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
Kazma
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 2.65Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Shabab is 33% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Al Shabab · 1.5 goals / game - Kazma

Kazma is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - Al Shabab · 0.5 goals / game - Kazma

Al Shabab scoring profile: very strong

Al Shabab scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Kazma keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).

Kazma scoring profile: very strong

Kazma scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Al Shabab keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).

4Goals scored (season)3
Al ShababKazma
3Goals conceded (season)1
Al ShababKazma
3.5Average goals per game2
Al ShababKazma
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Al ShababKazma
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Al ShababKazma

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
Al ShababKazma
50%2 goals50%
Al ShababKazma
50%3 goals50%
Al ShababKazma
0%4 goals0%
Al ShababKazma

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Al ShababKazma
50%2 goals0%
Al ShababKazma
0%3 goals0%
Al ShababKazma
0%4 goals0%
Al ShababKazma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al ShababKazma
50%Scored in both halves50%
Al ShababKazma

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Al ShababKazma
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al ShababKazma
100%BTTS - last 550%
Al ShababKazma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Al ShababKazma

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Al ShababKazma

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Shabab is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / game - Al Shabab · 1 pts / game - Kazma

Al Shabab - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Kazma - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per game (1st half)1
Al ShababKazma
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Al ShababKazma
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Al ShababKazma
1Average goals (1st half)1
Al ShababKazma
100%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Al ShababKazma
0%No goal before half-time50%
Al ShababKazma

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per game (2nd half)2
Al ShababKazma
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Al ShababKazma
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Al ShababKazma
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1
Al ShababKazma
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Al ShababKazma
50%No goal after half-time50%
Al ShababKazma

Al Shabab - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.5

Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kazma - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Al Shabab - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.000.50
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.5
Average goals per game1.02.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kazma - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.00
Goals scored / game0.51.0
Goals allowed / game0.50.0
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Al Shabab
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
3
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Kazma
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Al Shabab

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Kazma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al ShababLigaKazma
Average goals per game 3.502.75 2.00
Both teams scored 100%67% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%58% 50%
Clean sheets 0%21% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%67% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%75% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per game
67%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.33
Away goals / game
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Al Shabab's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Kazma. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Al Shabab
0 : 2
Kazma
Kazma
1 : 1
Al Shabab

FAQ

When do Al Shabab and Kazma play?

Al Shabab face Kazma on September 6, 2026 in Kuwait Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Al Shabab and Kazma?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Shabab won 0, Kazma won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Shabab vs Kazma?

Al Shabab score 2.00 goals per game on average and Kazma 1.50. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Al Shabab's matches and 50% of Kazma's.

What form are Al Shabab and Kazma in?

Over the last 5 games Al Shabab have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Kazma 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Shabab vs Kazma?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.