Al Taawon vs Al Kholood: match statistics
Al Taawon vs Al Kholood: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Al Taawon played against Al Kholood in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Al Taawon has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Al Kholood has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Al Taawon scores 1.81 goals per game and allows 1.30. Al Kholood scores 1.29 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.06 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Al Taawon's games and 54% of Al Kholood's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 71%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Taawon has the higher season xG average, 1.22 to 1.15 per game. Al Taawon takes 10.6 shots per game, while Al Kholood takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Al Taawon leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 1.04 goals per game after halftime. Al Kholood leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.54 after halftime.
When the teams score
Al Taawon's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (12 goals). For Al Kholood, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 3.06 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Taawon are the clear favorites: the hosts sit 5th and average 2.00 goals scored per home match versus 1.31 conceded, while Al Kholood, as visitors, are 14th with 1.43 scored and 1.86 conceded on average. Edge to Al Taawon also comes from efficiency and control — 4.08 shots on target at home with a 17% conversion rate versus 3.5 and 13% for the away side. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 9 and conceded 8 (1.6 conceded per game) with a record of 1 win and 4 draws, whereas Al Kholood have conceded 16 in that period and failed to win any of those five (0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses). Chance quality also favors the hosts — Al Taawon’s average xG is 1.33 compared to 1.25 for Al Kholood on the road, and the hosts fail to score in only 8% of home games versus 43% of Al Kholood’s away fixtures, which increases the likelihood of a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS (YES): both teams have season BTTS rates of 57% (Al Taawon) and 50% (Al Kholood), with the last 5 matches at 100% and 80% respectively. Al Kholood shows clear defensive issues — conceding an average of 3.2 goals in their last 5 matches and 56 goals conceded this season, while Al Taawon has scored 9 goals in the last 5 and 49 on the season. xG supports an attacking profile: Al Taawon creates 1.06 xG per match, Al Kholood 1.25 xG, and expected xG against both is 1.64, indicating both sides generate scoring opportunities. Clean sheet percentages are low — 7% for the home side and 14% for the away — and the league average is 59% BTTS and 3.06 goals per match, further supporting a Goal/Goal outcome. Based on these figures I give BTTS 'Yes' a 75% probability vs 25% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model combining xG values and goal averages forecasts 1.35 goals for Al Taawon and 1.45 goals for Al Kholood, totaling 2.80 goals. Seasonally Al Taawon at home has 86% of matches over 1.5 goals, and Al Kholood away has 79%, while both teams register 71% of seasonal matches over 2.5 goals, indicating a propensity for high-scoring games. In the last 5 matches Kholood conceded an average of 3.2 goals and had 100% of matches over 2.5, while Taawon in their last five scored 1.8 and conceded 1.6 — this increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Both teams average 3.5 shots on target and have xG of 1.06 (Taawon) and 1.25 (Kholood), with BTTS percentages of 57% for the home side and 50% for the away side, further supporting a scenario of at least two goals. On this basis the strongest signal is Over 1.5 with an estimated probability of 77% (Over 2.5 = 53%, Over 3.5 = 31%), so I recommend an 'over' play on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates the 2/2 scenario as the strongest signal (25%), meaning Al Kholood leads at the break and wins the match. Al Kholood posts higher xG (1.25 vs 1.06) and a season scoring average of 1.43 goals versus Al Taawon’s 1.14, and registers more shots per game on average (11 vs 9), all pointing to the visitors’ effectiveness. Al Taawon concedes an average of 1.21 goals by half-time and was trailing at the break in 43% of matches, whereas Al Kholood were behind at half-time in only 29% of cases and score on average 0.71 goals after the break compared to the hosts’ 0.36. Accordingly, I assigned the highest probability to scenarios where the visitors lead at the break and maintain the lead (2/2 25%) or are level at half-time and stage a turnaround to win (X/2 22%); scenarios with the home side leading at the break were rated lower (e.g. 1/1 9%, 1/X 4%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Al Taawon | Al Kholood | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Taawon is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Al Taawon · 0.8 pts / game - Al Kholood
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Taawon is 40% better for: goals scored per game.
1.81 goals / game - Al Taawon · 1.29 goals / game - Al Kholood
Al Taawon is 54% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.3 goals / game - Al Taawon · 2 goals / game - Al Kholood
Al Taawon scores in 85% of games (23 of 27 meczów), while Al Kholood keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 meczów).
Al Kholood scores in 61% of games (17 of 28 meczów), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Taawon
Over / Under - Al Kholood
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Taawon is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / game - Al Taawon · 1.07 pts / game - Al Kholood
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Taawon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Kholood - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Al Taawon
Al Kholood
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Taawon | Liga | Al Kholood | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.11 | 3.06 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 57% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 23% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | • 74% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 81% | • 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Al Taawon's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Al Kholood. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Taawon vs Al Kholood?
The Professional League match finished Al Taawon 1:2 Al Kholood. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Taawon vs Al Kholood?
Al Taawon score 1.81 goals per game on average and Al Kholood 1.29. The Professional League average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Al Taawon's matches and 54% of Al Kholood's.
What form are Al Taawon and Al Kholood in?
Over the last 5 games Al Taawon have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Kholood 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Taawon vs Al Kholood?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.