Al Ula vs Al Raed: match statistics
Al Ula vs Al Raed: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Ula play Al Raed in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 19:50. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Al Ula: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Al Raed: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Ula scores 2.17 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Al Raed scores 1.88 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Ula 64%, Al Raed 68%. Over 2.5: Al Ula 69%, Al Raed 59%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Al Raed has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.58. Al Ula: 13.7 shots per match, Al Raed: 13.4.
Match halves
Al Ula: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 0.94. Al Raed: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.03.
Goals by minute
Al Ula: 31-45+ (25 goals). Al Raed: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Al Ula holds a clear offensive and overall advantage: they have scored 67 goals this season and average 2.27 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.74, while Al Raed have 56 goals this season and average 1.6 goals away with xG 1.68. Defensively the hosts also look stronger – Al Ula concede 0.8 goals per home match on average (xG against 0.99), whereas Al Raed concede 1.4 goals on the road (xG against 1.25), reflected in goal difference: +22 for Al Ula at home versus +3 for Al Raed away. Al Ula also generates more quality chances: on average 15.4 shots and 6.13 on target at home with a 15% conversion rate, while the visitors average 13.33 shots and 5.13 on target with a 12% conversion. The hosts fail to score in only 7% of home games, compared to Al Raed’s 20% rate of being held scoreless away. In form over the last 5 matches Al Ula have 9 goals and average 2 points per game, Al Raed 8 goals and 1.4 points per game; additionally the hosts win 60% of home matches versus 33% away wins for the visitors. Based on this, I project a home win as the most likely outcome.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ula | Al Raed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Ula is 71% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Al Ula · 1.4 pts / match - Al Raed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ula is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
2.17 goals / match - Al Ula · 1.88 goals / match - Al Raed
Al Ula is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.92 goals / match - Al Ula · 1.35 goals / match - Al Raed
Al Ula scores in 92% of matches (33 of 36 matches), while Al Raed keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).
Al Raed scores in 85% of matches (29 of 34 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 33% (12 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Ula
Over / Under — Al Raed
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ula is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.25 pts / match - Al Ula · 1.59 pts / match - Al Raed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ula - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Raed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 41%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (25 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Ula
Al Raed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Ula | Liga | Al Raed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.08 | 2.96 | ▲ 3.24 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 62% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 61% | ▼ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 22% | ▲ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 76% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 85% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Ula 0 - 0 - 1 Al Raed. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ula vs Al Raed?
The First Division match finished Al Ula 2:1 Al Raed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ula vs Al Raed?
Al Ula score 2.17 goals per game on average and Al Raed 1.88. The First Division average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Al Ula's matches and 68% of Al Raed's.
What form are Al Ula and Al Raed in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ula have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Al Raed 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ula vs Al Raed?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.