Uruguay - Primera DivisiónEstadio Luis FranziniData current as of September 06, 2026

Albion vs Wanderers: match statistics

Albion crest
Albion
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Wanderers crest
Wanderers

Albion vs Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Albion played against Wanderers in Primera División (Uruguay). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Venue: Estadio Luis Franzini. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Albion has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Wanderers has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Albion scores 1.73 goals per game and allows 1.07. Wanderers scores 1.07 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Albion's games and 53% of Wanderers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 60%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Wanderers has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.35 per game. Albion takes 11.0 shots per game, while Wanderers takes 11.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Albion leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. Wanderers leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.53 after halftime.

When the teams score

Albion's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Wanderers, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Primera División games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Albion is the favorite in this match — they sit 2nd in the table, have won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 13 goals in those games (2.6 per match), while Wanderers are 7th and have scored only 5 goals in their last 5 fixtures, winning 2. Home offensive strength for Albion is pronounced: at home Albion averages 2.25 goals per match, 11.25 shots and 5.0 on target per match with a conversion rate of 20%, whereas Wanderers on the road record 1.0 goals per match, 12.0 shots and only 3.57 on target with an 8% conversion. Defensively the hosts concede 1.5 goals at home on average (xG against 1.57), while Wanderers concede 1.86 goals away (xG against 1.59), giving the visitors less defensive reliability and a high away loss rate — 71%. Interestingly Albion generates an average home xG of 1.4 per match but actually converts that into 2.25 goals, indicating an edge in finishing, whereas Wanderers have an away xG of 1.48 but score only 1.0 goal, underperforming in chance completion. Considering the hosts’ 13 goals in the last 5 matches, an average of 3 points per match over that period, and the visitors’ poor efficiency (8% conversion and an average of 1.2 points per match in the last 5), I predict an Albion win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data indicate a prevailing Both Teams To Score scenario: Wanderers have a season BTTS rate of 71% and only 14% clean sheets, while Albion, despite a season BTTS of 38%, posts 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches. Offensively Albion is clearly better recently — season goals 1.13 per match, but in the last 5 averaging 2.6 goals (13 in 5), whereas Wanderers maintain 1.0 goals per match season-long and 1.0 in the last 5 (5 in 5). xG corroborates the exchange of chances: Albion xG for 1.40 versus Wanderers xG against 1.59, and Wanderers xG for 1.48 versus Albion xG against 1.46, so both teams generate around 1.4–1.6 xG per game. Additionally Wanderers concede 1.86 goals per game seasonally and have a low clean sheet rate of 14%, while Albion keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches — this gives a mixed signal but favors goals from both sides due to the visitors’ weaker defense and the hosts’ good form. Considering Wanderers’ season 71% BTTS, 60% BTTS in the last 5 for both teams, and Albion’s attacking form (2.6 goals/game recently), I assign 68% to BTTS - Yes and 32% to No as the strongest betting signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 2.88 (Albion 1.40 vs Wanderers 1.48), which implies nearly 3 scoring opportunities on average and exceeds the 1.5 and 2.5 thresholds. Albion have scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game) and won all 5, and season-to-date as hosts they have 63% of matches with over 1.5 goals, increasing their involvement in goals. Wanderers concede 1.86 goals on average this season, have only 14% clean sheets and 71% of matches where both teams scored, which raises the risk of conceded goals. Season-long over 2.5 rates are 50% for Albion and 71% for Wanderers, and in the last 5 matches both sides had over 2.5 in 60% of games; nevertheless the strongest and safest signal is over 1.5 (63% vs 86%). Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the best line; expected goals: Albion 1.40, Wanderers 1.48 (total 2.88).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is Albion leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1). Albion have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100% form), scoring an average of 2.6 goals in that run and netting 9 first-half goals in the last 5 fixtures (1.8 per match) versus Wanderers’ 4 first-half goals (0.8). On the season Albion average 1.13 goals per match and concede 1.0, keep clean sheets in 50% of games and average 1.63 points secured by half-time, while Wanderers average 1.0 goals per match, concede 1.86 and have only 14% clean sheets, which indicates a home defensive advantage. Although the teams’ xG figures are similar (1.4 vs 1.48), Albion register more on-target shots (4.63 vs 3.57) and have better finishing efficiency (10% vs 8%), increasing the likelihood that the home side will open the scoring and hold the lead. Wanderers have had both teams scoring in 71% of their matches this season, so scenarios such as a draw at half-time with a comeback are possible (e.g. X/1 18% or 1/X 12%), but the strongest signal from the data is 1/1 (42%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
AlbionWanderers
6Shots9
AlbionWanderers
1Shots on target2
AlbionWanderers
0.86xG1.2
AlbionWanderers
3Corners4
AlbionWanderers
55Dangerous attacks67
AlbionWanderers
-1Fouls-1
AlbionWanderers
2Cards1
AlbionWanderers

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.73Goals scored / game1.07
AlbionWanderers
1.07Goals allowed / game1.4
AlbionWanderers
54%Average possession47%
AlbionWanderers
4.67Shots on target / game4.13
AlbionWanderers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game11.33
AlbionWanderers
4.67Shots on target4.13
AlbionWanderers
15.8%Shot conversion9.4%
AlbionWanderers
54%Possession47%
AlbionWanderers
1.35xG for1.44
AlbionWanderers
1.43xG against1.52
AlbionWanderers

Shooting quality

Albion: Efficient finishingWanderers: Balanced
AlbionWanderers
Accuracy (shots on target)42%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Albion is 150% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - Albion · 1.2 pts / game - Wanderers

Albion
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
53% W27% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-3
1.87 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Wanderers
LLWLW
Season result split
40% W13% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-7
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-5
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Albion is 62% better for: goals scored per game.

1.73 goals / game - Albion · 1.07 goals / game - Wanderers

Albion is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.07 goals / game - Albion · 1.4 goals / game - Wanderers

Albion scoring profile: very strong

Albion scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).

Wanderers scoring profile: very strong

Wanderers scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while Albion keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)16
AlbionWanderers
16Goals conceded (season)21
AlbionWanderers
2.8Average goals per game2.47
AlbionWanderers
13Goals scored (last 5)5
AlbionWanderers
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
AlbionWanderers

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal80%
AlbionWanderers
47%2 goals20%
AlbionWanderers
20%3 goals7%
AlbionWanderers
7%4 goals0%
AlbionWanderers

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
AlbionWanderers
33%2 goals47%
AlbionWanderers
7%3 goals13%
AlbionWanderers
0%4 goals13%
AlbionWanderers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time13%
AlbionWanderers
7%BTTS in both halves0%
AlbionWanderers
20%Scored in both halves13%
AlbionWanderers

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
AlbionWanderers
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
AlbionWanderers
60%BTTS - last 560%
AlbionWanderers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

93%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
AlbionWanderers
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AlbionWanderers
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AlbionWanderers

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
AlbionWanderers
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
AlbionWanderers
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
AlbionWanderers

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Albion is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.53 pts / game - Albion · 1.33 pts / game - Wanderers

Albion - half-time state
40% leading33% draw27% trailing
Wanderers - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per game (1st half)1.33
AlbionWanderers
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.53
AlbionWanderers
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
AlbionWanderers
1.53Average goals (1st half)1.13
AlbionWanderers
40%Clean sheet before half-time53%
AlbionWanderers
33%No goal before half-time53%
AlbionWanderers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per game (2nd half)1.27
AlbionWanderers
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
AlbionWanderers
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
AlbionWanderers
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.33
AlbionWanderers
67%Clean sheet after half-time53%
AlbionWanderers
60%No goal after half-time53%
AlbionWanderers

Albion - second-half results

33% W47% R20% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Wanderers - second-half results

33% W27% R40% P
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Albion - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.60
Goals scored / game1.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Wanderers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Albion
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
2
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Wanderers
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
1
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Albion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

AlbionLigaWanderers
Average goals per game 2.802.52 2.47
Both teams scored 60%54% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%48% 60%
Clean sheets 33%25% 33%
Goal before half-time 93%73% 80%
Goal after half-time 60%76% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.10
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Alberto Javier FeresMatches officiated: 13
6.46Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 223%Home wins38%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Albion's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Wanderers. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Albion vs Wanderers?

The Primera División match finished Albion 0:0 Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Albion vs Wanderers?

Albion score 1.73 goals per game on average and Wanderers 1.07. The Primera División average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Albion's matches and 53% of Wanderers's.

What form are Albion and Wanderers in?

Over the last 5 games Albion have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Wanderers 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Albion vs Wanderers?

The statistical background for Albion vs Wanderers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.