Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: match statistics
Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Amed played against 76 Iğdır Belediyespor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on December 28, 2025. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Amed has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Amed scores 2.17 goals per game and allows 1.39. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores 1.61 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.92 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Amed's games and 83% of 76 Iğdır Belediyespor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 78% and 56%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.40 per game. Amed takes 15.7 shots per game, while 76 Iğdır Belediyespor takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Amed leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 1.17 goals per game after halftime. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Amed's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For 76 Iğdır Belediyespor, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.92 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Amed | 76 Iğdır Belediyespor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
76 Iğdır Belediyespor is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Amed · 2.2 pts / game - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 35% better for: goals scored per game.
2.17 goals / game - Amed · 1.61 goals / game - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
76 Iğdır Belediyespor is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.39 goals / game - Amed · 1.33 goals / game - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Amed scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while 76 Iğdır Belediyespor keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 meczów).
76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores in 89% of games (16 of 18 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Amed
Over / Under - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / game - Amed · 1.22 pts / game - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 61%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
76 Iğdır Belediyespor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Amed
76 Iğdır Belediyespor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Amed | Liga | 76 Iğdır Belediyespor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.56 | 2.92 | • 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 55% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 78% | 55% | • 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 26% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 72% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 80% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
The 1. Lig match finished Amed 3:0 76 Iğdır Belediyespor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
Amed score 2.17 goals per game on average and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 1.61. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Amed's matches and 83% of 76 Iğdır Belediyespor's.
What form are Amed and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor in?
Over the last 5 games Amed have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.