Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: match statistics
Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Amed play 76 Iğdır Belediyespor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 28 December 2025 at 17:00. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Amed: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Amed scores 2.13 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores 1.37 and concedes 1.42. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Amed 55%, 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 63%. Over 2.5: Amed 58%, 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.37. Amed: 15.5 shots per match, 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 11.5.
Match halves
Amed: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.16. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 0-15 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Amed | 76 Iğdır Belediyespor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
76 Iğdır Belediyespor is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Amed · 1 pts / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 55% better for: goals scored per match.
2.13 goals / match - Amed · 1.37 goals / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Amed is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.11 goals / match - Amed · 1.42 goals / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Amed scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while 76 Iğdır Belediyespor keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).
76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Amed
Over / Under — 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / match - Amed · 1.29 pts / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Amed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
76 Iğdır Belediyespor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Amed
76 Iğdır Belediyespor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Amed | Liga | 76 Iğdır Belediyespor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.24 | 2.92 | ▼ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 50% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 34% | 29% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 71% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 80% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Amed 0 - 1 - 0 76 Iğdır Belediyespor. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
The 1. Lig match finished Amed 3:0 76 Iğdır Belediyespor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
Amed score 2.13 goals per game on average and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 1.37. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Amed's matches and 63% of 76 Iğdır Belediyespor's.
What form are Amed and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor in?
Over the last 5 games Amed have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Amed vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.