Amed vs Bandırmaspor: match statistics
Amed vs Bandırmaspor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Amed played against Bandırmaspor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on December 13, 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Amed has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Bandırmaspor has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Amed scores 2.31 goals per game and allows 1.50. Bandırmaspor scores 1.25 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.98 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 69% of Amed's games and 44% of Bandırmaspor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 81% and 31%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.19 per game. Amed takes 15.9 shots per game, while Bandırmaspor takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Amed leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.31 goals per game after halftime. Bandırmaspor leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Amed's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Bandırmaspor, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.98 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Amed | Bandırmaspor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Amed · 2 pts / game - Bandırmaspor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 85% better for: goals scored per game.
2.31 goals / game - Amed · 1.25 goals / game - Bandırmaspor
Bandırmaspor is 70% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Amed · 0.88 goals / game - Bandırmaspor
Amed scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while Bandırmaspor keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
Bandırmaspor scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Amed
Over / Under - Bandırmaspor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / game - Amed · 1.44 pts / game - Bandırmaspor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Bandırmaspor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Amed
Bandırmaspor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Amed | Liga | Bandırmaspor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.81 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 81% | 57% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 26% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Amed vs Bandırmaspor?
The 1. Lig match finished Amed 2:1 Bandırmaspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Bandırmaspor?
Amed score 2.31 goals per game on average and Bandırmaspor 1.25. The 1. Lig average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Amed's matches and 44% of Bandırmaspor's.
What form are Amed and Bandırmaspor in?
Over the last 5 games Amed have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Bandırmaspor 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Bandırmaspor?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.