Amed vs Boluspor: match statistics
Amed vs Boluspor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Amed played against Boluspor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 6:1.
Recent form
Amed has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Boluspor has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Amed scores 2.13 goals per game and allows 1.00. Boluspor scores 1.56 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.92 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Amed's games and 56% of Boluspor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 59% and 50%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.51 per game. Amed takes 15.0 shots per game, while Boluspor takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Amed leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 1.16 goals per game after halftime. Boluspor leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Amed's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (18 goals). For Boluspor, it is minutes 31-45+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.92 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table with 20 wins and a 68-32 goal record this season, while Boluspor are 13th with 12 wins and a 50-44 record. At home Amed average 2.25 goals scored and concede only 0.63 per match, have 6.31 shots on target and a home xG of 1.89; Boluspor away average 1.5 goals per match, 4.69 shots on target and xG 1.45 while conceding 1.69 on average. In the last 5 matches Amed have 4 wins and 1 draw with 12 goals scored (2.4 avg) and 2 conceded, averaging 2.6 points per match, whereas Boluspor in their last 5 have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, only 3 goals (0.6 avg) and 1.0 points per match. Additionally, Amed win 81% of home games, keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches and show no home defeats in the provided stats, while Boluspor win only 25% of away games, have 13% clean sheets and 44% away losses, all favouring the home side. Based on this I predict an Amed victory and propose probabilities: 70% home win, 18% draw and 12% Boluspor.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators are mixed: Amed has a seasonal BTTS rate of 50%, Boluspor 63%, and the league average is 49%, suggesting moderate chances of both teams scoring. However, the last 5 matches strongly argue against BTTS: both teams have only 20% BTTS in their last five games, Amed averaged 2.4 goals scored and conceded 0.4, while Boluspor only 0.6 goals scored and conceded 0.8. Additionally, Amed at home has a 38% share of clean sheets, Boluspor only 13%, and the percentage of matches with no goals for one side is 19% for Amed and 31% for Boluspor, increasing the likelihood that at least one team will not score. Seasonal xG are similar (Amed 1.56 vs Boluspor 1.45), but in the last 5 matches Amed xG 1.82 vs Boluspor 1.17 and Boluspor’s actual 0.6 goals indicate finishing problems. Considering Amed’s dominant form (12 goals in 5 matches) and Boluspor’s poor finishing, I favor the 'No' scenario and assess BTTS at 41% for 'Yes' vs 59% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The aggregate statistical picture points to a match with goals: Amed scores on average 1.63 goals per game this season, Boluspor 1.50, and xG are 1.56 (Amed) and 1.45 (Boluspor). After adjusting for opponents’ defenses (xG against: Boluspor 1.35, Amed 1.06) I estimate expected goals of 1.46 for Amed and 1.26 for Boluspor, totaling 2.72. Historically Amed has 81% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Boluspor 75%, and the league averages 2.92 goals per match, which reinforces the over 1.5 signal. A Poisson model with λ=2.72 yields approximately a 76% probability of over 1.5, about 51% over 2.5 and about 29% over 3.5, and additionally Amed in the last 5 matches scores on average 2.4 goals while conceding only 0.4, so the strongest and most reliable pick is over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-Time/Full-Time statistics strongly favor Amed: in 3 of their last 5 matches they held the lead at the break (60%), and across those five matches they averaged 1.2 goals by half-time versus 0.2 for Boluspor. Amed have won 4 of their last 5 fixtures (80%) and have a season win rate of 50% compared to Boluspor’s 25%; the home side also collects an average of 1.81 points by half-time per match versus 1.38 for the visitors, supporting the maintenance of a lead. Defensively Amed concede only 0.38 goals by half-time compared to 0.88 for their opponents and keep a half-time clean sheet in 63% of matches versus 44% for Boluspor, reducing the risk of surrendering a lead. Additionally, the home side’s xG is 1.56 versus 1.45 for the visitors, and average shots are 13.75 vs 12.38, giving Amed a moderate offensive edge; Boluspor concede an average of 1.69 goals over the season. As a result the primary single signal is 1/1 (Amed leading at half-time and winning), with an alternative of X/1 (draw at half-time and home win).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Amed | Boluspor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 225% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Amed · 0.8 pts / game - Boluspor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 37% better for: goals scored per game.
2.13 goals / game - Amed · 1.56 goals / game - Boluspor
Amed is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Amed · 1.38 goals / game - Boluspor
Amed scores in 84% of games (27 of 32 meczów), while Boluspor keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 meczów).
Boluspor scores in 75% of games (24 of 32 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 41% (13 of 32 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Amed
Over / Under - Boluspor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.81 pts / game - Amed · 1.59 pts / game - Boluspor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Boluspor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 38%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Amed
Boluspor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Amed | Liga | Boluspor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.13 | 2.92 | • 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 29% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 80% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Amed's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Boluspor. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Amed vs Boluspor?
The 1. Lig match finished Amed 6:1 Boluspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Boluspor?
Amed score 2.13 goals per game on average and Boluspor 1.56. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Amed's matches and 56% of Boluspor's.
What form are Amed and Boluspor in?
Over the last 5 games Amed have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Boluspor 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Boluspor?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.