Amed vs Manisa BBSK: match statistics
Amed displays impressive home form with an 80% win rate and just 20% draws, remaining unbeaten at home this season. The hosts score an average of 2.27 goals per game while conceding only 0.67, translating into a +24 goal difference in home fixtures. Manisa BBSK shows poor away form, winning only 27% of their road games and conceding 1.87 goals on average while scoring just 1.2. The difference in play quality is also evident in xG stats: Amed generates 1.85 xG per home match compared to their opponents' 1.11 xG, while Manisa records xG for and against values of 1.2 and 1.59 respectively on the road. The form over the last five games also favors the hosts (2.2 PPG vs 1.8 for the visitors). Additionally, Amed has a 47% home clean sheet rate, suggesting defensive solidity. All these factors point to a clear advantage for Amed and a high probability of their victory.
Amed vs Manisa BBSK: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Amed played against Manisa BBSK in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on March 15, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Amed has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Manisa BBSK has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Amed scores 2.10 goals per game and allows 1.07. Manisa BBSK scores 1.53 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Amed's games and 57% of Manisa BBSK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 60%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.30 per game. Amed takes 14.9 shots per game, while Manisa BBSK takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Amed leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 1.13 goals per game after halftime. Manisa BBSK leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.90 after halftime.
When the teams score
Amed's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). For Manisa BBSK, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed displays impressive home form with an 80% win rate and just 20% draws, remaining unbeaten at home this season. The hosts score an average of 2.27 goals per game while conceding only 0.67, translating into a +24 goal difference in home fixtures. Manisa BBSK shows poor away form, winning only 27% of their road games and conceding 1.87 goals on average while scoring just 1.2. The difference in play quality is also evident in xG stats: Amed generates 1.85 xG per home match compared to their opponents' 1.11 xG, while Manisa records xG for and against values of 1.2 and 1.59 respectively on the road. The form over the last five games also favors the hosts (2.2 PPG vs 1.8 for the visitors). Additionally, Amed has a 47% home clean sheet rate, suggesting defensive solidity. All these factors point to a clear advantage for Amed and a high probability of their victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Amed | Manisa BBSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 22% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Amed · 1.8 pts / game - Manisa BBSK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 37% better for: goals scored per game.
2.1 goals / game - Amed · 1.53 goals / game - Manisa BBSK
Amed is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.07 goals / game - Amed · 1.63 goals / game - Manisa BBSK
Amed scores in 83% of games (25 of 30 meczów), while Manisa BBSK keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 meczów).
Manisa BBSK scores in 77% of games (23 of 30 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Amed
Over / Under - Manisa BBSK
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / game - Amed · 1.3 pts / game - Manisa BBSK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Manisa BBSK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Amed
Manisa BBSK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Amed | Liga | Manisa BBSK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.17 | 2.97 | ▲ 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 28% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 72% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Amed's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Manisa BBSK. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Amed vs Manisa BBSK?
The 1. Lig match finished Amed 2:0 Manisa BBSK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Manisa BBSK?
Amed score 2.10 goals per game on average and Manisa BBSK 1.53. The 1. Lig average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Amed's matches and 57% of Manisa BBSK's.
What form are Amed and Manisa BBSK in?
Over the last 5 games Amed have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Manisa BBSK 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Manisa BBSK?
The statistical background for Amed vs Manisa BBSK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.