Amed vs Sakaryaspor: match statistics
Amed are showing impressive home form with 83% of matches won at home and just 0% losses, scoring an average of 2.58 goals per game while maintaining 42% clean sheets. Sakaryaspor are in dreadful form, losing four of their last five matches and scoring just 1 goal in that period, while conceding 7. The quality difference is evident in the xG statistics, where Amed generate 1.81 xG per home match, while Sakaryaspor only 1.09 xG away, conceding an average of 2.08 goals in away matches. The league position (2nd place Amed vs 18th place Sakaryaspor) and goal difference (+22 vs -7) clearly indicate the hosts' advantage. Considering all these factors, an Amed victory is highly probable, although a draw cannot be completely ruled out due to the unpredictability of football.
Amed vs Sakaryaspor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Amed played against Sakaryaspor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on February 15, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Amed has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Sakaryaspor has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Amed scores 2.21 goals per game and allows 1.17. Sakaryaspor scores 1.33 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of Amed's games and 58% of Sakaryaspor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 54%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.14 per game. Amed takes 15.6 shots per game, while Sakaryaspor takes 10.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Amed leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. Sakaryaspor leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Amed's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For Sakaryaspor, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed are showing impressive home form with 83% of matches won at home and just 0% losses, scoring an average of 2.58 goals per game while maintaining 42% clean sheets. Sakaryaspor are in dreadful form, losing four of their last five matches and scoring just 1 goal in that period, while conceding 7. The quality difference is evident in the xG statistics, where Amed generate 1.81 xG per home match, while Sakaryaspor only 1.09 xG away, conceding an average of 2.08 goals in away matches. The league position (2nd place Amed vs 18th place Sakaryaspor) and goal difference (+22 vs -7) clearly indicate the hosts' advantage. Considering all these factors, an Amed victory is highly probable, although a draw cannot be completely ruled out due to the unpredictability of football.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Amed | Sakaryaspor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 900% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Amed · 0.2 pts / game - Sakaryaspor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 66% better for: goals scored per game.
2.21 goals / game - Amed · 1.33 goals / game - Sakaryaspor
Amed is 61% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.17 goals / game - Amed · 1.88 goals / game - Sakaryaspor
Amed scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 meczów), while Sakaryaspor keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 24 meczów).
Sakaryaspor scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Amed
Over / Under - Sakaryaspor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - Amed · 1.04 pts / game - Sakaryaspor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sakaryaspor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Amed
Sakaryaspor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Amed | Liga | Sakaryaspor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.38 | 2.94 | ▲ 3.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 55% | • 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 72% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 81% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Amed's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sakaryaspor. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Amed vs Sakaryaspor?
The 1. Lig match finished Amed 1:1 Sakaryaspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Amed vs Sakaryaspor?
Amed score 2.21 goals per game on average and Sakaryaspor 1.33. The 1. Lig average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Amed's matches and 58% of Sakaryaspor's.
What form are Amed and Sakaryaspor in?
Over the last 5 games Amed have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Sakaryaspor 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Amed vs Sakaryaspor?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Amed vs Sakaryaspor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.