Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueStadion Soglom AvlodData current as of September 18, 2026

Andijan vs Nasaf: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Andijan vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Andijan plays Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game is scheduled for September 20, 2026. Venue: Stadion Soglom Avlod.

Recent form

Andijan has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Nasaf has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Andijan scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 1.14. Nasaf scores 1.38 and allows 0.95. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Andijan's games and 52% of Nasaf's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 38%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nasaf has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.47 per game. Andijan takes 11.9 shots per game, while Nasaf takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Andijan leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Nasaf leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.76 after halftime.

When the teams score

Andijan's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Nasaf, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.24Goals scored / game1.38
AndijanNasaf
1.14Goals allowed / game0.95
AndijanNasaf
52%Average possession52%
AndijanNasaf
3.95Shots on target / game5.1
AndijanNasaf

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.9Shots per game13.33
AndijanNasaf
3.95Shots on target5.1
AndijanNasaf
10.4%Shot conversion10.4%
AndijanNasaf
52%Possession52%
AndijanNasaf
1.47xG for1.57
AndijanNasaf
1.22xG against1.35
AndijanNasaf

Shooting quality

Andijan: BalancedNasaf: Balanced
AndijanNasaf
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Andijan is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Andijan · 1.2 pts / game - Nasaf

Andijan
LWWLW
Season result split
43% W14% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-9
1.43 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Nasaf
LLLWW
Season result split
38% W33% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-6
1.48 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nasaf is 11% better for: goals scored per game.

1.24 goals / game - Andijan · 1.38 goals / game - Nasaf

Nasaf is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.14 goals / game - Andijan · 0.95 goals / game - Nasaf

Andijan scoring profile: strong

Andijan scores in 62% of games (13 of 21 games), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 games).

Nasaf scoring profile: strong

Nasaf scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 games), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 games).

26Goals scored (season)29
AndijanNasaf
24Goals conceded (season)20
AndijanNasaf
2.38Average goals per game2.33
AndijanNasaf
4Goals scored (last 5)10
AndijanNasaf
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
AndijanNasaf

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal76%
AndijanNasaf
38%2 goals33%
AndijanNasaf
19%3 goals14%
AndijanNasaf
5%4 goals5%
AndijanNasaf

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal67%
AndijanNasaf
33%2 goals24%
AndijanNasaf
19%3 goals5%
AndijanNasaf
0%4 goals0%
AndijanNasaf

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time19%
AndijanNasaf
0%BTTS in both halves5%
AndijanNasaf
19%Scored in both halves24%
AndijanNasaf

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
AndijanNasaf
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
AndijanNasaf
20%BTTS - last 540%
AndijanNasaf

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

48%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
AndijanNasaf
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AndijanNasaf
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
AndijanNasaf

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
AndijanNasaf
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
AndijanNasaf
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
AndijanNasaf

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Andijan - half-time state
19% leading52% draw29% trailing
Nasaf - half-time state
19% leading57% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)1.14
AndijanNasaf
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.62
AndijanNasaf
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
AndijanNasaf
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.05
AndijanNasaf
71%Clean sheet before half-time57%
AndijanNasaf
81%No goal before half-time62%
AndijanNasaf

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per game (2nd half)1.52
AndijanNasaf
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
AndijanNasaf
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
AndijanNasaf
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.29
AndijanNasaf
48%Clean sheet after half-time57%
AndijanNasaf
38%No goal after half-time38%
AndijanNasaf

Andijan - second-half results

52% W14% D33% L
23
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding226%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nasaf - second-half results

33% W52% D14% L
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Andijan - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.80
Goals scored / game0.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.61.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Nasaf - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Andijan
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
2
4
16-30
1
4
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
2
61-75
12
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.35
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Andijan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
46% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
46%

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

AndijanLigaNasaf
Average goals per game 2.382.66 2.33
Both teams scored 33%54% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%53% 38%
Clean sheets 38%27% 33%
Goal before half-time 48%68% 62%
Goal after half-time 90%76% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / game
1.20
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Andijan's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Nasaf. Games average 1.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Nasaf
1 : 0
Andijan
FC Nasaf Qarshi
1 : 1
FK Andijan
FK Andijan
1 : 1
FC Nasaf Qarshi

FAQ

When do Andijan and Nasaf play?

Andijan face Nasaf on September 20, 2026 in Uzbekistan Super League at Stadion Soglom Avlod. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Andijan and Nasaf?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Andijan won 0, Nasaf won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Andijan vs Nasaf?

Andijan score 1.24 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.38. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Andijan's matches and 52% of Nasaf's.

What form are Andijan and Nasaf in?

Over the last 5 games Andijan have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Nasaf 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Andijan vs Nasaf?

The statistical background for Andijan vs Nasaf — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.