Ararat vs Pyunik: match statistics
Ararat vs Pyunik: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ararat played against Pyunik in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Ararat has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Pyunik has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Ararat scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 2.33. Pyunik scores 1.53 and allows 0.74. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Ararat's games and 42% of Pyunik's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 42%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pyunik has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.30 per game. Ararat takes 11.4 shots per game, while Pyunik takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Ararat leads at halftime in 5% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Pyunik leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ararat's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Pyunik, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Armenian Premier League games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pyunik is the clear favorite: they have 13 wins this season and a 60% away win rate, while Ararat has yet to win at home (0% home wins) and loses 80% of home matches. In their last 5 games Pyunik recorded 3 wins and 1 draw (averaging 2 points per match), whereas Ararat has only 1 win and 4 losses (0.6 points per match) and conceded 11 goals in those 5 matches. Offensively Pyunik scores 1.2 goals away on average with xG 1.43 and a 10% conversion rate, while Ararat at home scores 0.6 goals with xG 1.34 and a 5% conversion, indicating superior quality of chances for the visitors. Defensively the gap is decisive: Pyunik concedes 0.8 goals away and keeps 50% clean sheets, whereas Ararat concedes 1.8 goals at home and has only 10% clean sheets and fails to score in 60% of home matches. Considering form stability, better efficiency and significantly lower average goals conceded by the visitors, I forecast a Pyunik victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Ararat has a seasonal goals-per-game average of 1.89 and xG 1.66 with 5.44 shots on target per match, while Pyunik records 1.20 goals and xG 1.43 with 4.2 shots on target, so both sides create chances. Nevertheless both teams frequently keep clean sheets: Ararat has 56% clean sheets, Pyunik 50%, and the league clean sheet rate is 64%, which weakens the BTTS scenario. Seasonal BTTS rates are 33% for Ararat and 50% for Pyunik, with league BTTS at 46%, further indicating that both teams do not score in most fixtures. In the last 5 matches Ararat shows 80% BTTS and concedes on average 2.2 goals, while Pyunik has 20% BTTS and concedes 0.8 on average, so recent form is mixed. Considering the dominant seasonal signal (high clean sheets 56%/50% and Ararat’s low seasonal BTTS 33%), I forecast 'No' (No Goal) with 60% probability versus 40% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data show Ararat scores on average 1.89 goals per match with xG 1.66, while Pyunik averages 1.20 with xG 1.43; after adjustment for opponent xG I arrive at about 1.40 expected goals for Ararat and 1.22 for Pyunik, totaling 2.62 goals. Ararat has scored over 1.5 goals in 78% of matches, Pyunik in 60%, which gives a strong signal for Over 1.5 (I estimate ~85% probability). On the 2.5 line the seasonal values are 44% and 40% for home and away, but Ararat’s last 5 games show 80% Over 2.5, so combining xG and form I give a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (about 56%). The 3.5 line is unlikely — seasonal Over 3.5 is only 11% and 10% — therefore Under 3.5 is safer (around 82%). I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal, with moderate support for Over 2.5 given the expected 2.62 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ararat led at the break in 6 of 9 home matches (67%) and scores an average of 1.11 goals by half-time versus only 0.2 for Pyunik, which strongly indicates a home lead after 45 minutes. Over the full match Ararat has a seasonal goals average of 1.89 versus 1.2, higher xG (1.66 vs 1.43) and higher average points per game (2.33 vs 2.0), so the home advantage generally holds through to full-time and favors their victory. However, Pyunik are more active after the break — the visitors score on average 1.0 goal in the second half while Ararat concedes only 0.44 after half-time, giving the visitors realistic chances for a turnaround and justifying lower shares for 1/2 and X/2 scenarios. One must also account for Ararat’s poorer form in the last 5 matches (1 win, 4 losses, 20% wins in the last 5), which reduces confidence in a win and therefore assigns some weight to draws and second-half turnarounds. Based on these figures the most confident signal is Ararat leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time (1/1) — I assess this scenario at 54%, with smaller shares for 1/X (10%) and 1/2 (8%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ararat | Pyunik | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pyunik is 128% better for: goals scored per game.
0.67 goals / game - Ararat · 1.53 goals / game - Pyunik
Pyunik is 215% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.33 goals / game - Ararat · 0.74 goals / game - Pyunik
Ararat scores in 43% of games (9 of 21 meczów), while Pyunik keeps a clean sheet in 53% (10 of 19 meczów).
Pyunik scores in 89% of games (17 of 19 meczów), while Ararat keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ararat
Over / Under - Pyunik
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pyunik is 168% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.57 pts / game - Ararat · 1.53 pts / game - Pyunik
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ararat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 5%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pyunik - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 68%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ararat
Pyunik
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ararat | Liga | Pyunik | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.52 | ▼ 2.26 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 48% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 32% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 79% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ararat's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Pyunik. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ararat vs Pyunik?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Ararat 1:0 Pyunik. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ararat and Pyunik?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ararat won 0, Pyunik won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ararat vs Pyunik?
Ararat score 0.67 goals per game on average and Pyunik 1.53. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Ararat's matches and 42% of Pyunik's.
What form are Ararat and Pyunik in?
Over the last 5 games Ararat have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Pyunik 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ararat vs Pyunik?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


