Pyunik vs Ararat: match statistics
Pyunik vs Ararat: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pyunik played against Ararat in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Pyunik has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Ararat has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Pyunik scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 0.92. Ararat scores 0.57 and allows 2.50. Games in this league average 2.51 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Pyunik's games and 36% of Ararat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 57%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pyunik has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.38 per game. Pyunik takes 13.4 shots per game, while Ararat takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Pyunik leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Ararat leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pyunik's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Ararat, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Armenian Premier League games average 2.51 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pyunik | Ararat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.16 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Pyunik is 900% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Pyunik · 0.2 pts / game - Ararat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pyunik is 184% better for: goals scored per game.
1.62 goals / game - Pyunik · 0.57 goals / game - Ararat
Pyunik is 172% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.92 goals / game - Pyunik · 2.5 goals / game - Ararat
Pyunik scores in 92% of games (12 of 13 meczów), while Ararat keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 meczów).
Ararat scores in 36% of games (5 of 14 meczów), while Pyunik keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pyunik
Over / Under - Ararat
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pyunik is 142% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - Pyunik · 0.57 pts / game - Ararat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pyunik - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ararat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pyunik
Ararat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pyunik | Liga | Ararat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.54 | 2.51 | ▲ 3.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 49% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 49% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 31% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 71% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 79% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Pyunik's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ararat. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Pyunik vs Ararat?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Pyunik 2:0 Ararat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pyunik vs Ararat?
Pyunik score 1.62 goals per game on average and Ararat 0.57. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Pyunik's matches and 36% of Ararat's.
What form are Pyunik and Ararat in?
Over the last 5 games Pyunik have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ararat 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyunik vs Ararat?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.