Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Arba Minch Kenema vs Hadiya Hosaena: match statistics

Arba Minch Kenema vs Hadiya Hosaena: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arba Minch Kenema play Hadiya Hosaena in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 9 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Arba Minch Kenema: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Hadiya Hosaena: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arba Minch Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Hadiya Hosaena scores 0.82 and concedes 0.92. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arba Minch Kenema 42%, Hadiya Hosaena 47%. Over 2.5: Arba Minch Kenema 29%, Hadiya Hosaena 24%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Arba Minch Kenema has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.04. Arba Minch Kenema: 7.3 shots per match, Hadiya Hosaena: 6.1.

Match halves

Arba Minch Kenema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.39. Hadiya Hosaena: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Arba Minch Kenema: 31-45+ (8 goals). Hadiya Hosaena: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Hadiya Hosaena sit 13th versus Arba Minch Kenema in 20th and have 7 wins, 8 draws and 10 losses with 21 goals scored compared to the hosts’ 4 wins, 10 draws, 11 losses and 18 goals, indicating an edge for the visitors. At home Arba average 0.5 goals, fail to score in 58% of matches and concede 1.5 goals per game, while Hadiya away record shows 0.75 goals, fail to score in 33% of matches and concede only 0.75 goals with 50% clean sheets, giving the visitors a clear defensive advantage. Although Arba register more shots per game (6.73 vs 5.58) and higher possession (53% vs 43%), their shot conversion is 8% versus Hadiya’s 13%, and average xG is 1.12 (Arba) vs 1.01 (Hadiya), meaning the visitors make better use of limited chances. In the last 5 matches Arba have scored 7 goals and average 1.8 points per game (3 wins, 2 losses), whereas Hadiya have 4 goals and 1.0 point per game (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses), so short-term form favors the hosts but does not offset the defensive disparity. Considering Hadiya’s defensive stability (0.75 conceded and 50% clean sheets away) and Arba’s high proportion of goalless games (58%), I forecast a victory for the visitors.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
9Shots1
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
2Shots on target1
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
1.29xG0.69
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
2Corners1
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
80Dangerous attacks75
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
-1Fouls-1
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
-1Cards-1
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
0.79Goals scored / match0.82
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
1.21Goals conceded / match0.92
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
49%Average possession46%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
2.29Shots on target / match2.05
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.26Shots per match6.08
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
2.29Shots on target2.05
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
10.9%Shot conversion13.4%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
49%Possession46%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
1.12xG for1.04
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
1.2xG against1.34
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

Shooting quality

Arba Minch Kenema: BalancedHadiya Hosaena: Counter-attacking
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arba Minch Kenema
WWLLL
Season result split
18% W37% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-17
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-7-11
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Hadiya Hosaena
DLWDD
Season result split
29% W39% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-15-12
1.26 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-7-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hadiya Hosaena is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.92 goals / match - Hadiya Hosaena

Arba Minch Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Arba Minch Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Hadiya Hosaena keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

Hadiya Hosaena scoring profile: strong

Hadiya Hosaena scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Arba Minch Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

30Goals scored (season)31
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
46Goals conceded (season)35
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
2Average goals in match1.74
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
5Goals scored (last 5)3
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal68%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
26%2 goals11%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
0%3 goals3%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
0%4 goals0%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal66%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
32%2 goals24%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
16%3 goals3%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
3%4 goals0%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Arba Minch Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 38 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time18%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
16%Scored in both halves5%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
40%BTTS - last 540%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

2nd half

58%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arba Minch Kenema - half-time state
24% leading34% draw42% trailing
Hadiya Hosaena - half-time state
18% leading53% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.08
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.39
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
1.03Average goals (1st half)0.89
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
53%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
66%No goal before half-time63%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.84
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
58%Clean sheet after half-time66%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena
66%No goal after half-time63%
Arba Minch KenemaHadiya Hosaena

Arba Minch Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
40
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hadiya Hosaena - second-half results

21% W58% R21% P
41
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Arba Minch Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Hadiya Hosaena - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.80.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arba Minch Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
9
16-30
8
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Hadiya Hosaena
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
3
5
16-30
10
7
31-45
3
6
46-60
7
6
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arba Minch Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Hadiya Hosaena

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Arba Minch KenemaLigaHadiya Hosaena
Average goals in match 2.001.78 1.74
Both teams scored 42%40% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%28% 24%
Clean sheets 29%40% 34%
Goal before half-time 71%56% 63%
Goal after half-time 58%59% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arba Minch Kenema 0 - 1 - 0 Hadiya Hosaena. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Arba Minch Kenema vs Hadiya Hosaena?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Arba Minch Kenema 0:1 Hadiya Hosaena. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arba Minch Kenema vs Hadiya Hosaena?

Arba Minch Kenema score 0.79 goals per game on average and Hadiya Hosaena 0.82. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Arba Minch Kenema's matches and 47% of Hadiya Hosaena's.

What form are Arba Minch Kenema and Hadiya Hosaena in?

Over the last 5 games Arba Minch Kenema have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Hadiya Hosaena 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arba Minch Kenema vs Hadiya Hosaena?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.