Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueArba Minch StadiumData current as of 24 July 2026

Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie: match statistics

Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arba Minch Kenema play Shire Endaselassie in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 15 June 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Arba Minch Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Arba Minch Kenema: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Shire Endaselassie: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arba Minch Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Shire Endaselassie scores 0.65 and concedes 0.86. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arba Minch Kenema 42%, Shire Endaselassie 27%. Over 2.5: Arba Minch Kenema 29%, Shire Endaselassie 19%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Arba Minch Kenema has higher xG: 1.12 vs 0.95. Arba Minch Kenema: 7.3 shots per match, Shire Endaselassie: 5.3.

Match halves

Arba Minch Kenema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.39. Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

Arba Minch Kenema: 31-45+ (8 goals). Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a draw: both teams exhibit very low attacking efficiency and a high draw rate — Arba Minch has not won at home (Win% at home 0%) and records 41% draws at their stadium, while Shire has 47% draws on the road. Hosts score an average of 0.59 goals in home matches and concede 1.59, whereas visitors score 0.53 goals away and concede only 1.00, indicating a low-scoring game with better defensive organization from Shire. In terms of chance quality Arba generates slightly more xG and shots: xG at home 1.06 versus 0.93 xG for the visitors and 6.63 average shots vs 5.18, but the conversion rate is low (9% vs 10%) and rarely translates into more goals. In the last 5 matches Arba scored 6 goals with an average of 1.4 points per game, and Shire 3 goals with 1.6 points per game, so form slightly favors the visitors but is not decisive. Considering the hosts’ lack of home wins, the visitors’ superior defensive metrics (1.00 goals conceded away, 35% clean sheets) and the high incidence of draws, a split of the points is the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
11Shots12
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
2Shots on target6
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.08xG1.59
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
3Corners5
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
33Dangerous attacks56
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
19Fouls10
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0Cards0
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.79Goals scored / match0.65
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.21Goals conceded / match0.86
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
49%Average possession45%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
2.29Shots on target / match2.14
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.26Shots per match5.27
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
2.29Shots on target2.14
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
10.9%Shot conversion12.3%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
49%Possession45%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.12xG for0.95
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.2xG against1.24
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Shooting quality

Arba Minch Kenema: BalancedShire Endaselassie: Counter-attacking
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
Accuracy (shots on target)32%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arba Minch Kenema is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 1 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie

Arba Minch Kenema
WWLLL
Season result split
18% W37% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-17
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-7-11
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Shire Endaselassie
DDLWL
Season result split
24% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-14-14
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-8-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arba Minch Kenema is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.65 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie

Shire Endaselassie is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.86 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie

Arba Minch Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Arba Minch Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 41% (15 of 37 matches).

Shire Endaselassie scoring profile: mixed

Shire Endaselassie scores in 46% of matches (17 of 37 matches), while Arba Minch Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

30Goals scored (season)24
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
46Goals conceded (season)32
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
2Average goals in match1.51
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal46%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
26%2 goals14%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0%3 goals5%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0%4 goals0%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal59%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
32%2 goals19%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
16%3 goals5%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
3%4 goals3%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Arba Minch Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 38 matches
27%
Shire Endaselassie - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 37 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
16%Scored in both halves11%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
40%BTTS - last 520%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time51%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

2nd half

58%Min. 1 goal after half-time51%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shire Endaselassie is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 1.27 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie

Arba Minch Kenema - half-time state
24% leading34% draw42% trailing
Shire Endaselassie - half-time state
24% leading54% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.27
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.03Average goals (1st half)0.73
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
53%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
66%No goal before half-time68%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.05
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.51
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.78
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
58%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
66%No goal after half-time76%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Arba Minch Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
40
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shire Endaselassie - second-half results

16% W57% R27% P
47
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arba Minch Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Shire Endaselassie - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arba Minch Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
9
16-30
8
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Shire Endaselassie
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
1
5
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arba Minch Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Shire Endaselassie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Arba Minch KenemaLigaShire Endaselassie
Average goals in match 2.001.78 1.51
Both teams scored 42%40% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%28% 19%
Clean sheets 29%40% 41%
Goal before half-time 71%56% 51%
Goal after half-time 58%59% 51%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arba Minch Kenema 0 - 0 - 1 Shire Endaselassie. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Arba Minch Kenema 2:0 Shire Endaselassie. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

Arba Minch Kenema score 0.79 goals per game on average and Shire Endaselassie 0.65. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Arba Minch Kenema's matches and 27% of Shire Endaselassie's.

What form are Arba Minch Kenema and Shire Endaselassie in?

Over the last 5 games Arba Minch Kenema have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Shire Endaselassie 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.