Asan Mugunghwa vs Cheongju: match statistics
Asan Mugunghwa vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Asan Mugunghwa played against Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Asan Mugunghwa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Cheongju has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.35 goals per game and allows 1.26. Cheongju scores 1.13 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.69 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Asan Mugunghwa's games and 75% of Cheongju's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 54%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Asan Mugunghwa has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.42 per game. Asan Mugunghwa takes 11.7 shots per game, while Cheongju takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Asan Mugunghwa leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. Cheongju leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Asan Mugunghwa's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Cheongju, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.69 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Asan Mugunghwa have a clear edge at home: they win 50% of their home fixtures, score an average of 1.75 goals, and have not been held scoreless in any match there. Cheongju win just 9% of their away games, average 1.18 goals, and fail to score in 27% of those fixtures. The hosts create slightly better chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.34 compared with the visitors’ 1.28, and are also more clinical in front of goal, with a 16% shot conversion rate versus Cheongju’s 12%. Both teams’ recent form has been similarly poor, with each averaging 0.8 points per game across their last five fixtures and conceding 9 goals. The draw remains a significant possibility, as Cheongju draw 73% of their away matches; however, Asan’s attacking edge at home points towards a narrow home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are very high: Asan Mugunghwa has seen both teams score in 77% of its matches, while the figure stands at 73% for Cheongju, compared with the league average of 62%. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 15% of their matches and concede an average of 1.77 goals, which clearly strengthens Cheongju’s chances of scoring. Cheongju, in turn, has failed to score in 27% of its matches, but Asan Mugunghwa also has a weak defense, while the visitors have recently created chances worth 1.52 xG per match. Current form is slightly weaker in attack, as both teams have scored 1.0 and 0.8 goals respectively across their last five matches, but each has conceded as many as 1.8 goals per game during that period. BTTS - Yes therefore remains the most likely scenario, although the main risk to this pick comes from Cheongju’s lower recent scoring efficiency.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: at least two goals were scored in 85% of Asan Mugunghwa’s matches and 82% of Cheongju’s games. The hosts concede an average of 1.77 goals, while Cheongju concede 1.45 away from home, creating favorable conditions for at least two goals. The creative potential is also solid, with average xG figures of 1.54 for the hosts and 1.28 for the visitors, resulting in a combined projection of 2.60 goals. In their last five matches, both teams conceded 1.8 goals per game, despite their attacking output falling to 1.0 and 0.8 goals, respectively. This limits confidence in Over 2.5, but clearly supports the safer Over 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 54% of their matches and the visitors in 36%, while Asan averaged only 0.54 goals scored and Cheongju 0.36 in the first half. Cheongju kept a clean sheet before the break in 64% of matches, while the hosts had not been trailing at half-time in their last five appearances, recording three draws and two leads. The full-time outcome is particularly strongly supported by Cheongju’s record: as many as 73% of their matches ended in a draw, compared with 46% of Asan’s matches. Both teams have similar points-per-game figures across the season—0.92 for the hosts and 1.00 for the visitors—and identical average xG conceded of 1.36, limiting either side’s advantage. Although the second half should be more open, the primary scenario remains an evenly balanced scoreline both at half-time and at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Asan Mugunghwa | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Asan Mugunghwa is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 0.8 pts / game - Cheongju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Asan Mugunghwa is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
1.35 goals / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.13 goals / game - Cheongju
Asan Mugunghwa is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.26 goals / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.63 goals / game - Cheongju
Asan Mugunghwa scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 games), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 games).
Cheongju scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 games), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Asan Mugunghwa
Over / Under - Cheongju
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cheongju is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - Asan Mugunghwa · 1.21 pts / game - Cheongju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Asan Mugunghwa
Cheongju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Asan Mugunghwa | Liga | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.61 | 2.69 | • 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 62% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 52% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 26% | 23% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 68% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 77% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Asan Mugunghwa's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Cheongju. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Asan Mugunghwa vs Cheongju?
The K League 2 match finished Asan Mugunghwa 0:1 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Asan Mugunghwa and Cheongju?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Asan Mugunghwa won 2, Cheongju won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Asan Mugunghwa vs Cheongju?
Asan Mugunghwa score 1.35 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.13. The K League 2 average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Asan Mugunghwa's matches and 75% of Cheongju's.
What form are Asan Mugunghwa and Cheongju in?
Over the last 5 games Asan Mugunghwa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Cheongju 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asan Mugunghwa vs Cheongju?
The statistical background for Asan Mugunghwa vs Cheongju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


