Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 17 July 2026

ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics

ASIL Lysi crest
ASIL Lysi
2 : 1half-time 1:1
MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou

ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ASIL Lysi play MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 17 April 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

ASIL Lysi: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. MEAP Nisou: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

ASIL Lysi scores 1.11 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. MEAP Nisou scores 1.07 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ASIL Lysi 57%, MEAP Nisou 48%. Over 2.5: ASIL Lysi 50%, MEAP Nisou 48%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.32. ASIL Lysi: 7.4 shots per match, MEAP Nisou: 7.5.

Match halves

ASIL Lysi: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.57. MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

ASIL Lysi: 76-90+ (8 goals). MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

MEAP Nisou holds a small but meaningful advantage in chance quality — away xG is 1.51 versus the home side’s 1.22 xG, and visitors average 9.92 shots per match compared to ASIL’s 8.55, giving them more opportunities. Defensively MEAP also performs better: they concede 1.23 goals on average away, while ASIL concedes 1.54 at home; goal difference stands at -2 for MEAP away versus -6 for ASIL at home. Form supports the visitors’ edge — in the last 5 matches MEAP have 1 win and average 0.6 points per game, whereas ASIL have no wins in their last 5 and average only 0.2 points; additionally ASIL have conceded 16 goals in their last 5 home fixtures versus 9 conceded by MEAP in their last five matches. ASIL do have a home finishing advantage — 4.09 shots on target per match and only 23% of home games without a goal, while MEAP fail to score in 38% of away matches, so the hosts have a real chance to score. Considering superior xG (1.51 vs 1.22), more shots (9.92 vs 8.55) and fewer goals conceded (1.23 vs 1.54), I tip an away win, but also expect goals from both sides.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
9Shots9
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
6Shots on target5
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.36xG1.39
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
4Corners6
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
50Dangerous attacks64
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
-1Fouls-1
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
-1Cards-1
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.11Goals scored / match1.07
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.79Goals conceded / match1.72
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
38%Average possession40%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
3.32Shots on target / match2.9
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.39Shots per match7.55
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
3.32Shots on target2.9
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
15%Shot conversion14.2%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
38%Possession40%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.32xG for1.42
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.41xG against1.48
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Shooting quality

ASIL Lysi: Counter-attackingMEAP Nisou: Counter-attacking
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
Accuracy (shots on target)45%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ASIL Lysi is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - ASIL Lysi · 0.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

ASIL Lysi
LDLWL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-14
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 3.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
MEAP Nisou
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W17% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ASIL Lysi scoring profile: very strong

ASIL Lysi scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: very strong

MEAP Nisou scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while ASIL Lysi keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).

31Goals scored (season)31
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
50Goals conceded (season)50
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
2.89Average goals in match2.79
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
10Goals scored (last 5)5
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
17Goals conceded (last 5)10
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal66%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
29%2 goals28%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
4%3 goals10%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
4%4 goals3%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal76%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
39%2 goals52%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
32%3 goals24%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
14%4 goals10%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time31%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
4%BTTS in both halves3%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
14%Scored in both halves17%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
80%BTTS - last 560%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ASIL Lysi is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - ASIL Lysi · 1.03 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

ASIL Lysi - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing
MEAP Nisou - half-time state
21% leading41% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.03
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.62
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.9
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.32Average goals (1st half)1.52
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
46%Clean sheet before half-time34%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
61%No goal before half-time52%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)0.93
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.28
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
50%Clean sheet after half-time48%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou
54%No goal after half-time66%
ASIL LysiMEAP Nisou

ASIL Lysi - second-half results

32% W21% R46% P
32
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

17% W41% R41% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ASIL Lysi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.61.8
Average goals in match2.43.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ASIL Lysi
ScoredConceded
4
10
0-15
4
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
5
7
46-60
3
8
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
6
16-30
8
16
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ASIL Lysi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

ASIL LysiLigaMEAP Nisou
Average goals in match 2.892.72 2.79
Both teams scored 57%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%49% 48%
Clean sheets 21%30% 24%
Goal before half-time 64%72% 83%
Goal after half-time 82%77% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): ASIL Lysi 0 - 2 - 0 MEAP Nisou. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou?

The Second Division match finished ASIL Lysi 2:1 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between ASIL Lysi and MEAP Nisou?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches ASIL Lysi won 0, MEAP Nisou won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou?

ASIL Lysi score 1.11 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.07. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 57% of ASIL Lysi's matches and 48% of MEAP Nisou's.

What form are ASIL Lysi and MEAP Nisou in?

Over the last 5 games ASIL Lysi have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for ASIL Lysi vs MEAP Nisou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.