Athletic Carpi vs Pontedera: match statistics
Athletic Carpi vs Pontedera: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Athletic Carpi played against Pontedera in Serie C Group B (Italy). The game was played on April 3, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Athletic Carpi has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Pontedera has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Athletic Carpi scores 0.94 goals per game and allows 1.31. Pontedera scores 0.81 and allows 1.72. Games in this league average 2.26 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Athletic Carpi's games and 53% of Pontedera's. The Over 2.5 rates are 34% and 44%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Athletic Carpi has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.32 per game. Athletic Carpi takes 12.1 shots per game, while Pontedera takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Athletic Carpi leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Pontedera leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.53 after halftime.
When the teams score
Athletic Carpi's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Pontedera, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group B games average 2.26 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) because Athletic Carpi displays superior home metrics: they score 1.00 goals per match with xG 1.45 and concede only 1.13, whereas Pontedera average 0.81 goals with xG 1.18 and concede 1.81 on the road. Carpi generates more chances — 12.5 shots and 3.31 shots on target per home match versus Pontedera’s 9.5 and 2.81 away — and enjoy higher possession (49% vs 41%), aiding match control. Both teams are in poor form (both 0 wins and 0.4 points per match in the last 5), but the hosts have scored 5 goals in their last 5 compared to Pontedera’s 3, and the visitors have a much worse away record (only 6% wins and a -16 goal difference). Considering Carpi’s defensive and offensive advantages and the high share of home draws (50%), I estimate a 55% probability for a Carpi win, 30% for a draw and 15% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis indicates a bias toward the BTTS (Yes) scenario. Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 50% (Athletic Carpi) and 56% (Pontedera), versus a league average of 50%, providing a moderate basis for both teams to score. In the last 5 matches Carpi recorded BTTS in 80% of games, while Pontedera had 40%; additionally Carpi concedes an average of 2.0 goals in the last 5 and 1.63 over the season, and Pontedera concedes 1.2 in the last 5 and 1.81 for the season, suggesting both sides frequently concede. Low clean sheet rates (13% for Carpi and 6% for Pontedera) and xG showing chance creation (xG 1.46 for Carpi vs 1.18 for Pontedera) combined with low conversion rates (7% and 9%) indicate goals can come from both teams despite poor finishing. Based on this I estimate BTTS probability at 68% versus 32% for No BTTS, therefore I recommend the 'Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams frequently participate in matches with at least 2 goals: Athletic Carpi has 75% of matches Over 1.5, and Pontedera 81%, yielding a historical average of 78%. Based on xG I calculate 1.51 expected goals for the home side (xG attack 1.46 vs Pontedera average xG conceded 1.56) and 1.26 for the away side (xG attack 1.18 vs Carpi average xG conceded 1.33), totaling 2.77 xG for the match. The hosts average 12.5 shots and 3.25 on target, the visitors 9.5 shots and 2.81 on target, and the season-long Both Teams To Score rates are 50% and 56% respectively, which increases the risk of goals from both sides; additionally Carpi have 80% Over 2.5 in their last 5 matches. As a result I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at 82% (Under 18%), Over 2.5 at 58% (Under 42%) and Over 3.5 at 28% (Under 72%). The best and strongest value is Over 1.5 due to the 78% historical incidence of such matches and a higher-than-league xG (expected 2.77 vs league 2.26).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal supporting a draw at half-time is that in the last 5 matches both teams were tied at the break in 60% of cases (last 5: home 60%, away 60%), and first-half goals are low on average: home 0.31 goals, away 0.25. Additionally, the overall chances of either side winning are low — home win rate is only 13%, away 6% — while seasonal draw percentages are 38% (home) and 31% (away), which boosts the probability of a full-time draw. More goals occur after the break: the percentage of matches with at least one goal in the second half is 88% for homes and 81% for aways, but this more often results in shared points than in a decisive turnaround, because home xG is 1.46 versus away 1.18, and average shots on target are 3.25 versus 2.81. Lack of finishing further limits the likelihood of a turnaround — the home shot conversion rate is 7% versus 9% for the away side, and both teams have low points per match (0.75 and 0.5), so the risk that the draw will hold until full-time is material. Therefore the most likely scenario I select is X/X (draw at half-time and draw at full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Athletic Carpi | Pontedera | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Athletic Carpi is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
0.94 goals / game - Athletic Carpi · 0.81 goals / game - Pontedera
Athletic Carpi is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.31 goals / game - Athletic Carpi · 1.72 goals / game - Pontedera
Athletic Carpi scores in 69% of games (22 of 32 meczów), while Pontedera keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 32 meczów).
Pontedera scores in 59% of games (19 of 32 meczów), while Athletic Carpi keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Athletic Carpi
Over / Under - Pontedera
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Athletic Carpi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Pontedera - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 9%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Athletic Carpi
Pontedera
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Athletic Carpi | Liga | Pontedera | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.25 | 2.26 | ▲ 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 34% | 39% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 30% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 66% | 62% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Athletic Carpi's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Pontedera. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Athletic Carpi vs Pontedera?
The Serie C Group B match finished Athletic Carpi 2:0 Pontedera. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Carpi vs Pontedera?
Athletic Carpi score 0.94 goals per game on average and Pontedera 0.81. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Athletic Carpi's matches and 53% of Pontedera's.
What form are Athletic Carpi and Pontedera in?
Over the last 5 games Athletic Carpi have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Pontedera 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Carpi vs Pontedera?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Athletic Carpi vs Pontedera: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


