Athletic Club vs Cuiabá: match statistics
Athletic Club vs Cuiabá: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Athletic Club play Cuiabá in Serie B (Brazil). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 23:00. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Athletic Club: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cuiabá: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Athletic Club scores 0.94 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Cuiabá scores 0.78 and concedes 0.72. League average: 2.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Athletic Club 59%, Cuiabá 28%. Over 2.5: Athletic Club 24%, Cuiabá 17%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 41%.
xG, shots and style
Cuiabá has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.25. Athletic Club: 12.0 shots per match, Cuiabá: 12.7.
Match halves
Athletic Club: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.53. Cuiabá: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Athletic Club: 76-90+ (4 goals). Cuiabá: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 41%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Match description
Athletic Club has a clear advantage in quality of chances — averaging 5.67 shots on target per home match versus Cuiabá’s 2.0 on the road, and higher average xG (1.46 vs 0.84). The hosts have scored 9 goals this season compared to the visitors’ 4; in the last 5 matches Athletic has 6 goals while Cuiabá has 4, with an identical conversion rate of 8% for both teams. Cuiabá’s away defense is very compact — conceding on average 0 goals with 100% clean sheets on the road and 67% of away matches ending in draws, which limits the risk of a heavy defeat for the visitors. In the last 5 fixtures Athletic averages 0.8 points per game and Cuiabá 1.2, yet Athletic’s superiority in xG (1.46 vs 0.84) and shots on target (5.67 vs 2) suggests the hosts are more likely to secure a narrow win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Athletic Club | Cuiabá | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Athletic Club is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - Athletic Club · 0.78 goals / match - Cuiabá
Cuiabá is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Athletic Club · 0.72 goals / match - Cuiabá
Athletic Club scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Cuiabá keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).
Cuiabá scores in 50% of matches (9 of 18 matches), while Athletic Club keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Athletic Club
Over / Under — Cuiabá
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Athletic Club is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Athletic Club · 1.06 pts / match - Cuiabá
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Athletic Club - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cuiabá - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Athletic Club
Cuiabá
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Athletic Club | Liga | Cuiabá | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.88 | 2.27 | ▼ 1.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 47% | ▼ 28% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 41% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 32% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 65% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 74% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Athletic Club 0 - 0 - 2 Cuiabá. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Athletic Club vs Cuiabá?
The Serie B match finished Athletic Club 0:0 Cuiabá. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Athletic Club and Cuiabá?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Athletic Club won 0, Cuiabá won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Club vs Cuiabá?
Athletic Club score 0.94 goals per game on average and Cuiabá 0.78. The Serie B average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Athletic Club's matches and 28% of Cuiabá's.
What form are Athletic Club and Cuiabá in?
Over the last 5 games Athletic Club have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cuiabá 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Club vs Cuiabá?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.