Auda vs Grobiņa: match statistics
Auda vs Grobiņa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Auda played against Grobiņa in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 7, 2026. Final score: 7:0.
Recent form
Auda has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Grobiņa has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Auda scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.20. Grobiņa scores 0.60 and allows 1.10. Games in this league average 2.90 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of Auda's games and 40% of Grobiņa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 10%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.04 per game. Auda takes 13.5 shots per game, while Grobiņa takes 8.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Auda leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.90 goals per game after halftime. Grobiņa leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.30 after halftime.
When the teams score
Auda's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Grobiņa, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.90 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Auda to win (1). The hosts have a clear offensive advantage: 18 goals scored this season versus 6 for the visitors, and 10 goals in Auda’s last 5 matches compared to 3 for the away side; at home Auda averages 1.75 goals per game with 13 shots and 5 on target, and shot conversion is 13% versus 9% for the visitors. Auda also creates more quality chances: 1.65 xG per home game vs 1.29 xG for the visitors away, indicating superiority in chance creation. However, the visitors defend solidly on the road — only 0.6 goals conceded on average and 40% clean sheets, while Auda concedes 1.75 at home and has 0% clean sheets. Considering Auda’s better form (average 2 points in the last 5 matches) and the advantage in goals and xG, I estimate probabilities: Auda 60%, draw 25%, away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back 'YES' (BTTS) with a 72% probability versus 28% for 'No', because recent form and xG indicators favor goals from both sides. Auda has BTTS at 100% in the last 5 matches, scores on average 2.0 goals and concedes 1.6, with average xG of 1.78 versus opponents' xG 0.99 in that run. Grobiņa has a season BTTS rate of 60% (in line with the league 60%), season xG 1.29 and averages 3.8 shots on target per match, while Auda seasonally has xG 0.78 and 1.4 shots on target. Seasonally Auda scores only 0.2 goals per match and has a historical BTTS rate of 20%, and Grobiņa has 40% clean sheets, which weakens the case for 'Yes'. Considering Auda has scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches and Grobiņa concedes on average 1.4 goals in their last 5, the both-teams-to-score scenario looks stronger.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model produces a total expected goals figure of 2.58: Auda 0.96 (attack xG 0.78 and xG against Grobiņa 1.14) and Grobiņa 1.62 (attack xG 1.29 and xG against Auda 1.94). Grobiņa clearly has superior offensive metrics: on average 10.6 shots and 3.8 on target per match versus Auda’s 6.4 and 1.4, which aligns with the visitors’ higher xG (1.29 vs 0.78). In the last 5 matches Auda averaged 2.0 goals (10 goals in 5 matches) and had an average xG of 1.78; Auda’s matches in this period finished OVER 2.5 goals in 80% of cases and both teams scored in 100% of matches, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. Season-to-date both teams have 60% of matches with more than 1.5 goals, and the league average is 2.86 goals per match, so the strongest signal from the data is the Over 1.5 goals market. Therefore I recommend the “Over 1.5 goals” bet as the best line (probability 78%); “Over 2.5” is rated moderately at 62%, and “Over 3.5” at 18%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Grobiņa has a clear quality advantage: xG 1.29 versus 0.78, on average 10.6 shots versus 6.4 and 3.8 shots on target versus 1.4, and scores 1.8 points per match versus Auda’s 0.2. Auda has not led at the break this season (0.0%), while Grobiņa led in 40.0% of matches; average goals by half are 0.0 for Auda and 0.6 for the visitors, so a draw or a visitor lead at half-time is the most likely outcome. Considering the hosts record 60.0% draws at half-time and the visitors have better shot conversion (9.0% vs 3.0%) and a higher season scoring average (1.0 vs 0.2), the safest scenario is Half-Time draw and Grobiņa Full-Time victory (X/2) — I assign 34% to this. The second most likely is 2/2 at 30%, given the visitors’ 40.0% rate of leading at half-time and the difference in average goals scored/conceded (visitors 1.0/0.6, hosts 0.2/1.6). Scenarios in which Auda lead at the break or win received very low shares (8% combined for comebacks/unique wins and 0% historical half-time leads for the hosts), therefore my pick is X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Auda | Grobiņa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Auda is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Auda · 0.6 pts / game - Grobiņa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 200% better for: goals scored per game.
1.8 goals / game - Auda · 0.6 goals / game - Grobiņa
Grobiņa is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - Auda · 1.1 goals / game - Grobiņa
Auda scores in 100% of games (10 of 10 meczów), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).
Grobiņa scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Auda
Over / Under - Grobiņa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / game - Auda · 1.1 pts / game - Grobiņa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Auda - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 70%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Grobiņa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Auda
Grobiņa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Auda | Liga | Grobiņa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.90 | ▼ 1.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 60% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 50% | ▼ 10% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 20% | • 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 90% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 87% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Auda's perspective: 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Grobiņa. Games average 2.40 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Auda vs Grobiņa?
The Virsliga match finished Auda 7:0 Grobiņa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Grobiņa?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 4, Grobiņa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Grobiņa?
Auda score 1.80 goals per game on average and Grobiņa 0.60. The Virsliga average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Auda's matches and 40% of Grobiņa's.
What form are Auda and Grobiņa in?
Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Grobiņa 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Grobiņa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Grobiņa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.