Latvia - VirsligaData current as of September 06, 2026

Auda vs Tukums: match statistics

Auda crest
Auda
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Tukums crest
Tukums

Auda vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Auda played against Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Auda has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Tukums has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Auda scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.25. Tukums scores 1.38 and allows 1.75. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Auda's games and 100% of Tukums's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 63%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.22 per game. Auda takes 13.6 shots per game, while Tukums takes 10.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Auda leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Tukums leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Auda's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Tukums, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda has a clear advantage in control of play and quality of chances: average possession 55% versus 41% for Tukums and higher xG 1.68 vs 1.25, indicating more valuable opportunities for the home side. The hosts average 5.33 shots on target and 13.67 attempts per home match, while the visitors register only 3 on target and 11 attempts away, translating into a greater volume of goalscoring situations for Auda. In the last 5 matches Auda scored 9 goals and averages 2.0 points per game, whereas Tukums has 8 goals and only 0.8 points per game; additionally Auda conceded 7 goals in those 5 fixtures and Tukums 9, showing slightly better defensive form from the hosts. Tukums is more efficient in finishing (shot conversion 15% vs 12% for Auda) and has not had goalless matches (0% of matches without a goal), but they are yet to win away (0 wins, 5 draws, 3 losses this season), which limits their prospects. Considering the superiority in possession, shots on target and xG, alongside better recent results (2.0 vs 0.8 points per game in the last 5), I forecast a home victory, although it should be an open, goalscoring game (combined average 3.67 goals).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 100%, and in the last 5 matches Auda has BTTS 80% versus Tukums 100%, which is a strong indicator that both sides will find the net. This season Auda scores on average 1.2 goals and concedes 1.6 per game, while Tukums scores 1.67 and concedes 2.0, so both teams regularly both score and concede. xG data confirms this picture: Auda has xG 1.2 and allows 1.6 xG, and Tukums has xG 1.25 and allows 1.89 xG — both sides generate around 1.2 xG and concede 1.6–1.9 xG per match. No clean sheets this season (0% for both), average shots on target 4.0 (Auda) and 3.0 (Tukums) and conversion rates of 13% and 15% further increase the likelihood of an exchange of goals. Considering these specific numbers and the form — Auda in the last 5 matches 3W-1D-1L and Tukums 0W-3D-2L — I assign a 92% probability to BTTS - Yes and 8% to No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG estimates give 1.55 for Auda (attacking xG 1.20 vs xG conceded by Tukums 1.89 → average 1.545 ≈ 1.55) and 1.43 for Tukums (attacking xG 1.25 vs xG conceded by Auda 1.60 → 1.425 ≈ 1.43), totaling around 2.98 goals. This is supported by season metrics: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals and 100% BTTS, meaning historically their matches feature at least 2 goals. Over 2.5 occurs in 60% of Auda’s season matches and 67% of Tukums’, and Over 2.5 in the last 5 matches for both teams is 60%, yielding a moderately high probability (~62%) for >2.5 goals. Since the league averages 2.8 goals per game and our expectation is 2.98 (0.18 higher), the strongest and most reliable market is Over 1.5; Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonal 20–33%), so I recommend betting on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X), because the home team draws in 60% of matches, the away team in 67%, and both teams have scored in 100% of games (BTTS 100%). A draw at the break is also common: Auda were level at half-time in 40% of cases, Tukums in 33%, with average first-half goals of 0.4 (Auda) versus 1.0 (Tukums), which suggests scoring draws (e.g. 1:1) in the first 45 minutes. xG is very close (1.2 vs 1.25), and shots 9.4 vs 11.0 with conversion rates of 13% vs 15% indicate balanced chances, so the high draw frequency results from offensive parity. Auda have better form over the last five matches (60% wins vs Tukums 0%) and score on average 0.8 goals after the break compared to Tukums’ 0.67, therefore alternatives are X/1 (16%) and X/2 (11%), but X/X (35%) is the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

64Possession (%)36
AudaTukums
11Shots5
AudaTukums
4Shots on target4
AudaTukums
1.53xG0.86
AudaTukums
4Corners1
AudaTukums
76Dangerous attacks35
AudaTukums
18Fouls18
AudaTukums
4Cards3
AudaTukums

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.75Goals scored / game1.38
AudaTukums
1.25Goals allowed / game1.75
AudaTukums
55%Average possession42%
AudaTukums
5Shots on target / game3.63
AudaTukums

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.63Shots per game10
AudaTukums
5Shots on target3.63
AudaTukums
12.8%Shot conversion13.8%
AudaTukums
55%Possession42%
AudaTukums
1.61xG for1.22
AudaTukums
1.2xG against1.71
AudaTukums

Shooting quality

Auda: BalancedTukums: Counter-attacking
AudaTukums
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Auda is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Auda · 0.8 pts / game - Tukums

Auda
WWLDW
Season result split
63% W13% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-2
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
WLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Tukums
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W63% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-5-3
0.63 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
LDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

1.75 goals / game - Auda · 1.38 goals / game - Tukums

Auda is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Auda · 1.75 goals / game - Tukums

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 meczów), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 meczów).

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 meczów), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 meczów).

14Goals scored (season)11
AudaTukums
10Goals conceded (season)14
AudaTukums
3Average goals per game3.13
AudaTukums
9Goals scored (last 5)8
AudaTukums
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
AudaTukums

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
AudaTukums
63%2 goals25%
AudaTukums
13%3 goals13%
AudaTukums
0%4 goals0%
AudaTukums

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal100%
AudaTukums
38%2 goals63%
AudaTukums
13%3 goals13%
AudaTukums
0%4 goals0%
AudaTukums

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time38%
AudaTukums
0%BTTS in both halves13%
AudaTukums
50%Scored in both halves25%
AudaTukums

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
AudaTukums
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AudaTukums
80%BTTS - last 5100%
AudaTukums

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
AudaTukums
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
AudaTukums
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
AudaTukums

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
AudaTukums
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
AudaTukums
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
AudaTukums

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / game - Auda · 1.13 pts / game - Tukums

Auda - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
Tukums - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per game (1st half)1.13
AudaTukums
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.63
AudaTukums
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
AudaTukums
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.5
AudaTukums
63%Clean sheet before half-time38%
AudaTukums
25%No goal before half-time38%
AudaTukums

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.13
AudaTukums
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
AudaTukums
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
AudaTukums
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.63
AudaTukums
38%Clean sheet after half-time25%
AudaTukums
25%No goal after half-time38%
AudaTukums

Auda - second-half results

25% W63% R13% P
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tukums - second-half results

25% W38% R38% P
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Auda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Auda
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
3
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
88%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

AudaLigaTukums
Average goals per game 3.002.80 3.13
Both teams scored 75%60% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%50% 63%
Clean sheets 25%20% 0%
Goal before half-time 88%78% 88%
Goal after half-time 88%85% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / game
1.55
Away goals / game
+-19%
Home attack advantage
+-24%
Home defensive advantage
+-22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TukumsYellow cardKristers Volkovs
  2. AudaYellow cardDeniss Melniks
  3. TukumsYellow cardKaspars Anmanis
  4. AudaYellow cardWally Fofana
  5. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Rūdolfs MeļķisOff: Dāvis Mārcis Valmiers
  6. AudaSubstitutionOn: Ibrahim Pekegnon KoneOff: Hussaini Ibrahim
  7. TukumsYellow cardRudolfs Reingolcs
  8. AudaYellow cardOskars Rubenis
  9. AudaSubstitutionOn: Meleye DiagneOff: Eduards Daskevics
  10. AudaYellow cardMoussa Ouedraogo
  11. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Renē BaumanisOff: Bogdans Samoilovs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Auda's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Tukums. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.

FK Auda Riga
0 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 4
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

What was the result of Auda vs Tukums?

The Virsliga match finished Auda 2:1 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Tukums?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Auda won 2, Tukums won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Tukums?

Auda score 1.75 goals per game on average and Tukums 1.38. The Virsliga average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Auda's matches and 100% of Tukums's.

What form are Auda and Tukums in?

Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tukums 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Tukums?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Tukums: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.