Auda vs Tukums: match statistics
Auda vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Auda played against Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Auda has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Tukums has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Auda scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.25. Tukums scores 1.38 and allows 1.75. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Auda's games and 100% of Tukums's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 63%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.22 per game. Auda takes 13.6 shots per game, while Tukums takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Auda leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Tukums leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Auda's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Tukums, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Auda has a clear advantage in control of play and quality of chances: average possession 55% versus 41% for Tukums and higher xG 1.68 vs 1.25, indicating more valuable opportunities for the home side. The hosts average 5.33 shots on target and 13.67 attempts per home match, while the visitors register only 3 on target and 11 attempts away, translating into a greater volume of goalscoring situations for Auda. In the last 5 matches Auda scored 9 goals and averages 2.0 points per game, whereas Tukums has 8 goals and only 0.8 points per game; additionally Auda conceded 7 goals in those 5 fixtures and Tukums 9, showing slightly better defensive form from the hosts. Tukums is more efficient in finishing (shot conversion 15% vs 12% for Auda) and has not had goalless matches (0% of matches without a goal), but they are yet to win away (0 wins, 5 draws, 3 losses this season), which limits their prospects. Considering the superiority in possession, shots on target and xG, alongside better recent results (2.0 vs 0.8 points per game in the last 5), I forecast a home victory, although it should be an open, goalscoring game (combined average 3.67 goals).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 100%, and in the last 5 matches Auda has BTTS 80% versus Tukums 100%, which is a strong indicator that both sides will find the net. This season Auda scores on average 1.2 goals and concedes 1.6 per game, while Tukums scores 1.67 and concedes 2.0, so both teams regularly both score and concede. xG data confirms this picture: Auda has xG 1.2 and allows 1.6 xG, and Tukums has xG 1.25 and allows 1.89 xG — both sides generate around 1.2 xG and concede 1.6–1.9 xG per match. No clean sheets this season (0% for both), average shots on target 4.0 (Auda) and 3.0 (Tukums) and conversion rates of 13% and 15% further increase the likelihood of an exchange of goals. Considering these specific numbers and the form — Auda in the last 5 matches 3W-1D-1L and Tukums 0W-3D-2L — I assign a 92% probability to BTTS - Yes and 8% to No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG estimates give 1.55 for Auda (attacking xG 1.20 vs xG conceded by Tukums 1.89 → average 1.545 ≈ 1.55) and 1.43 for Tukums (attacking xG 1.25 vs xG conceded by Auda 1.60 → 1.425 ≈ 1.43), totaling around 2.98 goals. This is supported by season metrics: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals and 100% BTTS, meaning historically their matches feature at least 2 goals. Over 2.5 occurs in 60% of Auda’s season matches and 67% of Tukums’, and Over 2.5 in the last 5 matches for both teams is 60%, yielding a moderately high probability (~62%) for >2.5 goals. Since the league averages 2.8 goals per game and our expectation is 2.98 (0.18 higher), the strongest and most reliable market is Over 1.5; Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonal 20–33%), so I recommend betting on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X), because the home team draws in 60% of matches, the away team in 67%, and both teams have scored in 100% of games (BTTS 100%). A draw at the break is also common: Auda were level at half-time in 40% of cases, Tukums in 33%, with average first-half goals of 0.4 (Auda) versus 1.0 (Tukums), which suggests scoring draws (e.g. 1:1) in the first 45 minutes. xG is very close (1.2 vs 1.25), and shots 9.4 vs 11.0 with conversion rates of 13% vs 15% indicate balanced chances, so the high draw frequency results from offensive parity. Auda have better form over the last five matches (60% wins vs Tukums 0%) and score on average 0.8 goals after the break compared to Tukums’ 0.67, therefore alternatives are X/1 (16%) and X/2 (11%), but X/X (35%) is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Auda | Tukums | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Auda is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Auda · 0.8 pts / game - Tukums
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - Auda · 1.38 goals / game - Tukums
Auda is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Auda · 1.75 goals / game - Tukums
Auda scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 meczów), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 meczów).
Tukums scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 meczów), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Auda
Over / Under - Tukums
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / game - Auda · 1.13 pts / game - Tukums
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Auda - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Tukums - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Auda
Tukums
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Auda | Liga | Tukums | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.80 | ▲ 3.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 60% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 50% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 20% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 78% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 85% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Auda's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Tukums. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Auda vs Tukums?
The Virsliga match finished Auda 2:1 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Tukums?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Auda won 2, Tukums won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Tukums?
Auda score 1.75 goals per game on average and Tukums 1.38. The Virsliga average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Auda's matches and 100% of Tukums's.
What form are Auda and Tukums in?
Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tukums 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Tukums?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Tukums: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


