Italy - Serie C Group CData current as of September 12, 2026

Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli: match statistics

Audace Cerignola crest
Audace Cerignola
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Monopoli crest
Monopoli
135%(1.98)
X35%(3.02)
230%(3.81)

Statistical analysis indicates a very close match between two teams with similar disposition. Audace Cerignola presents slightly better offensive form at home (xG 1.64 vs 1.21 xG Against), yet their home record is poor – barely 27% wins and a negative goal difference (-1). Monopoli impresses with efficiency away with 50% victories and a solid defense (40% clean sheets), but lower xG indicators (1.2) and a lower number of shots on goal (3.4) suggest a more cautious style of play. The recent form of both teams is comparable – hosts with 1.6 PPG, visitors with 1.8 PPG in the last five matches. Considering Monopoli's high efficiency in away matches and Cerignola's instability at home (36% draws), the most probable scenario seems to be a sharing of points, although the hosts have a slight advantage thanks to playing in front of their own crowd.

Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Audace Cerignola played against Monopoli in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on January 25, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Audace Cerignola has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Monopoli has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Audace Cerignola scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.32. Monopoli scores 1.18 and allows 1.18. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Audace Cerignola's games and 55% of Monopoli's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 41%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Audace Cerignola has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.25 per game. Audace Cerignola takes 12.6 shots per game, while Monopoli takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Audace Cerignola leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Monopoli leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.91 after halftime.

When the teams score

Audace Cerignola's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Monopoli, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie C Group C games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a very close match between two teams with similar disposition. Audace Cerignola presents slightly better offensive form at home (xG 1.64 vs 1.21 xG Against), yet their home record is poor – barely 27% wins and a negative goal difference (-1). Monopoli impresses with efficiency away with 50% victories and a solid defense (40% clean sheets), but lower xG indicators (1.2) and a lower number of shots on goal (3.4) suggest a more cautious style of play. The recent form of both teams is comparable – hosts with 1.6 PPG, visitors with 1.8 PPG in the last five matches. Considering Monopoli's high efficiency in away matches and Cerignola's instability at home (36% draws), the most probable scenario seems to be a sharing of points, although the hosts have a slight advantage thanks to playing in front of their own crowd.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
12Shots10
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
4Shots on target4
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
1.38xG1.16
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
4Corners5
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
48Dangerous attacks36
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
13Fouls13
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
3Cards1
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Audace CerignolaMonopoli
1.27Goals scored / game1.18
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
1.32Goals allowed / game1.18
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
47%Average possession51%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
4.64Shots on target / game3.41
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.59Shots per game9.5
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
4.64Shots on target3.41
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
10.1%Shot conversion12.4%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
47%Possession51%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
1.5xG for1.25
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
1.33xG against1.33
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

Shooting quality

Audace Cerignola: BalancedMonopoli: Balanced
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Monopoli is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Audace Cerignola · 1.8 pts / game - Monopoli

Audace Cerignola
DLDWW
Season result split
36% W32% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-7
1.41 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Monopoli
LWWWL
Season result split
41% W27% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-7
1.50 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Audace Cerignola is 8% better for: goals scored per game.

1.27 goals / game - Audace Cerignola · 1.18 goals / game - Monopoli

Monopoli is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.32 goals / game - Audace Cerignola · 1.18 goals / game - Monopoli

Audace Cerignola scoring profile: very strong

Audace Cerignola scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 meczów), while Monopoli keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).

Monopoli scoring profile: strong

Monopoli scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Audace Cerignola keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).

28Goals scored (season)26
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
29Goals conceded (season)26
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
2.59Average goals per game2.36
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal77%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
36%2 goals32%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
14%3 goals9%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
5%4 goals0%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal73%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
41%2 goals32%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
18%3 goals9%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
9%4 goals5%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
Audace Cerignola - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 22 meczów
50%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time9%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
23%Scored in both halves18%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
40%BTTS - last 560%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Audace Cerignola is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / game - Audace Cerignola · 0.91 pts / game - Monopoli

Audace Cerignola - half-time state
18% leading55% draw27% trailing
Monopoli - half-time state
14% leading50% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per game (1st half)0.91
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.27
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.77
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
59%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
59%No goal before half-time77%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per game (2nd half)1.59
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.59
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
50%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli
45%No goal after half-time27%
Audace CerignolaMonopoli

Audace Cerignola - second-half results

36% W32% D32% L
24
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Monopoli - second-half results

41% W36% D23% L
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding293%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Audace Cerignola - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Monopoli - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.00
Goals scored / game0.01.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.22.2
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Audace Cerignola
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
5
16-30
5
4
31-45
7
4
46-60
4
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Monopoli
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
2
5
16-30
2
1
31-45
7
4
46-60
6
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Audace Cerignola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Monopoli

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

Audace CerignolaLigaMonopoli
Average goals per game 2.592.49 2.36
Both teams scored 50%50% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%48% 41%
Clean sheets 36%29% 27%
Goal before half-time 59%66% 59%
Goal after half-time 77%78% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / game
1.05
Away goals / game
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Audace CerignolaYellow cardAlessandro Ligi
  2. MonopoliSubstitutionOn: Lorenzo BordoOff: Riccardo Calcagni
  3. MonopoliYellow cardDiego Ronco
  4. MonopoliSubstitutionOn: Alessandro VinciguerraOff: Mattia Tirelli
  5. Audace CerignolaYellow cardErnesto Ballabile
  6. Audace CerignolaYellow cardLuca Martinelli

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Audace Cerignola's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Monopoli. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Monopoli
2 : 0
Audace Cerignola

FAQ

What was the result of Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli?

The Serie C Group C match finished Audace Cerignola 0:0 Monopoli. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli?

Audace Cerignola score 1.27 goals per game on average and Monopoli 1.18. The Serie C Group C average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Audace Cerignola's matches and 55% of Monopoli's.

What form are Audace Cerignola and Monopoli in?

Over the last 5 games Audace Cerignola have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Monopoli 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli?

The statistical background for Audace Cerignola vs Monopoli — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.