Azam vs Tanzania Prisons: match statistics
Azam vs Tanzania Prisons: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Azam played against Tanzania Prisons in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Venue: Chamazi Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Azam has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Tanzania Prisons has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Azam scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 0.41. Tanzania Prisons scores 0.52 and allows 1.35. Games in this league average 2.10 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 23% of Azam's games and 26% of Tanzania Prisons's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 35%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Azam has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 0.93 per game. Azam takes 9.8 shots per game, while Tanzania Prisons takes 3.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Azam leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Tanzania Prisons leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.22 after halftime.
When the teams score
Azam's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Tanzania Prisons, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.10 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Azam holds a clear advantage: they have scored 31 goals this season and conceded 9, and in the last 5 matches they have scored 10 goals and won 4 of 5 (form: wwwlw), translating to an average of 2.4 points per game over the last 5 matches. At home Azam averages 12.78 shots per game, of which 4.33 are on target, and has an average xG of 1.84 versus xG against 0.81, while Tanzania Prisons on the road register only 8.29 shots, 2.86 on target and xG 1.19. Defensively the hosts look significantly better — an average of 0 goals conceded in home matches and 100% clean sheets at home (no home defeats), whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals away, have a -11 goal difference on the road and only 10% clean sheets. The difference in chance quality and finishing is pronounced: Azam’s home conversion rate is 14% versus 5% for Tanzania Prisons away, and the visitors have 70% of away matches without scoring, which limits their realistic chances of taking points. Based on these numbers I predict a home win (1) — estimated probabilities: Azam win 80%, draw 12%, away win 8%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data and form indicate a low probability of BTTS - Yes: seasonal BTTS Azam 31% and Tanzania Prisons 20% versus league average 34%, meaning both teams are below the league average. Azam have scored 31 and conceded 9 this season (clean sheet in 46% of matches), while Prisons have 12 scored and 31 conceded, indicating a large disparity in the visitors' offensive quality. In the last 5 matches Azam average 2.0 scored and 0.8 conceded per game (10-4 in goals), whereas Prisons only 0.6 scored and 2.0 conceded (3-10), so the away side rarely scores. Efficiency confirms this: Azam have 3.0 shots and 1.0 on target with a 21% conversion, while Prisons average 8.29 shots and 2.86 on target but only 5% conversion; recent xG is 1.89 for Azam versus 0.76 for Prisons. Considering the home side’s 46% clean sheets, Prisons’ low 20% BTTS and the visitors’ poor conversion, a No Goal / clean sheet expected scenario appears more likely (80% vs 20%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.86 goals for Azam and 0.70 for Tanzania Prisons (total 2.56) based on recent xG and form. In their last 5 matches Azam scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) with recent xG 1.89, while Prisons scored 3 goals (0.6) and recent xG 0.76, indicating a clear attacking advantage for the home side. Seasonally Azam have 31 scored and 9 conceded with a seasonal average 0.62, while Prisons have 12 scored and 31 conceded with an average 0.4; additionally Azam convert 21% of shots vs 5% for the opponent, despite Prisons taking more shots (8.29 vs 3.00, shots on target 2.86 vs 1.00). A Poisson model with total 2.56 yields ~72% chance for Over 1.5 (>=2 goals), ~47% for Over 2.5 and ~26% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal from the data is a play on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back a half-time draw and a home win (X/1) — both teams are frequently level at the break: Azam were drawing at half-time in 54% of matches, and Tanzania Prisons in 67%. Azam have a clear advantage in second-half form: in the last five matches they averaged 1.2 goals after the break and won the second half in 60% of cases, whereas Prisons had 0.0 goals after the break in those five games and a 0% second-half win rate. Additionally, the home side are more efficient from outside the box: Azam average 3.0 shots per match and 1.0 on target with a 21% conversion rate, while Prisons register more shots (8.29) and shots on target (2.86) but convert only 5%. Considering form and half-time points (last five: 80% half-time wins for Azam versus 20% for Prisons, HT Points 13 vs 6), the strongest signal is X/1 — draw at the break, home turnaround to win the match (Half-Time/Full-Time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Azam | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Azam is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Azam · 0.8 pts / game - Tanzania Prisons
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Azam is 171% better for: goals scored per game.
1.41 goals / game - Azam · 0.52 goals / game - Tanzania Prisons
Azam is 229% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.41 goals / game - Azam · 1.35 goals / game - Tanzania Prisons
Azam scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 meczów), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 meczów).
Tanzania Prisons scores in 39% of games (9 of 23 meczów), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 77% (17 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Azam
Over / Under - Tanzania Prisons
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.73 pts / game - Azam · 0.87 pts / game - Tanzania Prisons
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Azam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Tanzania Prisons - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Azam
Tanzania Prisons
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Azam | Liga | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.82 | 2.10 | ▼ 1.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 23% | 35% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 38% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 77% | 40% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 57% | • 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 62% | ▼ 52% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- AzamGoalFaisal Salum
- AzamGoalIddy Seleman Nado
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Azam's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Tanzania Prisons. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Azam vs Tanzania Prisons?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Azam 2:0 Tanzania Prisons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Azam vs Tanzania Prisons?
Azam score 1.41 goals per game on average and Tanzania Prisons 0.52. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 23% of Azam's matches and 26% of Tanzania Prisons's.
What form are Azam and Tanzania Prisons in?
Over the last 5 games Azam have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Tanzania Prisons 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Azam vs Tanzania Prisons?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


