Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema: match statistics
Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bahardar played against Sheger Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The game was played on April 20, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Bahardar has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Sheger Ketema has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Bahardar scores 0.74 goals per game and allows 0.70. Sheger Ketema scores 0.92 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 1.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Bahardar's games and 50% of Sheger Ketema's. The Over 2.5 rates are 22% and 27%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 28% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Bahardar has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.18 per game. Bahardar takes 8.4 shots per game, while Sheger Ketema takes 8.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Bahardar leads at halftime in 7% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Sheger Ketema leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.62 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bahardar's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Sheger Ketema, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ethiopia Premier League games average 1.80 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 28% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X): the primary argument is Bahardar’s high home draw rate — 54% of their home matches end in a draw — and a high clean sheet rate of 62%, which makes it difficult for opponents to score. The home defense looks solid: Bahardar concedes only 0.69 goals per home match on average and have allowed a total of 2 goals in their last 5 matches, while Sheger Ketema conceded 4 goals in their last 5 and average 1.08 goals conceded away. The home attack is limited — home goals average 0.85 with 54% of matches without scoring — whereas Sheger have 24 goals this season versus 20 for the hosts and better shot conversion: 12% conversion vs 9%. The xG indicator shows parity (Bahardar xG For 1.35 vs Sheger xG For 1.24), and chance metrics suggest few clear opportunities: 3.31 shots on target per match for the hosts vs 2.5 for the visitors. Considering form (Bahardar 1.8 pts per match in the last 5, Sheger 1.6) and the hosts’ defensive edge, I assign 45% to the draw, 35% to a Bahardar win and 20% to a Sheger Ketema win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Based on xG, both teams recently exceed 1.0: Bahardar has 1.24 xG in the last 5 matches, Sheger 1.39, giving a combined xG of 2.63 which suggests both sides create scoring chances. Seasonally Bahardar has BTTS in 57% of matches and Sheger 42%, but in the last 5 matches guest BTTS is 60% versus 40% for the home side, reinforcing the signal for both teams to score. Additionally, Bahardar averages 1.0 scored and concedes 0.4 in the last 5, while Sheger scores 1.2 and concedes 0.8, showing both teams have recently been both scoring and conceding. Counterarguments are the high clean sheet rates (43% and 42%) and low propensity for matches over 2.5 goals this season (29% and 25%), which reduce BTTS frequency. Balancing these signals (combined xG 2.63, seasonal 57% BTTS for the home team and 60% BTTS for the away team in the last 5), I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 60% versus 40% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.18 expected goals for Bahardar (xG 1.13, opponent concedes on average xG 1.22) and 1.15 for Sheger Ketema (xG 1.24, opponent concedes 1.07), totaling 2.33 goals. With that total, a Poisson distribution implies ~68% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~41% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~21% for over 3.5 goals. Seasonal stats confirm the advantage of the 1.5 line – it was exceeded in 57% of Bahardar’s matches and 58% of Sheger’s, while the 2.5 line occurred in only 29% and 25% of cases. Last 5 matches show Bahardar scoring 5 and conceding 2 (1.0/0.4 avg) and Sheger 6 and 4 (1.2/0.8), slightly lifting scoring rates but not decisively pushing the expected total above 3.0. Given these numbers the strongest signal is Over 1.5, therefore I recommend a bet on Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The half is most likely to end level: Bahardar drew at half-time in 86% of matches and Sheger Ketema in 75%, giving an average of about an 81% chance of a draw at the break. After the break, however, the visitors have the edge — their average goals in the second half are 1.75 versus the hosts’ 0.79, and average goals scored in the 2nd half are 0.83 vs 0.43, indicating greater activity and efficiency from Sheger Ketema after the interval. Additionally, the visitors won 33% of matches compared to 14% for the hosts, have slightly higher xG (1.24 vs 1.13) and more shots per game (9.17 vs 7.29), so they are more likely to tip the result after half-time. Therefore my strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a win for the visitors at full-time (X/2) — I assign this scenario a 42% probability, with the second most likely being draw/draw (X/X) at 30%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bahardar | Sheger Ketema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Bahardar is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Bahardar · 1.6 pts / game - Sheger Ketema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sheger Ketema is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
0.74 goals / game - Bahardar · 0.92 goals / game - Sheger Ketema
Bahardar is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.7 goals / game - Bahardar · 0.92 goals / game - Sheger Ketema
Bahardar scores in 48% of games (13 of 27 meczów), while Sheger Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 meczów).
Sheger Ketema scores in 69% of games (18 of 26 meczów), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 56% (15 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bahardar
Over / Under - Sheger Ketema
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sheger Ketema is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Bahardar · 1.15 pts / game - Sheger Ketema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bahardar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sheger Ketema - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bahardar
Sheger Ketema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Bahardar | Liga | Sheger Ketema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.44 | 1.80 | • 1.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 22% | 28% | • 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 39% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 30% | 55% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 48% | 59% | ▲ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Sheger KetemaGoalBiniyam Fikru
Head-to-head
Record from Bahardar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sheger Ketema. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:2 Sheger Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema?
Bahardar score 0.74 goals per game on average and Sheger Ketema 0.92. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Bahardar's matches and 50% of Sheger Ketema's.
What form are Bahardar and Sheger Ketema in?
Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Sheger Ketema 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Bahardar vs Sheger Ketema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


