Bandırmaspor vs Keçiörengücü: match statistics
Bandırmaspor vs Keçiörengücü: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bandırmaspor played against Keçiörengücü in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: Bandırma 17 Eylül Stadı. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Bandırmaspor has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Keçiörengücü has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Bandırmaspor scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 0.00. Keçiörengücü scores 3.50 and allows 2.50. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Bandırmaspor's games and 100% of Keçiörengücü's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 100%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Keçiörengücü has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.01 per game. Bandırmaspor takes 7.5 shots per game, while Keçiörengücü takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Bandırmaspor leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Keçiörengücü leads at halftime in 50% and scores 2.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bandırmaspor's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Keçiörengücü, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bandırmaspor remain unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws, while conceding just 1 goal during that period. At home, the hosts won their only match so far 3:0, averaging 6 shots on target with 54% possession and keeping a clean sheet. Keçiörengücü do have a strong away xG of 1.85 and average 18 shots per game, but they lost their only away fixture and concede as many as 4 goals per match on the road. The visitors have also been less consistent across their last five appearances, with a record of 3 wins and 2 defeats and 8 goals conceded. Home advantage and a clearly more solid defense favor a Bandırmaspor win, although the opponents’ attacking potential reduces confidence in this pick.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is supported by the complete season indicators: both teams have scored in 100% of their matches so far, and neither has kept a clean sheet. Keçiörengücü have a very strong attacking profile, averaging 2.6 goals and an xG of 1.91 across their last five matches, with 6 shots on target per game. Over the same period, Bandırmaspor conceded just 0.2 goals per match, which clearly limits confidence in the visitors finding the net, although their xG against opponents stands at 1.50. The hosts have averaged 1.4 goals in their last five matches, while Keçiörengücü have conceded 1.6, making a goal from the home side appear likely. However, the BTTS signal is weakened by the fact that only 20% of Bandırmaspor’s matches in the latest sample followed this pattern, as well as by the league-wide BTTS average of 40%, so the advantage of the “Yes” outcome is moderate.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The visitors’ attacking profile is strong: over their last 5 matches, they averaged 2.6 goals, created chances worth 1.91 xG, and recorded 18 shots per game. Over the same period, Bandırmaspor averaged 1.4 goals, while their matches had a defensive character, as the team conceded just 0.2 goals per game. Despite this improvement in the hosts’ defensive performance, the quality-of-chances indicator for opportunities they allowed stands at 1.50 xG, which, combined with Keçiörengücü’s attack, gives the visitors a realistic chance of scoring at least one goal. Both teams exceeded 1.5 goals in 100% of matches in the available seasonal data, while the projected total of 2.80 goals clearly supports the Over 1.5 goals outcome. The Over 1.5 line is safer than Over 2.5, as Bandırmaspor’s last 5 matches produced over 2.5 goals in only 20% of cases.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Bandırmaspor have a clear home advantage: they have won 100% of their matches so far, averaging 4.0 goals scored and conceding just 1.0, while Keçiörengücü have lost 100% of their away fixtures and allow opponents to score 4.0 goals on average. The first half particularly favors the home side, who were leading at the break in their only home match, scoring 2 goals before half-time, while the visitors were behind at half-time in their away fixture and failed to score. Looking at the broader sample of their last five matches, Bandırmaspor remain unbeaten, recording a 60% win rate and conceding just 0.2 goals per game, whereas Keçiörengücü concede 1.6 goals on average. However, the visitors create plenty of chances, with an average xG of 1.85 and 6 shots on target, so their response after the break cannot be completely ruled out. Nevertheless, the strongest scenario remains Bandırmaspor leading at half-time and maintaining their advantage through to full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bandırmaspor | Keçiörengücü | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 53% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.64 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Bandırmaspor is 33% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Bandırmaspor · 1.5 pts / game - Keçiörengücü
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Keçiörengücü is 133% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Bandırmaspor · 3.5 goals / game - Keçiörengücü
Bandırmaspor scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Keçiörengücü keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
Keçiörengücü scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Bandırmaspor keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bandırmaspor
Over / Under - Keçiörengücü
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bandırmaspor is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Bandırmaspor · 1.5 pts / game - Keçiörengücü
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bandırmaspor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Keçiörengücü - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bandırmaspor
Keçiörengücü
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Bandırmaspor | Liga | Keçiörengücü | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.50 | 2.48 | ▲ 6.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 44% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 40% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 100% | 36% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 68% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 68% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Bandırmaspor's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Keçiörengücü. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Bandırmaspor vs Keçiörengücü?
The 1. Lig match finished Bandırmaspor 1:1 Keçiörengücü. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Bandırmaspor and Keçiörengücü?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Bandırmaspor won 0, Keçiörengücü won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Bandırmaspor vs Keçiörengücü?
Bandırmaspor score 1.50 goals per game on average and Keçiörengücü 3.50. The 1. Lig average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Bandırmaspor's matches and 100% of Keçiörengücü's.
What form are Bandırmaspor and Keçiörengücü in?
Over the last 5 games Bandırmaspor have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Keçiörengücü 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bandırmaspor vs Keçiörengücü?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


