Banga vs FA Šiauliai: match statistics
Banga vs FA Šiauliai: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Banga played against FA Šiauliai in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on May 30, 2026. Venue: Gargždų miesto stadionas. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Banga has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. FA Šiauliai has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Banga scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 0.80. FA Šiauliai scores 0.87 and allows 1.47. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Banga's games and 47% of FA Šiauliai's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 40%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Banga has the higher season xG average, 1.40 to 1.34 per game. Banga takes 12.0 shots per game, while FA Šiauliai takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Banga leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. FA Šiauliai leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Banga's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For FA Šiauliai, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Banga sits 4th with 21 goals for and 12 conceded this season, while FA Šiauliai are 9th with 13 scored and 22 conceded. At home Banga averages 1.86 goals, records 3.86 shots on target per game and has a 18% conversion rate, whereas Šiauliai away manage only 0.75 goals per game and a 6% conversion on 4.38 shots on target. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 7 goals and have a 2-2-1 record (1.6 points per game), the visitors scored 4 goals and are 2-0-3 (1.2 points per game). The away side have not won on the road this season (0% away wins) and failed to score in 38% of away matches, and their average away xG against is 1.74 versus Banga’s 1.22 xG against at home, indicating Šiauliai are more susceptible to scoring chances. Considering Banga’s higher efficiency (18% conversion and 1.86 home goals) and superior goal record and form (21–12 vs 13–22 and 1.6 vs 1.2 points per game in the last 5), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project No BTTS (No Goal) because Banga has averaged 1.4 goals scored and only 0.6 conceded in the last 5 matches (last BTTS 20%), indicating improved home defensive form. FA Šiauliai scores 0.75 goals seasonally and concedes 1.13; in their last 5 matches they averaged 0.8 goals with a shots conversion rate of just 6%, which weakens their chance of scoring here. Although Siauliai has a seasonal BTTS rate of 63%, the hosts show only 29% BTTS, and both teams recorded BTTS in just 20% of their last 5 matches — this points toward a match without both teams scoring. Additionally, the league features a high clean sheet rate (65%) and an average goals per game of 2.55; the sides’ xG are similar (1.32 vs 1.36), with Siauliai allowing 1.74 xG seasonally and 1.91 xG in the last 5, i.e. they create chances that do not translate into goals. Based on this I estimate BTTS probability at 35% for "yes" and 65% for "no".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate xG at 1.53 for Banga and 1.41 for FA Šiauliai (total 2.94), calculated from home attack xG 1.32 and away conceded xG 1.74, and correspondingly for the visitors 1.36 and 1.46. This total of 2.94 exceeds the league average of 2.55, increasing the likelihood of crossing both the 1.5 and 2.5 lines. Seasonal stats strongly support Over 1.5: Banga have 86% of matches over 1.5, Šiauliai 63% (average ~75%), so Over 1.5 is the strongest signal. The 2.5 line is more balanced: Banga have 57% of matches over 2.5, Šiauliai 25% (average 41%), but Banga’s higher shot conversion (10% vs 6%) and the fact Šiauliai have conceded 22 goals this season (Banga 12) push the probability of Over 2.5 to around 57%. Over 3.5 looks less likely (seasonal 43% vs 25% and expected 2.94), therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the primary line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Banga very often trails at the break: in 71% of matches they were behind after 45 minutes, conceding on average 1.14 goals by half-time while scoring only 0.14. However, hosts make up ground in the second half — they average 0.86 goals after the break, have a positive second-half goal differential of +1.0 and have scored 4 goals in minutes 76–90, indicating a capacity for a comeback. Šiauliai has 0% wins and 75% draws this season and an xG of 1.36 versus Banga’s 1.32, so even if they lead at the break they often fail to hold the result. Considering Banga wins 43% of home matches and shows superior second-half metrics, the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at half-time followed by the hosts winning at full-time (2/1). I assign this scenario 30% probability; alternatives are draw at half-time and Banga to win (X/1 22%) and a full-time draw (X/X 15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Banga | FA Šiauliai | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Banga is 61% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Banga · 0.87 goals / game - FA Šiauliai
Banga is 84% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.8 goals / game - Banga · 1.47 goals / game - FA Šiauliai
Banga scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while FA Šiauliai keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).
FA Šiauliai scores in 53% of games (8 of 15 meczów), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Banga
Over / Under - FA Šiauliai
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Banga is 145% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / game - Banga · 0.6 pts / game - FA Šiauliai
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Banga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
FA Šiauliai - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Banga
FA Šiauliai
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Banga | Liga | FA Šiauliai | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.20 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 47% | • 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 53% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 32% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 70% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 75% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Banga's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against FA Šiauliai. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Banga vs FA Šiauliai?
The A Lyga match finished Banga 1:1 FA Šiauliai. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Banga and FA Šiauliai?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Banga won 2, FA Šiauliai won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Banga vs FA Šiauliai?
Banga score 1.40 goals per game on average and FA Šiauliai 0.87. The A Lyga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Banga's matches and 47% of FA Šiauliai's.
What form are Banga and FA Šiauliai in?
Over the last 5 games Banga have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FA Šiauliai 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banga vs FA Šiauliai?
The statistical background for Banga vs FA Šiauliai — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.