Banga vs Žalgiris: match statistics
Banga vs Žalgiris: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Banga played against Žalgiris in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on June 20, 2026. Venue: Gargždų miesto stadionas. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Banga has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Žalgiris has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Banga scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 0.72. Žalgiris scores 1.50 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Banga's games and 50% of Žalgiris's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 56%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Žalgiris has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.43 per game. Banga takes 12.4 shots per game, while Žalgiris takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Banga leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Žalgiris leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Banga's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For Žalgiris, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Žalgiris has the edge in form and offense recently: the visitors scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches with 3 wins, while Banga scored only 2 goals and recorded 1 win in the same period. Žalgiris’ defense looks solid away — on average just 0.5 goals conceded per match and 63% clean sheets, compared to Banga’s 1.13 goals conceded and 13% clean sheets at home. Banga, however, can be efficient at home: on average 1.75 goals scored per match from 11.5 shots and 15% conversion, while Žalgiris posts a lower conversion of 7% from 13.75 shots. The xG differential indicates the visitors create better chances — Žalgiris has xG 1.55 away versus Banga’s home xG 1.30 — and the visitors also register higher possession (56% vs 45%) and a higher points-per-game average in the last 5 matches (1.8 vs 1.2). Considering this, I expect an away win, although the score may be modest due to the hosts’ better conversion.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The dominant signal is Žalgiris' defense: a season clean sheet rate of 63% and conceding only 0.5 goals per match on average, with Žalgiris' season BTTS at just 25%. The counterargument is Banga's home attack — season goals average 1.9, 23 goals this season, xG 1.55 and a high conversion rate of 14%, and a home BTTS rate of 70%. However, in the last 5 matches Banga has scored only 2 goals (0.4 per match) and had BTTS at 20%, while Žalgiris has 8 goals in the last 5 (1.6 per match) and recent BTTS 40%, which offsets some of Banga's edge. Additionally, the league context favors clean sheets (the league has 63% of matches with clean sheets and an average of 2.59 goals), and xG against shows opponents create fewer chances versus Žalgiris (xG against Žalgiris 1.24 vs 1.42 against Banga), reducing the likelihood of the away side conceding. Overall, Žalgiris' strong seasonal defensive metrics (63% clean sheets, 0.5 conceded) combined with Banga's weaker attacking form in the last 5 matches point to a 'No' (No BTTS) selection with an estimated probability of 70% vs 30% for BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect approximately 2.90 goals in total (1.55 for Banga, 1.35 for Žalgiris). The basis is average xG: both teams have xG ~1.55, with conceded xG of 1.42 (home) and 1.24 (away), yielding baseline values of ~1.40–1.49 per team before adjustment. Banga at home averages 13.7 shots with 4.4 on target and a 14% conversion rate, while Žalgiris averages 13.75 shots with 3.88 on target and a 7% conversion, which favors the home side when converting chances into goals. The hosts score 1.9 goals at home on average and have 80% of matches over 2.5 goals and 70% BTTS; Žalgiris away averages 1.0 goals and has 63% clean sheets, which suppresses their output. As a result the 2.5 line is the strongest signal — I assign a 68% probability to Over 2.5 (also 88% for Over 1.5 and 36% for Over 3.5) and recommend playing Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Both teams generate identical xG values (1.55 vs 1.55) and a comparable number of shots (13.7 vs 13.75), but Banga shows a clearly superior conversion rate (14% versus 7%) and more shots on target (4.4 vs 3.88), giving the home side a qualitative edge in finishing. In the short term Banga were level at half-time in 3 of 5 matches (60%), while Žalgiris led at the break in 2 of 5 matches (40%), so a draw at half-time is a strong signal. In second halves the hosts average 0.8 goals scored (scored_2hg_avg_home=0.8) and win 40% of second halves (wins_2hg_percentage_home=40.0), whereas Žalgiris more often sees out draws (draws_2hg_percentage_away=63.0) than effects turnarounds. Considering Banga win 50% of home matches versus Žalgiris’s 38% away win rate, the most likely signal is a half-time draw with the home side winning after the break (HT/FT: X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Banga | Žalgiris | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Žalgiris is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Banga · 1.8 pts / game - Žalgiris
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Žalgiris is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.28 goals / game - Banga · 1.5 goals / game - Žalgiris
Banga is 54% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.72 goals / game - Banga · 1.11 goals / game - Žalgiris
Banga scores in 61% of games (11 of 18 meczów), while Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 meczów).
Žalgiris scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Banga
Over / Under - Žalgiris
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Žalgiris is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Banga · 1.56 pts / game - Žalgiris
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Banga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Žalgiris - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Banga
Žalgiris
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Banga | Liga | Žalgiris | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.62 | • 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 39% | 31% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 70% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Banga's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses against Žalgiris. Games average 1.80 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Banga vs Žalgiris?
The A Lyga match finished Banga 3:0 Žalgiris. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Banga and Žalgiris?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Banga won 1, Žalgiris won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Banga vs Žalgiris?
Banga score 1.28 goals per game on average and Žalgiris 1.50. The A Lyga average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Banga's matches and 50% of Žalgiris's.
What form are Banga and Žalgiris in?
Over the last 5 games Banga have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Žalgiris 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banga vs Žalgiris?
The statistical background for Banga vs Žalgiris — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


