Barnet vs Fleetwood Town: match statistics
Barnet vs Fleetwood Town: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Barnet played against Fleetwood Town in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Venue: The Hive Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Barnet has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Fleetwood Town has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Barnet scores 2.33 goals per game and allows 1.50. Fleetwood Town scores 1.17 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Barnet's games and 50% of Fleetwood Town's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 17%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Barnet has the higher season xG average, 1.87 to 1.41 per game. Barnet takes 16.2 shots per game, while Fleetwood Town takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Barnet leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.33 goals per game after halftime. Fleetwood Town leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Barnet's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Fleetwood Town, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Barnet remain unbeaten this season, with a record of 3 wins and 3 draws, while they have won 67% of their home matches. The hosts average 2.33 goals per game at home with an xG of 1.96, whereas Fleetwood Town score an average of 1.33 goals away from home and create chances worth 1.41 xG. Barnet also have a clear edge in chance creation, averaging 16.33 shots and 55% possession, compared with the visitors’ 13 attempts and 42% possession. However, Fleetwood are difficult to beat, having lost none of their matches and drawn 67% of their away fixtures, while also conceding just 1.00 goal per game. Although Barnet’s defense, with no clean sheets and an average of 1.33 goals conceded, gives the visitors a chance to score, the hosts’ greater attacking potential points towards a narrow victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for both teams to score is Barnet’s current form: BTTS occurred in 100% of their last 5 matches, with the team averaging 2.2 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. Fleetwood also show attacking potential, averaging 2.0 goals scored during this period, with BTTS in 60% of matches and 4.67 shots on target per game in the season data. Both sides create comparable-quality chances, as their average xG stands at 1.41 each, while Fleetwood’s defense allows an average of 1.65 xG. The risk to this pick is Barnet’s very strong home defense, which keeps a clean sheet in 67% of matches and concedes just 0.33 goals per game; therefore, the BTTS - Yes scenario does not hold a clear edge. Nevertheless, the hosts’ recent run and Fleetwood’s attacking numbers slightly favor the outcome in which both teams score at least once.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Barnet has a solid foundation for scoring, creating an average of 1.41 xG, while Fleetwood allows an average of 1.65 xG. However, the hosts have scored just 1.00 goal per game in their league matches so far. Fleetwood averages 1.33 goals and 1.41 xG per match, but Barnet’s defense concedes only 0.33 goals on average and has kept a clean sheet in 67% of its matches. Season-long results clearly support a limited number of goals: Barnet has not gone Over 2.5 goals in any match, while the Under 3.5 goals line has landed in 100% of its games and 67% of Fleetwood’s. Barnet’s last five appearances have been more open, averaging 3.8 total goals with 80% of matches going Over 2.5, although Fleetwood conceded only 0.8 goals per game during this period. The projected total of 2.73 goals points to a realistic chance of three goals, but the 3.5 line gives a clear advantage to the Under.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as both teams have drawn 67% of their league matches so far and neither has suffered a defeat. At half-time, Barnet and Fleetwood have each led, drawn and trailed once, representing 33% for each of the three outcomes and therefore no clear early advantage. The hosts concede just 0.33 goals per match at home and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their appearances, while Fleetwood score an average of 1.33 goals but have an xG of 1.41 against opponents’ xG of 1.65. In their last five matches, both teams recorded draws in 60% of games, reinforcing the forecast of an evenly balanced finish. Although Barnet have home advantage, the identical average of 1.67 points per match and the draw-oriented profile of both sides point more strongly to an X/X outcome than to either team securing the win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Barnet | Fleetwood Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Barnet is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Barnet · 1.4 pts / game - Fleetwood Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barnet is 99% better for: goals scored per game.
2.33 goals / game - Barnet · 1.17 goals / game - Fleetwood Town
Fleetwood Town is 124% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Barnet · 0.67 goals / game - Fleetwood Town
Barnet scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Fleetwood Town keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).
Fleetwood Town scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Barnet
Over / Under - Fleetwood Town
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnet is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.83 pts / game - Barnet · 1.33 pts / game - Fleetwood Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Barnet - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Fleetwood Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Barnet
Fleetwood Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Barnet | Liga | Fleetwood Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.83 | 2.64 | ▼ 1.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 47% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 27% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Barnet's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Fleetwood Town. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Barnet vs Fleetwood Town?
The EFL League Two match finished Barnet 3:1 Fleetwood Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Barnet and Fleetwood Town?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Barnet won 1, Fleetwood Town won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Barnet vs Fleetwood Town?
Barnet score 2.33 goals per game on average and Fleetwood Town 1.17. The EFL League Two average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Barnet's matches and 50% of Fleetwood Town's.
What form are Barnet and Fleetwood Town in?
Over the last 5 games Barnet have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Fleetwood Town 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Barnet vs Fleetwood Town?
The statistical background for Barnet vs Fleetwood Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


