Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Beitar / Riga Mariners play Tukums II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 9 August 2026.
Current form
Beitar / Riga Mariners: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tukums II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Beitar / Riga Mariners scores 2.00 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Tukums II scores 1.27 and concedes 2.73. League average: 3.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Beitar / Riga Mariners 60%, Tukums II 73%. Over 2.5: Beitar / Riga Mariners 60%, Tukums II 67%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.
xG, shots and style
Beitar / Riga Mariners has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.52. Beitar / Riga Mariners: 11.7 shots per match, Tukums II: 10.5.
Match halves
Beitar / Riga Mariners: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 1.07. Tukums II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
Beitar / Riga Mariners: 0-15 (7 goals). Tukums II: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.49 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 33%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Beitar / Riga Mariners | Tukums II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beitar / Riga Mariners is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 0.8 pts / match - Tukums II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beitar / Riga Mariners is 57% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.27 goals / match - Tukums II
Beitar / Riga Mariners is 214% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.87 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 2.73 goals / match - Tukums II
Beitar / Riga Mariners scores in 100% of matches (15 of 15 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
Tukums II scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Beitar / Riga Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Beitar / Riga Mariners
Over / Under — Tukums II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beitar / Riga Mariners is 179% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.87 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 0.67 pts / match - Tukums II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beitar / Riga Mariners - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tukums II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -9 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Beitar / Riga Mariners
Tukums II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Beitar / Riga Mariners | Liga | Tukums II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.87 | 3.49 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 60% | 63% | ▲ 73% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 21% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 85% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Beitar / Riga Mariners 3 - 0 - 0 Tukums II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
When do Beitar / Riga Mariners and Tukums II play?
Beitar / Riga Mariners face Tukums II on 9 August 2026 in 1. Liga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Beitar / Riga Mariners and Tukums II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Beitar / Riga Mariners won 3, Tukums II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II?
Beitar / Riga Mariners score 2.00 goals per game on average and Tukums II 1.27. The 1. Liga average is 3.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's matches and 73% of Tukums II's.
What form are Beitar / Riga Mariners and Tukums II in?
Over the last 5 games Beitar / Riga Mariners have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tukums II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.