Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 20 July 2026

BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: match statistics

BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

BFC Daugavpils play Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 16 June 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

BFC Daugavpils: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Super Nova: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

BFC Daugavpils scores 1.26 and concedes 1.26 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.05 and concedes 1.59. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: BFC Daugavpils 57%, Super Nova 64%. Over 2.5: BFC Daugavpils 43%, Super Nova 59%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

BFC Daugavpils has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.15. BFC Daugavpils: 12.7 shots per match, Super Nova: 8.6.

Match halves

BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.87. Super Nova: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (13 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 0-3-2. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 80%.

Match description

BFC Daugavpils holds a slight edge in chance creation — home xG for the hosts is 1.5 versus Super Nova’s 1.19 xG, with averages of 12.0 shots and 4.56 shots on target per game compared to the visitors’ 8.8 and 3.7. At the same time Super Nova is more efficient in finishing: conversion rate is 11% versus the hosts’ 8%, and only 30% of their away matches end goalless while the hosts fail to score in 44% of home games. In the last 5 fixtures BFC has scored 6 goals and recorded a 1-2-2 record, averaging 1.0 point per game, while Super Nova has scored 7 goals with a 2-0-3 record and 1.2 points per game. Defensively the teams are very similar — both have conceded 25 goals this season; the hosts concede 1.0 goal on average at home, the visitors 1.2 on the road, so the defensive edge is minimal. Considering the higher xG and greater shot volume for the hosts but better efficiency from Super Nova, I expect a narrow home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
17Shots9
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
5Shots on target1
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.84xG1.26
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
7Corners1
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
60Dangerous attacks86
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
13Fouls11
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0Cards0
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.26Goals scored / match1.05
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.26Goals conceded / match1.59
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
47%Average possession45%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
4.78Shots on target / match3.45
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.74Shots per match8.64
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
4.78Shots on target3.45
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
9.9%Shot conversion12.1%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
47%Possession45%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.54xG for1.15
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.61xG against1.68
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Shooting quality

BFC Daugavpils: BalancedSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)38%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

BFC Daugavpils is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 0.8 pts / match - Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils
WDLWW
Season result split
35% W26% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Super Nova
DLLWL
Season result split
32% W14% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-12
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BFC Daugavpils is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.05 goals / match - Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.26 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.59 goals / match - Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: very strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

29Goals scored (season)23
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
29Goals conceded (season)35
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
2.52Average goals in match2.64
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
9Goals scored (last 5)4
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal77%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
30%2 goals23%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
17%3 goals5%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
4%4 goals0%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal82%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
26%2 goals50%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
17%3 goals14%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
9%4 goals9%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time32%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
22%Scored in both halves9%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
40%BTTS - last 560%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BFC Daugavpils is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.05 pts / match - Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
26% leading52% draw22% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.05
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.59
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.7Average goals (1st half)1.45
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
74%Clean sheet before half-time50%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
70%No goal before half-time55%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.14
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.18
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
30%Clean sheet after half-time45%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
35%No goal after half-time59%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

22% W48% R30% P
30
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova - second-half results

32% W18% R50% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BFC Daugavpils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
13
10
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
3
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

BFC DaugavpilsLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 2.523.01 2.64
Both teams scored 57%57% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%56% 59%
Clean sheets 26%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 52%76% 64%
Goal after half-time 87%85% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): BFC Daugavpils 0 - 3 - 2 Super Nova. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
0 : 1
SK Super Nova
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
2 : 2
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
SK Super Nova
4 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 1
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished BFC Daugavpils 0:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between BFC Daugavpils and Super Nova?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches BFC Daugavpils won 0, Super Nova won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?

BFC Daugavpils score 1.26 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.05. The Virsliga average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 57% of BFC Daugavpils's matches and 64% of Super Nova's.

What form are BFC Daugavpils and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games BFC Daugavpils have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Super Nova 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.