Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of September 13, 2026

Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

Bhayangkara crest
Bhayangkara
2 : 1half-time 0:1
PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Bhayangkara played against PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on April 17, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Bhayangkara has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. PSIM Yogyakarta has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Bhayangkara scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.15. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.33 and allows 1.30. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 52% of Bhayangkara's games and 52% of PSIM Yogyakarta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 52%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.28 per game. Bhayangkara takes 10.4 shots per game, while PSIM Yogyakarta takes 13.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Bhayangkara leads at halftime in 48% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.93 after halftime.

When the teams score

Bhayangkara's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For PSIM Yogyakarta, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Bhayangkara holds a clear advantage in form and efficiency: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and are averaging 2.4 points per game in that span, whereas PSIM in their last 5 have only 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses and 1.0 point per game. Both teams have 36 goals this season, but Bhayangkara at home score on average 1.62 goals and concede 0.77 per match, while PSIM score 1.36 away and concede 1.21, giving a distinct defensive edge to the hosts. The visitors enjoy more possession (55% vs 47%) and more shots per game (12.93 vs 11.46) and more shots on target (4.57 vs 3.62), but convert only 10% of their chances versus the hosts’ 14% and more often finish matches goalless (36% vs 8%). xG metrics show PSIM create 1.52 xG per game against Bhayangkara’s 1.41, however they also concede 1.55 xG versus the hosts’ 1.05, so the visitors generate quality chances but are vulnerable to conceding. Considering Bhayangkara’s 62% home win rate, superior 14% conversion and current form (2.4 pts/last 5), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes because seasonal signals and form indicate goals at both ends: Bhayangkara has a season BTTS of 62%, PSIM 43%, but in the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60% of cases. xG and shot numbers confirm chance creation – xG for 1.61 (Bhayangkara) and 1.52 (PSIM), xG against 1.26 and 1.55, and shots on target 4.08 and 4.57, which suggests clear scoring opportunities for both sides. In the last 5 fixtures Bhayangkara scored 12 goals (2.4 avg) and conceded 5 (1.0), while PSIM scored 7 (1.4) and conceded 7 (1.4), so hosts are stronger offensively but visitors also concede. Counterarguments are PSIM’s 36% matches without a goal and seasonal average goals 1.36 and 1.31, which reduce certainty; however the league posts BTTS 56% and over2.5 around 50–54%, so the balance points to a higher probability of both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG calculations: expected goals 1.58 for Bhayangkara and 1.39 for PSIM, total 2.97. Seasonally Bhayangkara has attacking xG 1.61 and 77% of matches with over 1.5 goals, PSIM has attacking xG 1.52 and 71% of such matches; in the last 5 matches Bhayangkara averaged 2.4 goals versus 1.4 for PSIM, which confirms a goals trend. A Poisson model with mean 2.97 gives roughly an 80% chance of Over 1.5 (P(0)+P(1) ≈20%), about 57% for Over 2.5 and 35% for Over 3.5. Consequently I recommend betting on Over 1.5 as the strongest and most data-driven pick; Over 2.5 is a moderate option (~57%), while Over 3.5 is relatively risky (~35%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I predict a draw at half-time because the home team drew at the break in 38% of matches and the away team in 71%; additionally, clean sheets at half-time occurred for the home side in 54% and for the visitors in 64% of fixtures, supporting goalless or low-scoring first halves. First-half goal averages are low (AVGHT: home 1.00 vs away 0.79) with mean goals scored by half of 0.38 (home) and 0.43 (away), so an HT draw is likely. After the break I expect a home advantage: in their last five matches they won 80% of games, in second halves they averaged 1.8 goals scored and 0.2 conceded, while the visitors average 0.8 scored and 1.0 conceded in second halves. Second halves are also more goal-rich (AVG_2hg: home 1.69 vs away 1.79) and in 85–86% of cases at least one goal is scored after the break, which supports a turnaround in favor of the home team. For these reasons the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
12Shots17
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7Shots on target6
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.59xG1.88
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
5Corners5
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
47Dangerous attacks55
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
18Fouls10
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
2Cards1
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.33Goals scored / game1.33
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.15Goals allowed / game1.3
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
45%Average possession58%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
3.48Shots on target / game4.33
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.37Shots per game13.11
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
3.48Shots on target4.33
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
12.9%Shot conversion10.2%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
45%Possession58%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.28xG for1.56
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.31xG against1.41
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Bhayangkara: Counter-attackingPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Bhayangkara is 140% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Bhayangkara · 1 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara
WWWWL
Season result split
48% W19% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-9
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
PSIM Yogyakarta
WDDLL
Season result split
33% W41% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-7
1.41 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bhayangkara is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.15 goals / game - Bhayangkara · 1.3 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara scoring profile: very strong

Bhayangkara scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 meczów).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 74% of games (20 of 27 meczów), while Bhayangkara keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 meczów).

36Goals scored (season)36
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
31Goals conceded (season)35
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
2.48Average goals per game2.63
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
12Goals scored (last 5)7
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal74%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
37%2 goals41%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
11%3 goals15%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7%4 goals4%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal67%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
30%2 goals44%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
11%3 goals15%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
4%4 goals4%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time19%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7%BTTS in both halves7%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
30%Scored in both halves19%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
60%BTTS - last 560%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bhayangkara is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Bhayangkara · 1.11 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara - half-time state
48% leading22% draw30% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
19% leading56% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)1.11
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.41
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.19Average goals (1st half)0.89
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
59%Clean sheet before half-time59%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
44%No goal before half-time70%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per game (2nd half)1.52
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.74
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
52%Clean sheet after half-time44%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta
48%No goal after half-time37%
BhayangkaraPSIM Yogyakarta

Bhayangkara - second-half results

33% W41% D26% L
45
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

41% W30% D30% L
30
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Bhayangkara - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.403.00
Goals scored / game0.61.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Bhayangkara
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
7
10
31-45
7
3
46-60
2
7
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
5
5
46-60
11
5
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Bhayangkara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

BhayangkaraLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals per game 2.482.73 2.63
Both teams scored 52%56% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%53% 52%
Clean sheets 30%26% 33%
Goal before half-time 85%70% 52%
Goal after half-time 78%83% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / game
1.17
Away goals / game
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BhayangkaraGoalNehar SadikiAssist: Moussa Sidibé
  2. BhayangkaraGoalMoussa SidibéAssist: Moisés Wolschick
  3. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardReva Adi Utama
  4. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Andi IrfanOff: Reva Adi Utama
  5. BhayangkaraYellow cardSho Yamamoto
  6. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Muhammad Rendra Teddy WijanarkoOff: Andy Setyo Nugroho
  7. BhayangkaraYellow cardMoisés Wolschick

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Candra CandraMatches officiated: 12
4.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 283%Home wins17%Draws0%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Bhayangkara's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against PSIM Yogyakarta. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Bhayangkara 2:1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Bhayangkara score 1.33 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.33. The Liga 1 average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Bhayangkara's matches and 52% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Bhayangkara and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Bhayangkara have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bhayangkara vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.