Slovenia - 2. SNLStadion V dolinciData current as of October 16, 2026

Bilje vs Dekani: match statistics

Bilje crest
Bilje
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Dekani crest
Dekani

Bilje vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Bilje played against Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on October 6, 2026. Venue: Stadion V dolinci. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Bilje has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Dekani has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Bilje scores 1.88 goals per game and allows 2.13. Dekani scores 0.75 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Bilje's games and 13% of Dekani's. The Over 2.5 rates are 88% and 25%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Bilje has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.48 per game. Bilje takes 11.0 shots per game, while Dekani takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Bilje leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Dekani leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

Bilje's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Dekani, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

2. SNL games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Bilje have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 12 goals, while Dekani managed just 4 over the same period. At home, the hosts average 1.75 goals per match, whereas the visitors score only 0.67 away from home and have failed to find the net in 67% of those matches. However, Dekani are more solid defensively: they concede an average of 0.67 goals away from home, compared with Bilje's 1.75 at home, which limits the hosts' advantage. The quality of the chances created is almost identical — average xG stands at 1.53 for Bilje at home and 1.54 for Dekani away — but the hosts have been far more clinical in converting their chances into goals. I therefore predict a Bilje win, although the visitors' defense and the fact that the hosts have lost 50% of their home matches point to a closely contested game.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to at least one team failing to score: Bilje kept a clean sheet in 80% of its home matches, while Dekani failed to score in 67% of its away games. The hosts also struggle for goals at times, having drawn a blank in 60% of their home matches and averaging 0.8 goals, while the visitors average 0.67 goals away from home. BTTS - Yes has not landed in any of Bilje’s home matches to date, and this has happened in 33% of Dekani’s away games. One counterpoint is Bilje’s recent form: across five matches, they averaged 2.4 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, increasing the likelihood of both teams finding the net. Despite the hosts’ improvement, Dekani’s frequent failure to score and Bilje’s high clean-sheet rate make BTTS - No the more likely outcome. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily imply a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been breached in Bilje’s home matches or Dekani’s away matches, and their average goals scored are 0.8 and 0.67, respectively. Bilje kept a clean sheet in 80% of their home matches, limiting the visitors’ scoring prospects. However, caution is warranted: Bilje averaged 2.4 goals scored across their last 5 matches, and at least 3 goals were scored in 80% of those games. Despite this uptick in attacking form, the projected total of 2.35 goals makes the 3.5-goal line a stronger option than the lower 2.5-goal line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Bilje led at the break in 40% of their home matches, while Dekani have not led at half-time away from home and went into the break trailing in 33% of their matches. The hosts concede an average of 0.2 goals before half-time, compared with 0.67 for the visitors, which points to an early Bilje lead. Across their last five matches, regardless of venue, Bilje scored an average of 2.4 goals, compared with Dekani’s 0.8, giving the hosts stronger credentials to win the match overall. Dekani score an average of just 0.33 goals after the break away from home, so recovering from a potential deficit could prove difficult. A half-time draw remains a significant risk, having occurred in 67% of Dekani’s away matches; overall, however, the data most strongly support Bilje leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
BiljeDekani
10Shots10
BiljeDekani
5Shots on target3
BiljeDekani
1.37xG1.49
BiljeDekani
2Corners6
BiljeDekani
51Dangerous attacks88
BiljeDekani
27Fouls17
BiljeDekani
0Cards0
BiljeDekani

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.88Goals scored / game0.75
BiljeDekani
2.13Goals allowed / game0.5
BiljeDekani
46%Average possession49%
BiljeDekani
4.75Shots on target / game3.5
BiljeDekani

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game12
BiljeDekani
4.75Shots on target3.5
BiljeDekani
17%Shot conversion6.3%
BiljeDekani
46%Possession49%
BiljeDekani
1.5xG for1.48
BiljeDekani
1.68xG against1.13
BiljeDekani

Shooting quality

Bilje: Counter-attackingDekani: Balanced
BiljeDekani
Accuracy (shots on target)43%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Dekani is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Bilje · 1.8 pts / game - Dekani

Bilje
LWWLL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-4
1.50 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 at home
2-0-2
WLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Dekani
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
38% W38% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-2
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bilje is 151% better for: goals scored per game.

1.88 goals / game - Bilje · 0.75 goals / game - Dekani

Dekani is 326% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.13 goals / game - Bilje · 0.5 goals / game - Dekani

Bilje scoring profile: strong

Bilje scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 games), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 games).

Dekani scoring profile: strong

Dekani scores in 38% of games (3 of 8 games), while Bilje keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 games).

15Goals scored (season)6
BiljeDekani
17Goals conceded (season)4
BiljeDekani
4Average goals per game1.25
BiljeDekani
9Goals scored (last 5)3
BiljeDekani
11Goals conceded (last 5)1
BiljeDekani

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal38%
BiljeDekani
50%2 goals25%
BiljeDekani
38%3 goals13%
BiljeDekani
13%4 goals0%
BiljeDekani

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal38%
BiljeDekani
63%2 goals13%
BiljeDekani
38%3 goals0%
BiljeDekani
25%4 goals0%
BiljeDekani

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time13%
BiljeDekani
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BiljeDekani
38%Scored in both halves25%
BiljeDekani

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
BiljeDekani
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
BiljeDekani
60%BTTS - last 520%
BiljeDekani

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
BiljeDekani
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
BiljeDekani
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
BiljeDekani

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time38%
BiljeDekani
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
BiljeDekani
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
BiljeDekani

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bilje is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / game - Bilje · 1.25 pts / game - Dekani

Bilje - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
Dekani - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per game (1st half)1.25
BiljeDekani
1.25Goals scored (1st half)0.5
BiljeDekani
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
BiljeDekani
1.88Average goals (1st half)0.88
BiljeDekani
50%Clean sheet before half-time63%
BiljeDekani
25%No goal before half-time63%
BiljeDekani

After half-time (2nd half)

0.63Points per game (2nd half)1.38
BiljeDekani
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
BiljeDekani
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.13
BiljeDekani
2.13Average goals (2nd half)0.38
BiljeDekani
13%Clean sheet after half-time88%
BiljeDekani
50%No goal after half-time75%
BiljeDekani

Bilje - second-half results

13% W25% D63% L
14
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.9

Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Dekani - second-half results

25% W63% D13% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Bilje - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game1.40.4
Goals allowed / game1.01.2
Average goals per game2.41.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Dekani - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.0
Average goals per game0.60.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Bilje
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
8
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Bilje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
27%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

BiljeLigaDekani
Average goals per game▲ 4.002.97▼ 1.25
Both teams scored▲ 75%46%▼ 13%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 88%58%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▼ 13%32%▲ 63%
Goal before half-time▲ 88%73%▼ 63%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%79%▼ 38%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.85
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+64%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defensive advantage
+37%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Bilje's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Dekani. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

NK Jadran Dekani
2 : 2
NK Bilje
NK Bilje
0 : 0
NK Jadran Dekani

FAQ

What was the result of Bilje vs Dekani?

The 2. SNL match finished Bilje 2:0 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Bilje and Dekani?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Bilje won 0, Dekani won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Bilje vs Dekani?

Bilje score 1.88 goals per game on average and Dekani 0.75. The 2. SNL average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Bilje's matches and 13% of Dekani's.

What form are Bilje and Dekani in?

Over the last 5 games Bilje have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Dekani 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bilje vs Dekani?

The statistical background for Bilje vs Dekani — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.