Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 17 July 2026

Dekani vs Bilje: match statistics

Dekani crest
Dekani
2 : 2half-time 2:2
Bilje crest
Bilje

Dekani vs Bilje: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dekani play Bilje in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Dekani: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Bilje: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dekani scores 1.33 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Bilje scores 0.90 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dekani 53%, Bilje 43%. Over 2.5: Dekani 53%, Bilje 43%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Dekani has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.19. Dekani: 9.4 shots per match, Bilje: 9.1.

Match halves

Dekani: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.63. Bilje: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Dekani: 16-30 (12 goals). Bilje: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Dekani have the edge in attack and efficiency at home: they score an average of 1.55 goals per home match with a conversion rate of 17% and 3.27 shots on target, while Bilje score only 0.73 goals away with an 8% conversion and 3.18 shots on target. Defensively the gap is even larger — Dekani concede 1.45 goals at home, whereas Bilje concede as many as 2.64 goals away, i.e. 1.19 goals more per game; Bilje also record only 9% clean sheets compared to the hosts' 27%. xG metrics are similar in attack (Dekani xG 1.28 vs Bilje xG 1.20), but Bilje allow a higher opponent xG (1.68 vs Dekani 1.26), confirming their vulnerability to dangerous situations. The last 5 matches yield both teams 1.4 points per game, however Dekani’s home stats (home win rate 45%, home goal difference +1) versus Bilje’s poor away form (away win rate 18%, goal difference -21) favor the hosts. Considering better conversion (17% vs 8%), a lower share of matches without scoring (27% vs 36%) and Bilje’s significantly worse away defence, I expect a Dekani win.

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
DekaniBilje
7Shots3
DekaniBilje
5Shots on target3
DekaniBilje
1.11xG0.68
DekaniBilje
4Corners2
DekaniBilje
43Dangerous attacks36
DekaniBilje
-1Fouls-1
DekaniBilje
-1Cards-1
DekaniBilje

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match0.9
DekaniBilje
1.53Goals conceded / match1.57
DekaniBilje
45%Average possession44%
DekaniBilje
3.67Shots on target / match3.57
DekaniBilje

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.37Shots per match9.07
DekaniBilje
3.67Shots on target3.57
DekaniBilje
14.2%Shot conversion9.9%
DekaniBilje
45%Possession44%
DekaniBilje
1.32xG for1.19
DekaniBilje
1.33xG against1.44
DekaniBilje

Shooting quality

Dekani: Counter-attackingBilje: Balanced
DekaniBilje
Accuracy (shots on target)39%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dekani is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Dekani · 0.6 pts / match - Bilje

Dekani
DLWDW
Season result split
27% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-13
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-6
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Bilje
LLLWL
Season result split
30% W23% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dekani is 48% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Dekani · 0.9 goals / match - Bilje

Dekani scoring profile: strong

Dekani scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Bilje keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Bilje scoring profile: strong

Bilje scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

40Goals scored (season)27
DekaniBilje
46Goals conceded (season)47
DekaniBilje
2.87Average goals in match2.47
DekaniBilje
12Goals scored (last 5)3
DekaniBilje
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
DekaniBilje

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal53%
DekaniBilje
40%2 goals30%
DekaniBilje
20%3 goals7%
DekaniBilje
7%4 goals0%
DekaniBilje

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal80%
DekaniBilje
50%2 goals27%
DekaniBilje
13%3 goals17%
DekaniBilje
3%4 goals10%
DekaniBilje

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time10%
DekaniBilje
3%BTTS in both halves3%
DekaniBilje
23%Scored in both halves13%
DekaniBilje

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
DekaniBilje
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
DekaniBilje
80%BTTS - last 520%
DekaniBilje

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
DekaniBilje
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
DekaniBilje
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
DekaniBilje

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
DekaniBilje
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
DekaniBilje
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
DekaniBilje

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dekani is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Dekani · 0.97 pts / match - Bilje

Dekani - half-time state
23% leading37% draw40% trailing
Bilje - half-time state
17% leading47% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)0.97
DekaniBilje
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.37
DekaniBilje
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
DekaniBilje
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.1
DekaniBilje
37%Clean sheet before half-time53%
DekaniBilje
60%No goal before half-time73%
DekaniBilje

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.03
DekaniBilje
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
DekaniBilje
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
DekaniBilje
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.37
DekaniBilje
47%Clean sheet after half-time43%
DekaniBilje
53%No goal after half-time60%
DekaniBilje

Dekani - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
32
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bilje - second-half results

23% W33% R43% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dekani - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.61.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Bilje - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
12
6
16-30
4
12
31-45
9
8
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Bilje
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
5
10
16-30
6
7
31-45
7
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Bilje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

DekaniLigaBilje
Average goals in match 2.872.82 2.47
Both teams scored 53%50% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%54% 43%
Clean sheets 13%28% 20%
Goal before half-time 77%74% 63%
Goal after half-time 83%81% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dekani 0 - 1 - 0 Bilje. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

NK Bilje
0 : 0
NK Jadran Dekani

FAQ

What was the result of Dekani vs Bilje?

The 2. SNL match finished Dekani 2:2 Bilje. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dekani vs Bilje?

Dekani score 1.33 goals per game on average and Bilje 0.90. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Dekani's matches and 43% of Bilje's.

What form are Dekani and Bilje in?

Over the last 5 games Dekani have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Bilje 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dekani vs Bilje?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.