Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers: match statistics
Birmingham City presents a clear advantage as the host with a 47% home win rate and an impressive +13 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts record an average of 1.82 goals per home match with only 6% of games without scoring, which proves their solid offense. Queens Park Rangers has a poor away form with a 39% defeat rate and a negative -11 goal difference, scoring an average of only 0.94 goals on the road. The xG statistics also favor Birmingham (1.89 vs 1.20), confirming their superiority in creating chances. Even though the last 5 matches for both teams have not been successful, Birmingham maintains greater stability on their home turf and should exploit the defensive weaknesses of the visitors, who concede an average of 1.56 goals away from home.
Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Birmingham City played against Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The game was played on March 11, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Birmingham City has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Queens Park Rangers has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Birmingham City scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 1.31. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.28 and allows 1.61. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Birmingham City's games and 64% of Queens Park Rangers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 64%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Birmingham City has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.40 per game. Birmingham City takes 13.8 shots per game, while Queens Park Rangers takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Birmingham City leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Queens Park Rangers leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.72 after halftime.
When the teams score
Birmingham City's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Queens Park Rangers, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Birmingham City presents a clear advantage as the host with a 47% home win rate and an impressive +13 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts record an average of 1.82 goals per home match with only 6% of games without scoring, which proves their solid offense. Queens Park Rangers has a poor away form with a 39% defeat rate and a negative -11 goal difference, scoring an average of only 0.94 goals on the road. The xG statistics also favor Birmingham (1.89 vs 1.20), confirming their superiority in creating chances. Even though the last 5 matches for both teams have not been successful, Birmingham maintains greater stability on their home turf and should exploit the defensive weaknesses of the visitors, who concede an average of 1.56 goals away from home.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Birmingham City | Queens Park Rangers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Birmingham City is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Birmingham City · 0.6 pts / game - Queens Park Rangers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Birmingham City is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.31 goals / game - Birmingham City · 1.61 goals / game - Queens Park Rangers
Birmingham City scores in 75% of games (27 of 36 meczów), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 meczów).
Queens Park Rangers scores in 75% of games (27 of 36 meczów), while Birmingham City keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Birmingham City
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Birmingham City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Birmingham City
Queens Park Rangers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Birmingham City | Liga | Queens Park Rangers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.58 | 2.60 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 56% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 51% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 25% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 71% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Birmingham City's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Queens Park Rangers. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?
The Championship match finished Birmingham City 1:0 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?
Birmingham City score 1.28 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.28. The Championship average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Birmingham City's matches and 64% of Queens Park Rangers's.
What form are Birmingham City and Queens Park Rangers in?
Over the last 5 games Birmingham City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.