Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: match statistics
Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Birmingham City played against Wolverhampton Wanderers in Championship (England). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: St. Andrew's Stadium. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Birmingham City has 1 win, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.50 points per game. Wolverhampton Wanderers has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.75 points per game.
Scoring records
Birmingham City scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.00. Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 2.75 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.85 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Birmingham City's games and 100% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 100%, compared with league averages of 66% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wolverhampton Wanderers has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.24 per game. Birmingham City takes 10.8 shots per game, while Wolverhampton Wanderers takes 17.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Birmingham City leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Wolverhampton Wanderers leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Birmingham City's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Wolverhampton Wanderers, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 2.85 goals. Both teams score in 66% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wolverhampton Wanderers sit higher in the table, in 5th place compared with Birmingham in 8th, and have collected 10 points from their last five matches thanks to 3 wins, while the hosts have managed only 6 points. The visitors have been impressive in front of goal: they have scored 13 goals in their last five games and average 2.5 goals per away match, with an xG of 1.64. Birmingham are unbeaten at home, but both of their matches so far have ended in draws, while their average xG of 1.34 is lower than their opponents’ figure. Wolves also create more chances, averaging 16.5 shots and 4 on target away from home, compared with Birmingham’s 12 shots and 3 on target at home. Neither defense is particularly solid — the hosts concede an average of 1.5 goals at home, while the visitors concede 2.5 away — so Birmingham should have a chance to score, but the greater attacking potential points to the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a 100% BTTS rate this season, and neither has kept a clean sheet or failed to score in a match yet. Birmingham average 3.0 goals scored and 1.5 conceded, while Wolverhampton average 2.5 goals scored and 2.5 conceded per match. The current form also strongly supports BTTS - Yes: in their last five matches, BTTS occurred in 80% of cases for each team, with Birmingham conceding an average of 2.0 goals and Wolves 1.6. Their attacking potential is confirmed by xG figures of 1.88 for the hosts and 1.64 for the visitors, while Wolverhampton have scored as many as 13 goals in their last five matches. Even Birmingham’s weaker recent average of 1.2 goals and an xG of 1.15 is supported by the visitors’ defense, which concedes 1.6 goals per match, making it more likely that both teams will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams clearly favors goals: in the current competition, the average number of goals in Birmingham matches is 4.5, compared with 5.0 for Wolverhampton. Each team has surpassed the 1.5-goal and 2.5-goal lines in 100% of matches so far, while both have regularly scored and conceded at least one goal. In their last five matches, Wolverhampton averaged 2.6 goals scored, while Birmingham conceded 2.0, significantly increasing the visitors’ attacking potential. The hosts have averaged 1.15 xG over their last five appearances, while their opponents allow 1.25 xG, making a goal for Birmingham a realistic scenario as well. Over 1.5 goals has the strongest statistical backing, as the expected total of 3.20 goals provides a substantial margin even if the match is less open than the teams’ previous fixtures.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Wolverhampton are showing clearly better current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 win for Birmingham, while their average goals scored stand at 2.6 and 1.2 respectively. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their recent matches and averaged 1.4 goals scored before half-time, whereas the hosts took the lead in only 20% of cases, scoring 0.6 goals in this phase. Birmingham conceded an average of 1.0 goals before half-time, compared with 0.8 for Wolves, further strengthening the scenario of an away advantage in the first half. After the interval, Wolves still have the more favourable record, averaging 1.2 goals scored and recording a positive goal difference of +2 in their last five appearances, compared with Birmingham’s 0.6 goals. The most likely outcome is therefore a Wolverhampton lead at half-time followed by a win at full-time: HT/FT 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Birmingham City | Wolverhampton Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.58 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Wolverhampton Wanderers is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.5 pts / game - Birmingham City · 1.75 pts / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wolverhampton Wanderers is 120% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Birmingham City · 2.75 goals / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Birmingham City is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Birmingham City · 2 goals / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Birmingham City scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Birmingham City keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Birmingham City
Over / Under - Wolverhampton Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wolverhampton Wanderers is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Birmingham City · 1.75 pts / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Birmingham City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.25 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 25% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.75 | 1.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.3 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 75% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 25% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Birmingham City
Wolverhampton Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Birmingham City | Liga | Wolverhampton Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.25 | 2.85 | ▲ 4.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 66% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 64% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
The Championship match finished Birmingham City 2:2 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
Birmingham City score 1.25 goals per game on average and Wolverhampton Wanderers 2.75. The Championship average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Birmingham City's matches and 100% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's.
What form are Birmingham City and Wolverhampton Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games Birmingham City have a 1-3-0 record (1.50 points per game) and Wolverhampton Wanderers 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Birmingham City vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


