Blooming vs Aurora: match statistics
Blooming vs Aurora: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Blooming played against Aurora in LFPB (Bolivia). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: Estadio Ramón Aguilera Costas. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Blooming has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Aurora has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Blooming scores 1.21 goals per game and allows 1.14. Aurora scores 1.64 and allows 1.36. Games in this league average 3.04 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Blooming's games and 79% of Aurora's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 43%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Aurora has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.46 per game. Blooming takes 14.1 shots per game, while Aurora takes 14.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Blooming leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.36 goals per game after halftime. Aurora leads at halftime in 21% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Blooming's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Aurora, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LFPB games average 3.04 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Blooming remain unbeaten at home: they have won 43% of their matches, drawn 57%, and concede just 0.43 goals per game on average, keeping a clean sheet in 57% of their appearances. The hosts also create more chances on their own ground, averaging 15.57 shots and an xG of 1.63, compared with Aurora’s 12.57 shots and xG of 1.33 away from home. Aurora sit higher in the table and have scored 9 goals in their last five matches, but they win only 29% of their away games and draw as many as 57% of them. Blooming’s recent form is weaker, having scored just 2 goals in five matches; however, home advantage and a highly consistent defense point to a slight edge for the hosts. Nevertheless, the high draw rates of both teams make a stalemate a very realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score comes primarily from Blooming’s defense, which concedes an average of 1.86 goals at home and has kept no clean sheets. Aurora has averaged 1.8 goals in its last five matches, recorded BTTS in 100% of games, and created chances worth 1.93 xG, making its goal highly realistic. Across the entire home season, Blooming has averaged 2.29 goals, with 1.84 xG and 6.86 shots on target per match, while Aurora allows chances worth 1.52 xG away from home. However, the hosts’ current form increases the risk for this pick: they have scored only 2 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.4 per game, with BTTS occurring in just 20% of those fixtures. Despite this attacking weakness, Blooming should create enough chances against an Aurora side that has conceded an average of 2.0 goals in its last five matches, which is why the BTTS - Yes scenario is slightly more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as Blooming’s home matches have exceeded this line in 100% of cases, compared with 86% for Aurora. Blooming have kept a clean sheet in none of their home matches and concede an average of 1.86 goals, which supports Aurora’s scoring chances, with the visitors averaging 1.8 goals over their last five matches and posting an xG of 1.93. Across the entire home season, the hosts average 2.29 goals scored and create chances worth 1.84 xG, although their recent run has been clearly weaker, with an average of just 0.4 goals scored. Aurora’s defense has conceded 2.0 goals per game over their last five matches, so even with a more cautious assessment of Blooming’s form, the total projection of 2.75 goals clearly favors at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: Aurora were level at the break in 71% of their matches, compared with 57% for Blooming. The visitors are particularly cautious before half-time, averaging just 0.29 goals scored and 0.29 conceded, while Blooming have scored only 0.4 goals before the break on average across their last five matches. After the interval, the form advantage shifts towards Aurora: in their last five appearances, they averaged 1.0 goal in the second half, while Blooming failed to score in that period. The hosts lost 60% of second halves during this period, whereas Aurora remained unbeaten in 80% of their last five matches and conceded an average of 1.0 fewer goals per game than their opponents based on current form. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an Aurora win best combines the visitors’ cautious start with Blooming’s significantly weaker attacking efficiency after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Blooming | Aurora | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Aurora is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Blooming · 1.2 pts / game - Aurora
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aurora is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
1.21 goals / game - Blooming · 1.64 goals / game - Aurora
Blooming is 19% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.14 goals / game - Blooming · 1.36 goals / game - Aurora
Blooming scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 games), while Aurora keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 games).
Aurora scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 games), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blooming
Over / Under - Aurora
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.86 pts / game - Blooming · 1.29 pts / game - Aurora
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Aurora - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Blooming
Aurora
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Blooming | Liga | Aurora | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.36 | 3.04 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 65% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 63% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 22% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 73% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 86% | • 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Blooming's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Aurora. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Blooming vs Aurora?
The LFPB match finished Blooming 3:0 Aurora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blooming and Aurora?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blooming won 1, Aurora won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blooming vs Aurora?
Blooming score 1.21 goals per game on average and Aurora 1.64. The LFPB average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Blooming's matches and 79% of Aurora's.
What form are Blooming and Aurora in?
Over the last 5 games Blooming have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Aurora 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blooming vs Aurora?
The statistical background for Blooming vs Aurora — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.