Blooming vs The Strongest: match statistics
Blooming vs The Strongest: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Blooming played against The Strongest in LFPB (Bolivia). The game was played on July 26, 2026. Venue: Estadio Ramón Aguilera Costas. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Blooming has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. The Strongest has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Blooming scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 1.10. The Strongest scores 1.50 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 3.14 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Blooming's games and 60% of The Strongest's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 67% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The Strongest has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.60 per game. Blooming takes 15.1 shots per game, while The Strongest takes 16.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Blooming leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. The Strongest leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Blooming's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For The Strongest, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LFPB games average 3.14 goals. Both teams score in 67% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Blooming has a clear home advantage: scores on average 1.8 goals per game and concedes only 0.4, records 6.8 shots on target and xG 1.8, indicating high quality of created chances. The Strongest away averages 1.2 goals scored and concedes 0.6 with xG 1.57, and sit 2nd in the table with a record of 6 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses. Both teams have identical possession (56%) and a similar total shot count (16.6 vs 16.4), but Blooming converts better (11% efficiency vs 7%) and registers more shots on target (6.8 vs 4.6). In the last 5 matches The Strongest scored 4 and conceded 2 (averaging 1.8 points per game), while Blooming scored 3 and conceded 6 (averaging 1.4 points per game), which favors the visitors in terms of defensive form. Considering Blooming’s unbeaten home record (0% losses), 60% clean sheets and superior goal-area efficiency, I predict a narrow home win, with moderate risk of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal xG values suggest expected goals of around 1.55 for Blooming (xG attack 1.74 and xG against 1.37) and 1.45 for The Strongest (xG attack 1.57 and xG against 1.33), which in a simple Poisson model yields an approximate probability of BTTS - Yes of about 60%. Seasonally Blooming have BTTS at 80% while The Strongest have 40% and the league average BTTS is 65%, which generally supports the 'yes' scenario. However, in the last 5 matches Blooming have only 20% BTTS and average 0.6 goals (3 in 5), whereas The Strongest have 40% BTTS and 0.8 goals (4 in 5), lowering short-term expectations for both teams. Additionally The Strongest have kept a clean sheet in 60% of seasonal appearances versus 20% for Blooming and are conceding on average 0.4 goals per match recently, which works against BTTS. Considering strong xG signals and seasonal shots metrics (5.4 vs 4.6 shots on target) alongside intersecting but ambiguous form trends, I recommend 'BTTS - Yes' with a 60% probability versus 40% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive metrics I calculated expected goals: (1.74 + 1.37)/2 = 1.56 for Blooming and (1.57 + 1.33)/2 = 1.45 for The Strongest, yielding a total expected goals of 3.01. Seasonal averages confirm offensive potential — Blooming scores 1.8 goals per game, The Strongest 1.2, and the league average is 3.09; Blooming has 80% of matches Over 1.5 and 60% Over 2.5, while The Strongest have 40% and 40% respectively. In the last 5 matches Blooming scored 3 and conceded 6, and The Strongest scored 4 and conceded 2, indicating a dip in Blooming’s scoring form and greater defensive stability from The Strongest. A Poisson model with λ=3.01 yields probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈80%, Over 2.5 ≈58% and Over 3.5 ≈35%; considering Blooming’s higher finishing efficiency (conversion 10% vs 7%) and shot volume (17.2 vs 16.4), the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a draw at half-time with Blooming winning the match (X/1). Blooming drew at half-time in 4 of their last 5 home games (drawingAtHT_home = 4, 80%), and The Strongest had a half-time draw in 3 of 5 away matches (drawingAtHT_away = 3, 60%), which strongly supports a draw in the first half. In the second half the home side is more active – Blooming average 1.0 goals after the break versus 0.6 for The Strongest (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0 vs scored_2hg_avg_away = 0.6) and have a higher AVG_2hg (1.4 vs 0.6), so they are more likely to turn the game around after the interval. Additionally, Blooming have higher xG (1.74 vs 1.57), more shots on target (5.4 vs 4.6) and a higher average goals per match (2.8 vs 1.8), which is why I assigned the highest probability to the X/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Blooming | The Strongest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
The Strongest is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Blooming · 1.8 pts / game - The Strongest
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Blooming is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.6 goals / game - Blooming · 1.5 goals / game - The Strongest
The Strongest is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Blooming · 0.8 goals / game - The Strongest
Blooming scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 meczów), while The Strongest keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 meczów).
The Strongest scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blooming
Over / Under - The Strongest
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.2 pts / game - Blooming · 1.3 pts / game - The Strongest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 40%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
The Strongest - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Blooming
The Strongest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Blooming | Liga | The Strongest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.70 | 3.14 | ▼ 2.30 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 60% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 20% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 87% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Blooming's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against The Strongest. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Blooming vs The Strongest?
The LFPB match finished Blooming 1:1 The Strongest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blooming and The Strongest?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Blooming won 1, The Strongest won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blooming vs The Strongest?
Blooming score 1.60 goals per game on average and The Strongest 1.50. The LFPB average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Blooming's matches and 60% of The Strongest's.
What form are Blooming and The Strongest in?
Over the last 5 games Blooming have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and The Strongest 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blooming vs The Strongest?
The statistical background for Blooming vs The Strongest — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.