Bravo vs Mura: match statistics
Bravo vs Mura: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bravo played against Mura in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Stadion Stožice. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Bravo has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Mura has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Bravo scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.33. Mura scores 1.33 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Bravo's games and 67% of Mura's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Bravo has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.55 per game. Bravo takes 14.3 shots per game, while Mura takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Bravo leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Mura leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bravo's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Mura, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
PrvaLiga games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mura have a clear offensive edge away from home: they average 2.0 goals per match, while Bravo average just 0.5 at home. The visitors also record an average of 7 shots on target per game compared with 3 for the hosts, and they have yet to finish an away match without scoring; Bravo have failed to score in 50% of their home fixtures. However, Mura’s defense remains vulnerable, conceding 2.67 goals per away match and keeping no clean sheets, which boosts the hosts’ chances of finding the net. Bravo have also failed to keep a clean sheet at home, while their average xG against stands at 1.82, so the visitors’ more effective attack should prevail in a match where both teams are likely to score. Mura also have a slightly better recent points record, averaging 1.2 points per game over their last five rounds compared with Bravo’s 1.0.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by Mura’s very weak defense, having yet to keep a clean sheet, conceding an average of 2.67 goals and allowing opponents an xG of 1.38. Bravo have scored just 0.67 goals per match this season, but their recent attacking form has improved to 1.0 goal per game, while BTTS landed in 80% of their last five matches. Mura are clearly more dangerous in attack, averaging 2.0 goals, 1.86 xG and 7 shots on target per match, whereas Bravo conceded 1.6 goals in their last five matches, with an opposition xG of 1.94. The visitors have seen BTTS in 100% of their matches this season and 60% of their last five, while both teams conceded an average of 1.6 and 2.0 goals per match, respectively, across those recent runs. Despite Bravo’s weaker season-long scoring record, the combination of the hosts’ attacking strength and Mura’s lack of clean sheets makes a Goal/Goal scenario more likely than No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Mura demonstrate clear attacking potential: they average 2.00 goals, create chances worth 1.86 xG, and register 7.0 shots on target per match. Bravo’s defense allows opponents 1.37 xG, while they have conceded an average of 1.60 goals in their last five matches, supporting the likelihood of at least one away goal. The hosts score just 0.67 goals per match, but their average of 1.24 xG, along with 1.27 xG across their last five appearances, indicates a realistic chance of adding a goal of their own against a Mura side conceding an average of 2.67 goals. Over 1.5 goals has landed in all of Mura’s matches and in 60% of the last five meetings involving both teams, while the projected total of 2.78 goals provides a clear margin of safety for this line. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as even with Bravo’s lower attacking efficiency, Mura’s offensive profile and the defensive vulnerabilities of both sides significantly reduce the likelihood of a match finishing with no more than one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Mura have the stronger attacking profile, scoring an average of 2.00 goals per match with an xG of 1.86, while Bravo score just 0.67 goals and generate xG of 1.24. The visitors led at the break in 2 of their 3 matches so far, equivalent to 67% of games, while Bravo have scored before half-time just 0.33 times on average. Mura’s superiority is not beyond doubt, however, as they concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, while over their last five appearances the two teams have conceded 2.00 and 1.60 goals respectively. The 2/2 outcome therefore remains the most likely: Mura should capitalise on their superior chance creation in the first half, and their attack gives them the best chance of preserving the lead until full-time despite the risk of conceding.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bravo | Mura | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mura is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Bravo · 1.2 pts / game - Mura
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mura is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Bravo · 1.33 goals / game - Mura
Bravo is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Bravo · 2 goals / game - Mura
Bravo scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).
Mura scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bravo
Over / Under - Mura
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bravo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mura - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bravo
Mura
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Bravo | Liga | Mura | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.33 | 2.43 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 40% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 30% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 83% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Bravo's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Mura. Games average 2.25 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Bravo vs Mura?
The PrvaLiga match finished Bravo 2:0 Mura. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Bravo and Mura?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Bravo won 2, Mura won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Bravo vs Mura?
Bravo score 1.00 goals per game on average and Mura 1.33. The PrvaLiga average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Bravo's matches and 67% of Mura's.
What form are Bravo and Mura in?
Over the last 5 games Bravo have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Mura 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bravo vs Mura?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


