Brinje-Grosuplje vs Mura: match statistics
Brinje-Grosuplje vs Mura: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Brinje-Grosuplje played against Mura in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Brinje-Grosuplje has 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.25 points per game. Mura has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Brinje-Grosuplje scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.25. Mura scores 1.50 and allows 2.50. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Brinje-Grosuplje's games and 75% of Mura's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 75%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mura has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.12 per game. Brinje-Grosuplje takes 8.3 shots per game, while Mura takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Brinje-Grosuplje leads at halftime in 75% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Mura leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Brinje-Grosuplje's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Mura, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
PrvaLiga games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Brinje-Grosuplje have the more favorable recent record, earning 8 points from their last five matches with 2 wins, 2 draws, and just 1 defeat, while Mura have lost 3 of their last 5 games. The hosts conceded 5 goals during this period, compared with 13 for the visitors, which—alongside an average of 3.5 goals conceded away from home—is the strongest argument against Mura. However, Mura are capable of creating chances, averaging 15.5 shots and 7 on target away from home, with an xG of 2.01 compared with 0.68 for Brinje-Grosuplje. The visitors’ main problem is that their defense allows opponents an xG of 1.47 and has failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match. Brinje-Grosuplje also lack control in possession, averaging just 34%, but they remain unbeaten at home and should be able to exploit their opponents’ highly unstable defense more effectively.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Mura have an exceptionally clear profile of matches with goals at both ends: BTTS landed in 100% of their league fixtures and in 80% of their last five matches. The visitors score an average of 2.0 goals per game, create chances worth 2.01 xG and register 7.0 shots on target, making their goal highly likely. At the same time, Mura concede as many as 3.5 goals per game across the season and 2.6 in their last five appearances, without keeping a single clean sheet. Brinje-Grosuplje average 1.0 goal, but Mura allow opponents 1.47 xG, which strengthens the home side’s chances of finding a response. Although Brinje-Grosuplje have recorded BTTS in only 50% of their matches and 40% of their last five, the extent of the visitors’ defensive problems provides a stronger signal for a both-teams-to-score scenario: BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Mura plays in a very open style: its matches have averaged 5.5 goals, as they score 2.0 goals per game but concede as many as 3.5. The visitors have seen at least 2 goals in 100% of their matches, with Over 2.5 goals also landing in 100% of cases, while they have conceded an average of 2.6 goals across their last five games. Brinje-Grosuplje create chances worth 1.15 xG, while Mura allows opponents 1.47 xG, supporting a forecast of approximately 1.35 goals for the home side. Mura's attack generates 2.01 xG and 7.0 shots on target per game, clearly more than Brinje-Grosuplje's 3.0 shots on target, which is why the visitors' expected goal tally stands at 1.85. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have scored at least once in every match so far, while the combined forecast of 3.20 goals gives this line a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Brinje-Grosuplje are in clearly better current form: they have averaged 1.6 points over their last five matches, compared with just 0.8 for Mura, who have lost 60% of those games. The hosts led at the break in three of their last five appearances and conceded just 0.2 goals per match before half-time, while Mura were trailing after 45 minutes in 60% of their matches, conceding an average of 1.0 goal. Although Mura create more chances, as reflected by their xG of 2.01 and seven shots on target per match compared with Brinje-Grosuplje’s 1.15 and three, their defense has conceded an average of 3.5 goals and 2.6 goals over their last five matches. The visitors have been particularly vulnerable after the break, conceding an average of 1.6 goals in their last five appearances. Therefore, the most likely scenario is an HT/FT 1/1 outcome, with the hosts taking the lead before half-time and maintaining it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Brinje-Grosuplje | Mura | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Brinje-Grosuplje is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.25 pts / game - Brinje-Grosuplje · 1 pts / game - Mura
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mura is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Brinje-Grosuplje · 1.5 goals / game - Mura
Brinje-Grosuplje is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Brinje-Grosuplje · 2.5 goals / game - Mura
Brinje-Grosuplje scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).
Mura scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Brinje-Grosuplje keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Brinje-Grosuplje
Over / Under - Mura
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Brinje-Grosuplje is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.25 pts / game - Brinje-Grosuplje · 1.5 pts / game - Mura
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Brinje-Grosuplje - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mura - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.25 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 0.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 75% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Brinje-Grosuplje
Mura
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Brinje-Grosuplje | Liga | Mura | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.25 | 2.59 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 41% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 25% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 86% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Brinje-Grosuplje vs Mura?
The PrvaLiga match finished Brinje-Grosuplje 1:2 Mura. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Brinje-Grosuplje vs Mura?
Brinje-Grosuplje score 1.00 goals per game on average and Mura 1.50. The PrvaLiga average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Brinje-Grosuplje's matches and 75% of Mura's.
What form are Brinje-Grosuplje and Mura in?
Over the last 5 games Brinje-Grosuplje have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Mura 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brinje-Grosuplje vs Mura?
The statistical background for Brinje-Grosuplje vs Mura — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


