Cacahuatique vs FAS: match statistics
FAS displays significantly better form and quality this season. The away team has won 19 matches with only 5 defeats, scoring 69 goals, which averages nearly 2 goals per away game. In their last 5 matches, FAS remains undefeated with 4 wins and an impressive 11:3 goal difference. Cacahuatique, however, has very poor home form - winning only 13% of their home matches and a negative goal difference of -9. The hosts have lost half of their home games and in their last 5 home matches, they are on a run of defeats and draws. FAS's advantage in xG statistics (1.62 vs 1.47), shot accuracy (18% vs 12%), and overall offensive efficiency clearly points to an away victory.
Cacahuatique vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cacahuatique played against FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Cacahuatique has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. FAS has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Cacahuatique scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.39. FAS scores 2.09 and allows 1.06. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of Cacahuatique's games and 61% of FAS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 55%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.38 per game. Cacahuatique takes 8.6 shots per game, while FAS takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. FAS leads at halftime in 39% and scores 1.15 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cacahuatique's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For FAS, it is minutes 76-90+ (22 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FAS displays significantly better form and quality this season. The away team has won 19 matches with only 5 defeats, scoring 69 goals, which averages nearly 2 goals per away game. In their last 5 matches, FAS remains undefeated with 4 wins and an impressive 11:3 goal difference. Cacahuatique, however, has very poor home form - winning only 13% of their home matches and a negative goal difference of -9. The hosts have lost half of their home games and in their last 5 home matches, they are on a run of defeats and draws. FAS's advantage in xG statistics (1.62 vs 1.47), shot accuracy (18% vs 12%), and overall offensive efficiency clearly points to an away victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cacahuatique | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FAS is 63% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 2.6 pts / game - FAS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 65% better for: goals scored per game.
1.27 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 2.09 goals / game - FAS
FAS is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.39 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 1.06 goals / game - FAS
Cacahuatique scores in 79% of games (26 of 33 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 games).
FAS scores in 88% of games (29 of 33 games), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
Over / Under - FAS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAS is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 1.61 pts / game - FAS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
FAS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (22 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cacahuatique
FAS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Cacahuatique | Liga | FAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.67 | 2.72 | ▲ 3.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 56% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 69% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FASGoalDustin Clifman Corea Garay
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Cacahuatique's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses against FAS. Games average 2.25 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cacahuatique vs FAS?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 0:1 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and FAS?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 1, FAS won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs FAS?
Cacahuatique score 1.27 goals per game on average and FAS 2.09. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Cacahuatique's matches and 61% of FAS's.
What form are Cacahuatique and FAS in?
Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FAS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs FAS?
The statistical background for Cacahuatique vs FAS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.