Cacahuatique vs Inter: match statistics
Cacahuatique vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cacahuatique played against Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Cacahuatique has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Inter has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Cacahuatique scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.75. Inter scores 1.50 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Cacahuatique's games and 25% of Inter's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.44 per game. Cacahuatique takes 9.6 shots per game, while Inter takes 7.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. Inter leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.13 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cacahuatique's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Inter, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Inter head into the match in significantly better form: they have won 4 of their last 5 games, scoring 10 goals and averaging 2.4 points per match, while Cacahuatique have failed to win any of their last five fixtures, scoring just 3 goals. The hosts have a clear defensive issue at home, conceding an average of 2.17 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in only 17% of matches. Inter are considerably more solid defensively away from home, recording a clean sheet in 60% of their outings and conceding just 1 goal on average, although their average xG against stands at 1.80, meaning Cacahuatique should be able to create chances. The visitors also hold an advantage in possession, averaging 66% compared with the hosts’ 49%, while their away-match xG is 1.42 versus Cacahuatique’s 1.30 at home. The risk of a draw remains significant, as Inter have drawn 40% of their away matches and failed to score in 40% of them, but their current run and the hosts’ poor form point towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as both teams have recorded low rates of matches with goals from both sides throughout the season: Cacahuatique 33% and Inter just 20%, compared with 46% league-wide. The hosts concede an average of only 0.33 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 67% of their games, which significantly limits Inter’s chances of scoring. Inter also has a 60% clean-sheet rate, while Cacahuatique has scored just 3 goals in its last five matches, averaging 0.6 per game. Although the teams’ xG figures are similar—1.46 for the hosts and 1.42 for the visitors—Cacahuatique’s current attacking form and the strong defensive metrics of both sides more strongly support a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: the league average is 2.52 goals, while Cacahuatique concede just 0.33 goals per home match. Inter have kept a clean sheet in 60% of their matches, and the hosts have scored only 0.6 goals per game across their last 5 matches, despite averaging 1.39 xG. The visitors are in better attacking form, averaging 2.0 goals scored in their last five appearances, but their xG of 1.34 suggests a result closer to one goal than a high-scoring game. Seasonal trends support this assessment: 67% of the hosts’ matches and 80% of Inter’s matches have finished with under 3.5 goals, making Under 3.5 the clearest value bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Inter victory, as Cacahuatique drew the first half in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 40% for Inter. Current form clearly favors the visitors: Inter have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.0 goals scored and just 0.8 conceded, while the hosts have won none, scoring only 0.6 goals per match. After the break, Inter are particularly dangerous, averaging 1.6 goals in their last five appearances compared with Cacahuatique’s 0.4, while their goal difference in those second halves stands at +7. The hosts do have an excellent overall home record, averaging 2.33 points and 2.0 goals per match, but their downturn in form and Inter’s efficiency after the interval increase the likelihood of the X/2 outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cacahuatique | Inter | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Inter is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 2.4 pts / game - Inter
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Inter is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 1.5 goals / game - Inter
Inter is 133% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.75 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 0.75 goals / game - Inter
Cacahuatique scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 games).
Inter scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 games), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
Over / Under - Inter
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Inter is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 1.25 pts / game - Inter
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Inter - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cacahuatique
Inter
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Cacahuatique | Liga | Inter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.13 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 48% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 33% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 71% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cacahuatique's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Inter. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cacahuatique vs Inter?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 0:2 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and Inter?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 2, Inter won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs Inter?
Cacahuatique score 1.38 goals per game on average and Inter 1.50. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Cacahuatique's matches and 25% of Inter's.
What form are Cacahuatique and Inter in?
Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Inter 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs Inter?
The statistical background for Cacahuatique vs Inter — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.